If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Piper Commanche vs Money 201
I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965
Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami (remove the "_REMOVE_THIS" from the email address to respond directly) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:23:27 -0600, "O. Sami Saydjari"
wrote: I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965 Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami 1. Bonanza - there is no substitute. 2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotts wrote:
2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 160kts in a cleaned up Comanche isn't vapor -- that's only about 185MPH. It's not even uncommon. I see speeds like that all the time in my slightly-cleaned-up (Lopresti and Knots2U) 250 -- speeds that I'm confident in because we were positively anal about evaluating each mod that went on (and in some case, subsequently came off) the airframe. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. I've yet to find a Comanche part that wasn't available or couldn't be fabricated by Webco or Johnston. That includes every bit and piece of the gear system, stabilator trim tabs (had to replace one when installing the Vne kit), aileron skins (an L-39 got dropped on one of mine while my aircraft was undergoing a year-long refit), fuel cells and other random bits-and-pieces. While it might take someone with particular Comanche mojo to keep a 400 in the air, I've had no issues with a 250 with a combination of doing my homework and otherwise competent mechanics. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Go for the Comanche. They have good backing. (ie. ISC, webco ect) Parts
are very easy to get Webco has just about every thing. Parts are not that much (compared to the Bonanza). I have flown a pa24-250 and trued out to right around 180 mph. They are a good plane for the money. altho the Bonanza will have a higher resale price. But if you sell the plane in a few years I think you will get your money back and then some. Best of luck TONY www.comancheflyer.com (has some comanche info) *** Sent via http://www.automationtools.com *** Add a newsgroup interface to your website today. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I know a guy with a comanche 260, really nice plane, fast, good useful load.
his will do 160 kts. Heck my 200 HP Turbo Arrow III typically does 150-155 kts. Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:23:27 -0600, "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965 Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami 1. Bonanza - there is no substitute. 2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:16:33 -0800, Jeff wrote:
I know a guy with a comanche 260, really nice plane, fast, good useful load. his will do 160 kts. Heck my 200 HP Turbo Arrow III typically does 150-155 kts. I guess these claims are correct. I was referring to a no tail wind situation!!! Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:23:27 -0600, "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965 Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami 1. Bonanza - there is no substitute. 2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Stu Gotts
wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:16:33 -0800, Jeff wrote: I know a guy with a comanche 260, really nice plane, fast, good useful load. his will do 160 kts. Heck my 200 HP Turbo Arrow III typically does 150-155 kts. I guess these claims are correct. I was referring to a no tail wind situation!!! well, if we can talk about tailwinds, then my cherokee 140 is a 155kt bird. -- Bob Noel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotts wrote:
I guess these claims are correct. I was referring to a no tail wind situation!!! So are we. Actually, to be precise in my case, the average speed seen by flying reciprocal courses to factor wind out of the equation I don't see any reason to hang an after market mod on the airframe if it doesn't demonstrate a performance improvement, so if something goes on and doesn't deliver it comes off again (rudder gap seals come to mind). It's perfectly possible to make a PA24-250/260 cruise at or above 200MPH, but doing so requires tossing the factory cowl and demands the Vne stabilator mod that most people haven't bothered to perform. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I am referring to no tail wind also.
My t-arrow gets 150-155 KTAS - Not ground speed, and this is at 65% power. 3 days ago, at 14,000 ft, I had a TAS of 160 kts and a GS of 183 kts. Everyone I know who flies a t-arrow flight plans at least 150 kts. Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:16:33 -0800, Jeff wrote: I know a guy with a comanche 260, really nice plane, fast, good useful load. his will do 160 kts. Heck my 200 HP Turbo Arrow III typically does 150-155 kts. I guess these claims are correct. I was referring to a no tail wind situation!!! Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:23:27 -0600, "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965 Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami 1. Bonanza - there is no substitute. 2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, I certainly believe you! ;-)
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:22:40 -0800, Jeff wrote: I am referring to no tail wind also. My t-arrow gets 150-155 KTAS - Not ground speed, and this is at 65% power. 3 days ago, at 14,000 ft, I had a TAS of 160 kts and a GS of 183 kts. Everyone I know who flies a t-arrow flight plans at least 150 kts. Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:16:33 -0800, Jeff wrote: I know a guy with a comanche 260, really nice plane, fast, good useful load. his will do 160 kts. Heck my 200 HP Turbo Arrow III typically does 150-155 kts. I guess these claims are correct. I was referring to a no tail wind situation!!! Jeff http://www.turboarrow3.com Stu Gotts wrote: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:23:27 -0600, "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: I am looking at buying one of two planes: a 1978 Mooney M20J or a 1965 Piper Commanche PA-24-260. I have test driven both and I like the handling of both. Both are about the same price. The avionics in the Mooney are slightly better. This is a tough choice. (1) Is there anyone out there that has flown both airplanes extensively and can give me pros and cons of each from their perspective? (2) Is there any other plane with similar price/performance capabilities (cruise at better than 160nts, 750+ range) in the same price range ($75K-$100K) that I should consider? (3) I heard Mooney is teetering on bankruptcy. Is this a real big downside? Has anyone experienced owning a plane with a manufacturer went bankrupt. Do parts become impossible to find? -Sami 1. Bonanza - there is no substitute. 2. Those speeds are vaporware, you'll never see them from either machine. 3. Mooney seems to be emerging from their financial troubles, and believe it or not, may own Beechcraft soon. Comanche parts are becoming a bit difficult to find and added to the fact that the aircraft is no being produced worries me. Also, a good Comanche mechanic is a must if you want to keep the aircraft in the air. Good luck. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how much money have you lost on the lottery? NOW GET THAT MONEY BACK! | shane | Home Built | 0 | February 5th 05 07:54 AM |
Start receiving MONEY with this simple system. Guaranteed. | Mr Anderson | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 2nd 04 11:55 PM |