If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Keith Willshaw wrote:
"vicky89" wrote in message om... "Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "The Blue Max" wrote in message s.com... Yep, although if the UK had been removed from hostilities, it might just about have been feasible to get a GZ into position to launch some sort of Doolittle-type sneak raid on the USEC. I saw a documentary that said the Germans were building a submersible trailer for a U-boat that could launch a V-2. They quite possibly did. According to reports in 1944, three U-boats U-24, U-9 and U-19 equipped with rocket launchers were allegedly deployed against Soviet harbor facilities and moored ships during the German retreat. If this is true it was the first combat use of a submarine-launched missile. It would have to be a dammed small missile. Those were type IIb boats and at only 140 ft long and displacing around 300 tons they didnt have a lot of disposable space. If they fired anything bigger than a Panzerschreck I'd be amazed. Some interesting info he http://www.prinzeugen.com/V2.htm -- Blinky Linux RU 297263 Spam: The Boulder Pledge http://snurl.com/bpledge Digest: Best of Internet Oracularities http://snurl.com/dig_oracle |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Blinky the Shark" wrote in message ... Keith Willshaw wrote: Those were type IIb boats and at only 140 ft long and displacing around 300 tons they didnt have a lot of disposable space. If they fired anything bigger than a Panzerschreck I'd be amazed. Some interesting info he http://www.prinzeugen.com/V2.htm So they jury rigged a small tactical rocket launcher on the decks of three small coastal submarines, an act born of desperation no doubt since all 3 boats were destroyed when the Soviets overran Konstanza in August/Sept 1944 U-9 was sunk by aircraft at Konstanza U-19 was scuttled off Turkey in Sept 1944 U-24 was scuttled at Konstanza Keith |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ...
"The Blue Max" wrote in message s.com... Yep, although if the UK had been removed from hostilities, it might just about have been feasible to get a GZ into position to launch some sort of Doolittle-type sneak raid on the USEC. I saw a documentary that said the Germans were building a submersible trailer for a U-boat that could launch a V-2. Plan being to tow hem across the Atlantic and launch into the United States. Si Yes, Prufstand XII of which one was actually constructed plus two others nearing completion at Stettin. Russians built some of the towed missile launchers after the war. Rob |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
snip If they fired anything bigger than a Panzerschreck I'd be amazed. Some interesting info he http://www.prinzeugen.com/V2.htm So they jury rigged a small tactical rocket launcher on the decks of three small coastal submarines, an act born of desperation no doubt since all 3 boats were destroyed when the Soviets overran Konstanza in August/Sept 1944 U-9 was sunk by aircraft at Konstanza U-19 was scuttled off Turkey in Sept 1944 U-24 was scuttled at Konstanza Keith Well the rockets launchers certainly seemed to be larger than a Panzerschreck. Now we come to the important part - were you amazed (as you said you would be) when you read that? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Tuollaf43" wrote in message m... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... snip If they fired anything bigger than a Panzerschreck I'd be amazed. Some interesting info he http://www.prinzeugen.com/V2.htm So they jury rigged a small tactical rocket launcher on the decks of three small coastal submarines, an act born of desperation no doubt since all 3 boats were destroyed when the Soviets overran Konstanza in August/Sept 1944 U-9 was sunk by aircraft at Konstanza U-19 was scuttled off Turkey in Sept 1944 U-24 was scuttled at Konstanza Keith Well the rockets launchers certainly seemed to be larger than a Panzerschreck. Now we come to the important part - were you amazed (as you said you would be) when you read that? Yep , its always nice to learn something new. Keith |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
snip Yep , its always nice to learn something new. Keith Well thats a relief. You know you were in great danger of becoming an Hermoine Granger there. You always seem to have a opinion on every subject. Backed by three references. And whats worse is, you'd be right most of the time. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Tuollaf43 wrote:
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... snip Yep , its always nice to learn something new. Keith Well thats a relief. You know you were in great danger of becoming an Hermoine Granger there. You always seem to have a opinion on every subject. Backed by three references. And whats worse is, you'd be right most of the time. Well honestly, if you devoted as much attention as Keith does to reading "The Standard Book of Flying (Grades 1 through 7)," "Rec.Aviation.Military: A History," "Aerobatics Through the Ages," and "Fantastic Bombers and Where to Find Them," among others, you'd know nearly as much as Keith does ;-) Guy |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
To judge from the types of aircraft developed for the Graf Zeppelin, the
catapults should have been able to launch a V1 unless it weighed much more than, say, a Ju87. What does the French quotation at the end of your message mean? Is it in the Languedoc dialect? Where is it from? Gordon McLaughlin "The Blue Max" wrote in message s.com... Ignoring the political, economic, and strategic issues around the matter, what would have been the technical problems involved in launching V-1s from a completed CV Graf Zeppelin? I assume one would be limited to city-sized targets; would the sort of catapult fitted to GZ have been capable of hefting a V-1 into the air? -- Et qui rit des cures d'Oc? De Meuse raines, houp! de cloques. De quelles loques ce turqe coin. Et ne d'anes ni rennes, Ecuries des cures d'Oc. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"The Blue Max" wrote in message s.com... "Gordon McLaughlin" wrote in message ... To judge from the types of aircraft developed for the Graf Zeppelin, the catapults should have been able to launch a V1 unless it weighed much more than, say, a Ju87. That's what I figure, as long as there's no compelling other reason (like setting up the compass, for instance). My reason for asking was that I'm programming an old PC wargame to simulate a Doolittle raid on New York in about 1943-4 by a pair of German CVs. The assumptions are that the Commonwealth and USSR have capitulated in succession, the IJN is in need of a diversion, and the two German CVs, which can't fight a US CV, are instead launching the most irritating raid possible that's sure to force the USN to pull carriers out of the Pacific. If the commonwealth has capitulated why arent you launching attacks from Canada ? Assuming they can do 25 to 30 knots for 10 hours or so and the V-1s can fly about 250 miles, they could presumably approach during daylight, launch at dusk, and retreat, thus ensuring that they're out of range of effective land-based air throughout. Hardly. Virtually any land based twin or 4 engined bombers could reach them with escort from P-38's. The catalina's would pick them up a long way out. All they have to worry about is submarines, so I figure one carries a normal air group and the other the V-1s. Ideally, if a V-1 could be fired without reconfiguring the whole flight deck, they both would. I'd imagine you could flat-pack a V-1 quite small. Why dont they have to wonder about the US Atlantic fleet ? Keith |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Gordon McLaughlin" wrote in message
... To judge from the types of aircraft developed for the Graf Zeppelin, the catapults should have been able to launch a V1 unless it weighed much more than, say, a Ju87. That's what I figure, as long as there's no compelling other reason (like setting up the compass, for instance). My reason for asking was that I'm programming an old PC wargame to simulate a Doolittle raid on New York in about 1943-4 by a pair of German CVs. The assumptions are that the Commonwealth and USSR have capitulated in succession, the IJN is in need of a diversion, and the two German CVs, which can't fight a US CV, are instead launching the most irritating raid possible that's sure to force the USN to pull carriers out of the Pacific. Assuming they can do 25 to 30 knots for 10 hours or so and the V-1s can fly about 250 miles, they could presumably approach during daylight, launch at dusk, and retreat, thus ensuring that they're out of range of effective land-based air throughout. All they have to worry about is submarines, so I figure one carries a normal air group and the other the V-1s. Ideally, if a V-1 could be fired without reconfiguring the whole flight deck, they both would. I'd imagine you could flat-pack a V-1 quite small. What does the French quotation at the end of your message mean? Is it in the Languedoc dialect? Where is it from? You have to read it aloud. Et qui rit des cures d'Oc? hickory, dickory, dock De Meuse raines, houp! de cloques. the mouse ran up the clock De quelles loques ce turqe coin. the clock struck one Et ne d'anes ni rennes, and down he ran Ecuries des cures d'Oc. hickory dickory dock. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |