If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
NTSB prelim report out
"Doug Haluza" wrote in message
oups.com... Paul Buchanan wrote: I have a question which the report doesn't clarify. What type of airspace was the glider and bizjet flying in at the time? Controlled or VFR? Paul Buchanan http://www.glidingstuff.co.nz Should have been class G. Glider was VFR, Jet was IFR in VMC. Doug.. wouldn't it be Class E above 14,500MSL? BT |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
NTSB prelim report out
Paul Buchanan wrote:
I have a question which the report doesn't clarify. What type of airspace was the glider and bizjet flying in at the time? Controlled or VFR? Almost certainly IFR as they were descending from positive control altitudes. It's rare (but not unheard) for bizjets to not be operating IFR. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
NTSB prelim report out
BTIZ wrote:
Paul, in the US, it can be "IFR controlled" and "VFR", where VFR aircraft such as the glider can roam freely in VFR (Visual Flight Rules) or VMC (Visual Meteorological Conditions) in the same airspace that IFR ATC controlled traffic can be, the altitudes reported have been 13,500 to 16,500 MSL when they hit. Actually there is a third category: IFR in uncontrolled airspace. ATC can not provide control in class G airspace. However, there is precious little of that in the at any altitude above a few thousand feet AGL. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
NTSB prelim report out
I have a question which the report doesn't clarify.
What type of airspace was the glider and bizjet flying in at the time? Controlled or VFR? Almost certainly IFR as they were descending from positive control altitudes. It's rare (but not unheard) for bizjets to not be operating IFR. I'm sure you speak only of the BizJet.. the glider was VFR and not under ATC control and not required to be under ATC control. BT |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
NTSB prelim report out
Greg,
Very interesting indeed. If you have a transponder in your aircraft, it needs to be ON. FAR91.215.c.(unless I am reading it wrong).. Much different that not having a transponder, definitely NOT required in that airspace. Lucky that no one was killed. I feel sorry for the glider owner that cared enough about safety to equip his sailplane with a transponder yet it wasn't used during the flight. Dean |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 19th 05 02:19 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |