If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A slight correction: XM Radio does not offer "better than CD quality sound." It offers less than CD quality sound due to the audio compression. With the O-470 purring away less than 8 feet from my ears, full CD quality would be a waste. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I stand corrected- however, the quality is much better than FM broadcast,
and with no commercials. The decision regarding the GDL 69 comes down to convenience and the need to have a lot of loose wires, notebook computers, etc in the cockpit, even with bluetooth. The GDL 69, although not perfect, integrates well with my 530, particularly in combination with the stormscope. It is excellent for a long range view if you are going around an extended line of storms, but would not be especially good for navigating through a line of scattered storms. In this scenario, on board radar is a better choice, along with the stormscope. The XM radio is an added bonus, particularly on those long cross country trips. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Jon Kraus wrote: We are contemplating adding a weather uplink system and was wondering what experience you have had on the WxWorx or Anywhere Wx. We are leading towards the Anywhere Wx but wanted to get some comments on both. Thanks!! Jon, You may want to consider the AnywhereWx package. In addition to weather, you also get A/FD information, FBO information, hotel/restaurant information, and fuel prices (though the fuel database is new and sparse right now.) Bottom line is that with the AnywhereWx package, you get some extras that competitors do not provide, but are a great reference even if you carry A/FDs and the AOPA directory. Plus, you'll have a decent backup GPS display if you choose to use it. JKG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I just bought the Anywhere WX system for my Skylane. It uses the iPAQ 4705
for display, Garmin 10 GPS and the WxWrox XM receiver all connected via bluetooth. Cost was around $2700. Although I haven't flown next to any weather with it, having NexRad in the cockpit is awesome! Some of the other features of the system are nice, yet other features are worthless to me, but the weather is great. I also like clicking on the map and seeing the METARS and TAF's. I have pulled the plane out of the hangar and tested it numerous times... works like a charm. The system included a package called Pocket Plates, which has all the approach plates for the US stored in a SD card on the ipaq. This package is interesting, but not very useful. The ipaq display is too small to show the whole plate. It lets you zoom in on the plate, but then you can see only small portions of the plate at a time. Not much use to me. I was skeptical of a system that uses an iPAQ... I HATE tapping through menus while flying... but I got the hot keys setup in the program with most everything I want to do, so it isn't too much of a chore. I am a professional software developer, so I am comfortable with the mechanics of the pocket pc. :Like you, I have a Garmin GNS 430, so the GPS is covered, but having a battery powered ipaq and gps is a very nice backup. Although the Anywhere WX has flight planning, I won't use it, I will use the 430 for that. Again, the anywhere map is for primarily for weather and GPS backup. The Garmin 396 looks like a great system. My father just bought an Anywhere WX system, but I am going to recommend he return it and get a 396. Why? He is barely computer literate so working an ipaq might be a headache for him. Also, he wants to move the system between his many airplanes, and the Anywhere WX system has lots of wires and plugs. I only have one plane and don't plan to move the system around, so all my wires are neatly routed and tucked away. I also got a quote from the local avionics shop for a panel mounted MX-20 with the GL-69 Wx receiver. Price was around $17,000. The Anywhere System gave me more features for a fraction of the cost. I could have bought the GL-69 receiver and had the weather displayed on my 430. I decided against hat because the 430 display is small and terrible for weather display and it still would have cost nearly $5,000. The ipaq has a beautiful display. Guy Byars "Jon Kraus" wrote in message ... We are contemplating adding a weather uplink system and was wondering what experience you have had on the WxWorx or Anywhere Wx. We are leading towards the Anywhere Wx but wanted to get some comments on both. Thanks!! Jon Kraus '79 Mooney 201 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'd wait and get the Garmin 396. I have the Anywhere system and it does
have lots of problems. Nothing that can't be overcome if you like working with computers, etc. Just look at the forums at controlvision.com for details. It's a cobbled together system. The 396 is an all in one box, that works. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Greg Davis" wrote: I'd wait and get the Garmin 396. I have the Anywhere system and it does have lots of problems. Nothing that can't be overcome if you like working with computers, etc. Just look at the forums at controlvision.com for details. It's a cobbled together system. The 396 is an all in one box, that works. I've heard about these reports, and I read the Control Vision forums almost daily, but don't notice the "lots of problems" that some complain about. There are some problems using the latest software with older iPaqs, but I'm not sure how reasonable it is to expect the latest features to run on a 3 year old iPaq. As far as I know, there's nothing preventing folks who have been running a stable system with older software from continuing to do so. There have been scattered reports of XM activation issues, but those problems seem related to XM and certainly don't represent the majority of users. There is no guarantee that the 396 won't have similar XM issues. When I received the AnywhereWx system, it was pre-loaded and worked out of the box with minimal fuss. Software upgrades to require some minor skill with computers, but so do software upgrades for Garmin's products, at least their handheld products, in my experience. As far as I know, no one is forcing anyone else to be on the bleeding edge. JKG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Guy Byars" wrote: Also, he wants to move the system between his many airplanes, and the Anywhere WX system has lots of wires and plugs. I only have one plane and don't plan to move the system around, so all my wires are neatly routed and tucked away. To me, mobility is the single largest advantage to the Garmin 396. I have the wires for AnywhereWx pretty much out of sight behind side panels, so it's not a problem, but it's also not portable other than the iPaq and GPS (which can easily be removed to use elsewhere, such as in the car...but weather is stuck in the airplane). If I were a renter, the ability to throw the 396 into a new plane every day with minimal fuss would be very appealing. However, I'm not aware that the 396 has the airport directory, fuel price, or A/FD information contained in the latest version of AnywhereWx. Whether you choose to "rely" on this information in lieu of the official FAA documentation is up to you, but it's there at your fingertips nonetheless. And I'm not aware that the FAA provides official documentation on hotels, rental cars, and restaurants, or fuel prices. I agree, I would skip the purchase of PocketPlates, especially with the approach database included with the latest version of AnywhereWx. JKG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Jonathan Goodish wrote:
However, I'm not aware that the 396 has the airport directory, fuel price, or A/FD information contained in the latest version of AnywhereWx. The "killer app" for AnywhereWX in my opinion is still the backup AI. If only I'd finally break down and buy the damned thing laugh. - Andrew |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I also have the AWMap system and like it. I do use it for flight
planning when I'm away from home. You can input wind assumptions and it gives you heading and groundspeed to use for filing your flight plan. If you own the aircraft, you can "park" the 12v wiring for the 3 units out of the way so all you have to do when you arrive is plug in the gps and ipaq. You can remove the ipaq from its support to make it easier to tap for items not included in the hot keys, i.e. picking up specific metars. The new airport info screens are very fine also. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:24:50 GMT, Jon Kraus
wrote: We are contemplating adding a weather uplink system and was wondering what experience you have had on the WxWorx or Anywhere Wx. We are leading towards the Anywhere Wx but wanted to get some comments on both. Thanks!! I have a used Fujitsu ST4121 tablet PC with transflective (daylight viewable) display. I run a combo of WxWorx SW with my own moving map SW. The tablet PC has a ~4 hr battery life. If I am on a long x-c, I use a power inverter on the cigarette ligther to power/charge the tablet PC. I use Bluetooth to connect the peripherals to the tablet, and am thrilled with the cable free performance of the devices. -Belkin Bluetooth card providing Bluetooth to the ST4121 -Garmin GPS10, Bluetooth GPS with integrated antenna (about the size of a pack of cigarettes) -Bluetooth version of WxWorx's receiver. From a weather services standpoint, I currently am using the XM Aviator's lite package, which is $29/month. It provides Nexrad and Metar, which is all I really need. There is a more advanced package $59/month which I used to have, but found I did not use often enough. It is hard to imagine going back to a WxWorx-less plane. It allows me to make both VFR and IFR flights without constantly worrying about the weather ahead. It is easily the best money I have spent on the plane (besides av-fuel!). My only complaint about my setup is the number of cigarette lighter attachments: Power inverter, GPS10 charger, WxWorx charger. I also still have a G295 in the plane, so it runs on cigarette lighter too. I can see why the Garmin 396 will be a hit. It is hard to beat the level of integration. -Nathan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WxWorx flight test | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | October 12th 03 02:54 PM |
WxWorx continued | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 27th 03 01:05 PM |
WxWorx continued | Dan Luke | Piloting | 8 | September 27th 03 01:05 PM |
(long) WxWorx arrived...(and NavAero) | Lenny Sawyer | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 10th 03 12:39 AM |
(long) WxWorx arrived...(and NavAero) | Lenny Sawyer | Piloting | 1 | September 10th 03 12:39 AM |