A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Trident I C-4 is damaged at US naval base



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 04, 07:01 PM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Trident I C-4 is damaged at US naval base


Missile damaged at naval base
12.03.2004 [19:20]



If the same thing happened in Russia, they would first claim an American caused
the accident.
  #2  
Old March 13th 04, 07:57 PM
David Nicholls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Krztalizer" wrote in message
...

Missile damaged at naval base
12.03.2004 [19:20]



If the same thing happened in Russia, they would first claim an American

caused
the accident.


And then the US members of the news group would point out that it showed the
total incompetance of the Russian military!


  #3  
Old March 14th 04, 01:26 PM
Stephen Harding
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stinky Pete wrote:

The difference is that when the Russians damage a missile, a sub sinks and
its crew is lost (Kursk).


But if you recall, the Kursk was actually sunk by
collision with a US or possibly UK submarine.

Sat photos showed the damaged sub at a NATO base
in Norway where it had limped off to.


SMH


  #4  
Old March 17th 04, 09:34 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 07:26:34 -0500, Stephen Harding wrote:

Stinky Pete wrote:

The difference is that when the Russians damage a missile, a sub sinks and
its crew is lost (Kursk).


But if you recall, the Kursk was actually sunk by
collision with a US or possibly UK submarine.

Sat photos showed the damaged sub at a NATO base
in Norway where it had limped off to.


SMH

That is utter BS, and you either know, or should know, it.

Al Minyard
  #5  
Old March 18th 04, 12:02 AM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The difference is that when the Russians damage a missile, a sub sinks and
its crew is lost (Kursk).


But if you recall, the Kursk was actually sunk by
collision with a US or possibly UK submarine.

Sat photos showed the damaged sub at a NATO base
in Norway where it had limped off to.


Is Petukhov posting under a nom de troll?

1) 99.99% of the people familiar with the event know that it occurred due to a
weapons malfunction on the Kursk. Those that know the facts and refuse to
accept them are not ignorant, just foolish.

2) The "damaged" US sub was apparently not worked on in any way, it made a port
visit and then left, as subs do - the white canopy cover, pointed at as
evidence of damage, is in its normal place over the entrance hatch at the
Quarterdeck - and if the damage WAS located there, it would mean the two
submarines collided with one of the subs upside down (or both laying on their
sides!); patently impossible, let alone in waters as shallow as the Kursk
disaster.

There are only about six conspiracy theorists left on earth that believe, in
the absense of any evidence at all, the US played a hand in the Kursk loss -
are you claiming to be one of them?

Gordon
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Second wing activated at Ramstein Air Base Otis Willie Military Aviation 5 January 17th 04 06:23 PM
U.S. military leaving Kuwaiti air base ~ Associated Press Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 21st 03 10:39 PM
Base Closure List- 2005 Phineas Pinkham Military Aviation 1 September 9th 03 11:06 PM
Yokota Air Base bids fond farewell to C-9s Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 8th 03 08:55 PM
Erosion of U.S. Industrial Base Is Troubling The Enlightenment Military Aviation 1 July 29th 03 06:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.