If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Tetsuji Rai" wrote in message s.com... Airspeed limitation below 10000ft is usually 250kts unless you have been authorized by the Administrator. However I guess it's a bit slow for military fighters. So I am curious how fast military fighters fly in the real world. I guess it's very dangerous military aircraft fly much fast among civilian planes. So how fast is short final in a F-14 or whatever? Always wanted to know. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"S. Sampson" wrote in message news:1XBQb.6581$ce2.5743@okepread03... There was a climb corridor out of Mt. Home well into the 80's. I have Salt Lake City sectionals from 1969, 1972, and 1987, none of them show a climb corridor at Mountain Home AFB. Nor does the current chart, which can be viewed online at: http://makeashorterlink.com/?R10722D27 |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Darrell" wrote in message news:5vBQb.65145 If the "Dash One" manual for the military airplane specifies a speed higher than 250 below 10,000' it's OK to fly that fast. Same applies to civil craft. Loaded 747 would climb at about 273. We would just advise ATC of climb speed. Were you required/requested to do that? JG |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
"S. Sampson" wrote There was a climb corridor out of Mt. Home well into the 80's. I have Salt Lake City sectionals from 1969, 1972, and 1987, none of them show a climb corridor at Mountain Home AFB. Nor does the current chart, which can be viewed online at: http://makeashorterlink.com/?R10722D27 I'm not sure what map it was. Do you have any highs and lows from back then? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"S. Sampson" wrote in message news:%JCQb.6585$ce2.6236@okepread03... I'm not sure what map it was. Do you have any highs and lows from back then? Probably, but these things were charted on sectional charts. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, it is a rule here too as we follow the 7110.65 just like in the
U.S. But it is a rule we don't always strickly enforce unless we have to. I don't like them going that fast, but unless there is a reason for me to slow them down, I don't usually bother. Now I would never have one buz an airliner or civilian plane going that fast, but you get the idea. I'm sure it is different with the FAA boys working in a busy area, but for us over open water we don't care too much. Our airspace goes out to 50 miles around Okinawa, so it is 90% over water. Glenn On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:18:22 GMT, "John R Weiss" wrote: "Glenn Westfall" wrote... I'm an Air Force Air Traffic Controller and am currently working in Okinawa, Japan. We have F-15's here at Kadena and it is not uncommon for them to come back well above 400 Kts below 10,000. How far out over the water does the 250-below-10 limit extend in Japan? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Darkwing Duck" wrote...
So how fast is short final in a F-14 or whatever? Always wanted to know. 125 to 140 knots, depending on airplane and landing weight. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
depends on the route structure.. some are limited to 500ft.. some places
1000ft and some places.. 0.. but flying at 0 is tough... most times in the restricted areas and not the IR routes.. we stay between 200-500 I'm guessing if a "black shape" passed below him,.. and scud running.. that a rather large shadow passed above him and he thought something was below him where is Iron Mountain.. I'm thinking the Upper Peninsula of Michigan? Could have been a B-52 on approach.. but there were some training areas up there that they would get down to about 500ft or so. BT "MLenoch" wrote in message ... "BTIZ" wrote:Like I said.. I've seen a few.. had to alter course a couple of times.. but nothing really close. At least the ones I saw. I was about 50 miles behind a scud-running Stearman, who was inbound to Iron Mountain at 400 AGL. He called out that a 'black shape' just passed below him. He didn't see it coming or going. Always wanted to ask: how low do you go? Thx, VL |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
John Gaquin wrote, "... Loaded 747 would climb at about 273. ..."
Makes it all the more amazing that they seem to be standing still while climbing out! |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Ed
Your right. The Climb Corridors were only for ADC Interceptor Fighters. I negotiated several of them with FAA. With an unknown, the Interceptors on 5 minute alert could be scrambled and climb through commercial traffic altitudes without stopping to get FAA clearance. The Air Force (radar) assumed responsibility for clearance on scrambled aircraft and also training missions. Been out of ADC for a long time but believe the corridors would be eliminated when the base lost it's Air Defense Mission and Aircraft. Couldn't justify them then to FAA. Big John On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:49:32 -0700, Ed Rasimus wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:38:18 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: I believe military climb corridors ceased being charted in the sixties as well. And, even then they were almost exclusively related to active air defense scrambles. I entered military aviation in 1964 and operated until 1987 and never, not even once flew a tactical jet in a "military climb corridor." We flew published departure routes, later we flew SIDs, we flew published approaches, we operated in special use airspace including restricted areas and MOAs, we operated along low level routes, etc. We went fast a lot, too. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Updated List of Military Information-Exchange Forums | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 29th 04 02:16 AM |
22 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 24th 04 06:47 AM |
22 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 24th 04 06:46 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |