If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I dunno.... p-factor, torque, and spiraling slipstream could all have an
effect to eliminate the need for the j-stroke if you stroke only from the left side of the canoe, but ONLY if you use a propellor as a paddle...... If you use a paddle for a propellor make sure you feather it on the forward part of the stroke..... Thanks to all for responding to an idea that I agree borders on the nonsensical. I'll skip asking wether using a prop as a canoe paddle would eliminate the need to j-stroke. ;-) - Scott |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Scott Marquardt wrote: Dan Thomas wrote: Aircraft floats are designed the way they are for a critical purpose and it would be difficult indeed to come up with something much different that might still work. Looks like there's agreement on that. Hokay, then, would any respectable homebuilt pontoon be capable of doubling as some kind of canoe? Granted, we still have the problem that a canoe is generally wide open, whereas a pontoon that's wide open is ill-advised. Perhaps a kayak design, where a simple hole in the middle of the pontoon could be easily covered, might work -- provided a pontoon would be seaworthy (why do I have this nagging sense it would just tip over no matter what you tried to do with it). pontoons _are_ top-heavy, *by*design*. However, I see no reason, why you couldn't carry a couple of small 'outriggers' to deal with _that_ problem. Thanks to all for responding to an idea that I agree borders on the nonsensical. I'll skip asking wether using a prop as a canoe paddle would eliminate the need to j-stroke. ;-) Depends, is it fixed or variable pitch ?? chortle |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
gpa wrote: "nooneimportant" wrote in message news:7yiZa.109146$o%2.48070@sccrnsc02... I dunno.... p-factor, torque, and spiraling slipstream could all have an effect to eliminate the need for the j-stroke if you stroke only from the left side of the canoe, but ONLY if you use a propellor as a paddle...... If you use a paddle for a propellor make sure you feather it on the forward part of the stroke..... Indeed, however, if you intend to use a propellor from an eastern european aircraft such as a Yakolev 52 please be advised that everything you recommended is the same but in reverse..and of course the canoe would also have to be upside down... Nah, just in Australia. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Bonomi wrote:
However, I see no reason, why you couldn't carry a couple of small 'outriggers' to deal with _that_ problem. To heck with canoes -- how about using both pontoons as a catamaran? Add a sail. Or heck, use the plane's seats too, and contrive a paddle-boat. Put some hydroplanes under the pontoons. Solve world hunger. Get toast to land butter side up. And so forth. Is there any homebuilt in existence that could double as a bass boat? Or, of course, is there any bass boat etc. - Scott "but seriously, folks" Marquardt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Bushy" wrote in message ...
How large of a sinker do you need to troll at 40 mph? I'll let you know in a couple of years, but from what they reckon, 20mph +full flap + 30%power = fly at 20mph - 20mph headwind = 0mph ground speed Yeah, but do the big ones bite on a windy day? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Marquardt wrote in message . ..
But hey, and here I'm almost serious again: could a pontoon be made that would fly well, plane well -- and work *upside down* as a better hull for a catamaran? As has been pointed out, an aviation pontoon hull would make a lousy boat hull, and vice versa. But might the *top* of a good aviation pontoon also be a good hull shape for a cat? Maybe. But either you sit astride it (using the step as back support?) or else you cut a hole in the surface that's in the water on takeoff and landing. Inflatable boat and a pump, anyone? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Full Lotus made inflatable floats. Use those, catamaran style, or just use
one float and an outrigger. Or just buy a Coot, Osprey, Kingfisher, etc., and stick a trolling motor over the side. RN "Scott Marquardt" wrote in message ... Dan Thomas wrote: Aircraft floats are designed the way they are for a critical purpose and it would be difficult indeed to come up with something much different that might still work. Looks like there's agreement on that. Hokay, then, would any respectable homebuilt pontoon be capable of doubling as some kind of canoe? Granted, we still have the problem that a canoe is generally wide open, whereas a pontoon that's wide open is ill-advised. Perhaps a kayak design, where a simple hole in the middle of the pontoon could be easily covered, might work -- provided a pontoon would be seaworthy (why do I have this nagging sense it would just tip over no matter what you tried to do with it). Thanks to all for responding to an idea that I agree borders on the nonsensical. I'll skip asking wether using a prop as a canoe paddle would eliminate the need to j-stroke. ;-) - Scott |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Marquardt wrote in message . ..
Maybe. But either you sit astride it (using the step as back support?) or else you cut a hole in the surface that's in the water on takeoff and landing. No, for a cat you just use three frame pieces and stretch some fine mesh nylon webbing across the open area for a deck. See, it's more practical than you thought. ;-) Ah - missed the cat part. So....how do you propose to attach the frame to the upended pontoon? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Corrie wrote:
Ah - missed the cat part. So....how do you propose to attach the frame to the upended pontoon? I can think of a couple ways of doing it -- both of which would add a small amount of weight. What I'd hope is that the frame pieces needed could double as structural support for the pontoons when mounted on the plane, modifying traditonal mounting of pontoons a bit. Heck, take off a wing and use it as a sail {since I'm on a roll with this; heck, when you get in deep there's no sense coming out the way you got in; there's gotta be another exit somewhere ;-) Just don't ask me how I'd mount *that*. And don't ask me how I'd license the thing as both an airplane and a boat! - Scott |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, but do the big ones bite on a windy day?
Don't know yet, but you get a pretty good view from above the water so you can go where you can see the fish...... Maybe I'll try spear fishing! Stuka style! Peter |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|