A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lost comm altitude?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 10th 04, 04:11 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lost comm altitude?

The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).

I'm inclined to think stopping my climb at 4000 makes the most sense,
but one could make arguments in support of any of the alternatives.

The OROCA is 4700. 5 miles to the west, the OROCA goes up to 6700. MEA
on V157 is 4000, MOCA is 2700.
  #2  
Old January 10th 04, 05:56 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...
The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).

I'm inclined to think stopping my climb at 4000 makes the most sense,
but one could make arguments in support of any of the alternatives.

The OROCA is 4700. 5 miles to the west, the OROCA goes up to 6700. MEA
on V157 is 4000, MOCA is 2700.


Heh, that's a nice dilemma. The instructions are contradictory enough that
there isn't anything you can do that would assure that you're doing what ATC
expects. So I'd vote for climbing to 5000' (since at least that part of the
directive is unambiguous), and then staying there (since there's no clear
directive to descend, and other things being equal, higher is better). I
would hope and expect that ATC would at least clear a block for you from
3000 to 5000 to cover the plausible interpretations.

--Gary


  #3  
Old January 10th 04, 06:22 PM
Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).


I would say that the altitudes you were issued constitute an amendment to the
Dutchess Four clearance, so I'd stop at 3000, intercept V157, then climb to
4000 10 minutes after takeoff. If I was nervous about terrain, then I'd use
my emergency authority to go to whatever altitude I felt was necessary, and
then back to 4000 once established on V157.

Related question: looking at the approach plates for POU, I see that the
VOR/DME RNAV or GPS RWY 6 shows no MSA. Does anyone know why? All the other
approaches to POU show an MSA circle.

Barry


  #4  
Old January 10th 04, 06:44 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:22:09 -0500, "Barry" wrote:

Related question: looking at the approach plates for POU, I see that the
VOR/DME RNAV or GPS RWY 6 shows no MSA. Does anyone know why? All the other
approaches to POU show an MSA circle.


The Jepp chart states that no MSA is published for this approach.
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #5  
Old January 10th 04, 06:49 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:11:33 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:

The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).

I'm inclined to think stopping my climb at 4000 makes the most sense,
but one could make arguments in support of any of the alternatives.


I would do exactly as the chart states and not try to second-guess the
reasons. (Except that after ten minutes, to get from 5000 to 4000
obviously requires a descent).

Certainly if you climbed to 5000 when cleared to 4000, that would also
serve to get ATC's attention, and might lead to sooner establishment of
radio contact.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #6  
Old January 10th 04, 06:51 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Barry" wrote in message
...
The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).


I would say that the altitudes you were issued constitute an amendment to

the
Dutchess Four clearance, so I'd stop at 3000, intercept V157, then climb

to
4000 10 minutes after takeoff.


Sure the altitudes amend the Dutchess Four clearance itself, but not the
clearence's explicit lost-comm procedure. That would only be amended if ATC
issued explicit lost-comm altitudes too.

--Gary

If I was nervous about terrain, then I'd use
my emergency authority to go to whatever altitude I felt was necessary,

and
then back to 4000 once established on V157.

Related question: looking at the approach plates for POU, I see that the
VOR/DME RNAV or GPS RWY 6 shows no MSA. Does anyone know why? All the

other
approaches to POU show an MSA circle.

Barry




  #7  
Old January 10th 04, 07:12 PM
Barry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sure the altitudes amend the Dutchess Four clearance itself, but not the
clearence's explicit lost-comm procedure. That would only be amended if ATC
issued explicit lost-comm altitudes too.


But when ATC tells you "Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10," isn't "expect
4000" explicitly for lost-comm? From the AIM:

EXPECT (ALTITUDE) AT (TIME) or (FIX)- Used under certain conditions to provide
a pilot with an altitude to be used in the event of two-way communications
failure. It also provides altitude information to assist the pilot in
planning.

Barry





  #8  
Old January 10th 04, 07:32 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Barry" wrote in message
...
Sure the altitudes amend the Dutchess Four clearance itself, but not the
clearence's explicit lost-comm procedure. That would only be amended if

ATC
issued explicit lost-comm altitudes too.


But when ATC tells you "Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10," isn't

"expect
4000" explicitly for lost-comm? From the AIM:


Hm, yes, that's a good point. But then "maintain 3000" isn't for lost comm.
So I guess the most literal (but not the most sensible) interpretation would
be to climb to 5000' as per the explicit Dutchess Four lost-comm procedure,
then descend to 4000' as per the overriding "expect 4000 after 10". Or
something like that.


  #9  
Old January 10th 04, 07:34 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'd climb to 5000, then MEAs permitting) descend to 4000. In no case would I
stop before 5000. The (explicit) instructions to do so on lost comm may be to
get you high enough to receive a different outlet, or to be picked up on a
better radar sweep. Who knows... they asked me to do that, I do that.

Jose


--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #10  
Old January 10th 04, 07:40 PM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:11:33 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:

The Dutchess Four Departure has lost comm instructions which read, "If
radio contact is not established/lost for more than two minutes after
departing, proceed on course and climb to 5000 feet. Ten minutes after
departure, climb to requested altitude/flight level".

Let's say my clearance is "Cleared to HPN via Dutchess Four, V157,
HAARP, direct. Maintain 3000, expect 4000 after 10". If I go lost
comm, do they expect me to climb to 5000, stay there for 10 minutes,
then descend back down to 4000? Or stop my climb at 4000? Or climb to
5000 and stay there (which would presumably leave me WAFDOF).

I'm inclined to think stopping my climb at 4000 makes the most sense,
but one could make arguments in support of any of the alternatives.


I would do exactly as the chart states and not try to second-guess the
reasons. (Except that after ten minutes, to get from 5000 to 4000
obviously requires a descent).


Well, descending when told to climb is itself a kind of second-guessing of
the chart's intent--and to me it waves a rather bright red flag!

--Gary

Certainly if you climbed to 5000 when cleared to 4000, that would also
serve to get ATC's attention, and might lead to sooner establishment of
radio contact.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Retractable Comm Antenna Ron Wanttaja Home Built 11 September 6th 04 06:59 PM
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom Jaysen Underhill Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 11th 03 09:41 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
Lost comm - Arrival Michael 182 Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 28th 03 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.