Minimum rates of climb/descent for VFR

writes:

Any possibility the Administrator has delegated it internally within
FAA?

The regulations (including this one) make a clear distinction between ATC and
the Administrator, so even if he were to delegate it, it would not be to ATC.

wrote in message
...

Any possibility the Administrator has delegated it internally within FAA?


Not on a national basis. There was a test done some years ago within the
Houston Class B airspace that authorized ATC to assign speeds in excess of
250 KIAS. I'm not aware of anything similar at this time.

On Feb 16, 10:11*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote :



You shouldn't be playing with your daddy's computer.

Sorry, but this lame is so past it's sell by date I just couldn't let it go
by without comment.

Since there has been so much interest in trolling and what it is and ins't
these days here's a bit of a primer for those interested in the subject.
Any post slyly left to bait an unwitting fjukkwit is technically a troll.
So, just about everybody who has ever posted on usenet has trolled at one
time or another in whatever modest way. This is a good thing sometimes.
Nothing like geting sucked into a trap to wake you up.
However a schoolyard taunt is just lame and hardly worthy of the title
"troll" and so tarnishes the noble tradition.
having said that, lames are OK if they're multi-leveled and/or serve to
illuminate another aspect of the discussion.
Or if they're funny, of course.


I don't think he meant it as a troll. It was just the best he could
think of.

Cheers

WingFlaps wrote in
:

On Feb 16, 10:11*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
innews:13rbva412cl4s
:



You shouldn't be playing with your daddy's computer.

Sorry, but this lame is so past it's sell by date I just couldn't let
it g
o
by without comment.

Since there has been so much interest in trolling and what it is and
ins't

these days here's a bit of a primer for those interested in the
subject. Any post slyly left to bait an unwitting fjukkwit is
technically a troll. So, just about everybody who has ever posted on
usenet has trolled at one time or another in whatever modest way.
This is a good thing sometimes. Nothing like geting sucked into a
trap to wake you up. However a schoolyard taunt is just lame and
hardly worthy of the title "troll" and so tarnishes the noble
tradition. having said that, lames are OK if they're multi-leveled
and/or serve to illuminate another aspect of the discussion.
Or if they're funny, of course.


I don't think he meant it as a troll. It was just the best he could
think of.


Yeh, i suppose it was just a lame.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

Any possibility the Administrator has delegated it internally within
FAA?

The regulations (including this one) make a clear distinction between
ATC and the Administrator, so even if he were to delegate it, it would
not be to ATC.


Now here's a man who has no idea. Wwhy don't we ask him?


Bertie

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
:


wrote in message
.
..

Any possibility the Administrator has delegated it internally within
FAA?


Not on a national basis. There was a test done some years ago within
the Houston Class B airspace that authorized ATC to assign speeds in
excess of 250 KIAS. I'm not aware of anything similar at this time.




Obviously.


Bertie

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Ah, OK, that's the BD 5J. the BD 10 was a whole nuther thing. It looked
like an F-14 and was a two seater.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untit...led/0118958/L/

Death trap.

--
Dallas

On Feb 15, 11:22 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Any possibility the Administrator has delegated it internally within
FAA?

The regulations (including this one) make a clear distinction between ATC and
the Administrator, so even if he were to delegate it, it would not be to ATC.

You are obviously ignorant as to how U. S, fed agencies routinely
delegate authority downward from statute, thru Regs, and even via
internal procedures. What, losing your touch on Google as your sole
source of expertise? And doesn't the Administrator "write" the Regs?

F--

Dallas wrote in news:1u5nc898ll9l2
:

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Ah, OK, that's the BD 5J. the BD 10 was a whole nuther thing. It looked
like an F-14 and was a two seater.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untit...led/0118958/L/

Death trap.


Yeah, hey didn't work too well. I think both crashed.

Bertie

On Feb 17, 6:20*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dallas wrote in news:1u5nc898ll9l2
:

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Ah, OK, that's the BD 5J. the BD 10 was a whole nuther thing. It looked
like an F-14 and was a two seater.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untit...led/0118958/L/

Death trap.

Yeah, hey didn't work too well. I think both crashed.


Did you know that Bede design suggested that a turbofan powered car
could out perform direct drive in fuel economy? Makes you wonder what
book of aeronautics he worked from.

Cheers