A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airspeed of military planes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 24th 04, 10:39 PM
Darkwing Duck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tetsuji Rai" wrote in message
s.com...
Airspeed limitation below 10000ft is usually 250kts unless you have been
authorized by the Administrator. However I guess it's a bit slow for
military fighters. So I am curious how fast military fighters fly in the
real world. I guess it's very dangerous military aircraft fly much fast
among civilian planes.



So how fast is short final in a F-14 or whatever? Always wanted to know.




  #32  
Old January 24th 04, 10:41 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"S. Sampson" wrote in message
news:1XBQb.6581$ce2.5743@okepread03...

There was a climb corridor out of Mt. Home well into the 80's.


I have Salt Lake City sectionals from 1969, 1972, and 1987, none of them
show a climb corridor at Mountain Home AFB. Nor does the current chart,
which can be viewed online at:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?R10722D27


  #33  
Old January 24th 04, 10:43 PM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Darrell" wrote in message news:5vBQb.65145

If the "Dash One" manual for the military airplane specifies a speed

higher
than 250 below 10,000' it's OK to fly that fast.


Same applies to civil craft. Loaded 747 would climb at about 273. We would
just advise ATC of climb speed. Were you required/requested to do that?

JG


  #34  
Old January 24th 04, 10:55 PM
S. Sampson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
"S. Sampson" wrote

There was a climb corridor out of Mt. Home well into the 80's.


I have Salt Lake City sectionals from 1969, 1972, and 1987, none of them
show a climb corridor at Mountain Home AFB. Nor does the current chart,
which can be viewed online at:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?R10722D27


I'm not sure what map it was. Do you have any highs and lows from
back then?


  #35  
Old January 24th 04, 11:02 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"S. Sampson" wrote in message
news:%JCQb.6585$ce2.6236@okepread03...

I'm not sure what map it was. Do you have any highs and lows from
back then?


Probably, but these things were charted on sectional charts.


  #36  
Old January 25th 04, 01:14 AM
Glenn Westfall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, it is a rule here too as we follow the 7110.65 just like in the
U.S. But it is a rule we don't always strickly enforce unless we have
to. I don't like them going that fast, but unless there is a reason
for me to slow them down, I don't usually bother. Now I would never
have one buz an airliner or civilian plane going that fast, but you
get the idea. I'm sure it is different with the FAA boys working in a
busy area, but for us over open water we don't care too much. Our
airspace goes out to 50 miles around Okinawa, so it is 90% over water.

Glenn


On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:18:22 GMT, "John R Weiss"
wrote:

"Glenn Westfall" wrote...
I'm an Air Force Air Traffic Controller and am currently working in
Okinawa, Japan. We have F-15's here at Kadena and it is not uncommon
for them to come back well above 400 Kts below 10,000.


How far out over the water does the 250-below-10 limit extend in Japan?


  #37  
Old January 25th 04, 01:28 AM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Darkwing Duck" wrote...

So how fast is short final in a F-14 or whatever? Always wanted to know.


125 to 140 knots, depending on airplane and landing weight.

  #38  
Old January 25th 04, 02:26 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

depends on the route structure.. some are limited to 500ft.. some places
1000ft and some places.. 0.. but flying at 0 is tough... most times in the
restricted areas and not the IR routes.. we stay between 200-500

I'm guessing if a "black shape" passed below him,.. and scud running.. that
a rather large shadow passed above him and he thought something was below
him

where is Iron Mountain.. I'm thinking the Upper Peninsula of Michigan? Could
have been a B-52 on approach.. but there were some training areas up there
that they would get down to about 500ft or so.

BT

"MLenoch" wrote in message
...
"BTIZ"


wrote:Like I said.. I've seen a few.. had to alter course a couple of

times..
but
nothing really close. At least the ones I saw.


I was about 50 miles behind a scud-running Stearman, who was inbound to

Iron
Mountain at 400 AGL. He called out that a 'black shape' just passed below

him.
He didn't see it coming or going. Always wanted to ask: how low do you go?
Thx,
VL



  #39  
Old January 25th 04, 04:05 AM
Jon Woellhaf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Gaquin wrote, "... Loaded 747 would climb at about 273. ..."

Makes it all the more amazing that they seem to be standing still while
climbing out!


  #40  
Old January 25th 04, 05:42 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed

Your right. The Climb Corridors were only for ADC Interceptor
Fighters. I negotiated several of them with FAA.

With an unknown, the Interceptors on 5 minute alert could be scrambled
and climb through commercial traffic altitudes without stopping to get
FAA clearance. The Air Force (radar) assumed responsibility for
clearance on scrambled aircraft and also training missions.

Been out of ADC for a long time but believe the corridors would be
eliminated when the base lost it's Air Defense Mission and Aircraft.
Couldn't justify them then to FAA.

Big John


On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:49:32 -0700, Ed Rasimus
wrote:

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:38:18 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


I believe military climb corridors ceased being charted in the sixties as
well.

And, even then they were almost exclusively related to active air
defense scrambles. I entered military aviation in 1964 and operated
until 1987 and never, not even once flew a tactical jet in a "military
climb corridor."

We flew published departure routes, later we flew SIDs, we flew
published approaches, we operated in special use airspace including
restricted areas and MOAs, we operated along low level routes, etc.

We went fast a lot, too.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Updated List of Military Information-Exchange Forums Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 November 29th 04 02:16 AM
22 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 August 24th 04 06:47 AM
22 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 24th 04 06:46 AM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.