A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mountain High Cannula/Mask?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 2nd 19, 01:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

Tango Eight wrote on 10/1/2019 3:47 PM:
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 3:44:11 PM UTC-4, RR wrote:
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 6:45:06 AM UTC-4, John McLaughlin wrote:
Does everyone stick to the 18k limit for the cannula and 25k for the mask,

or are these limits considered advisory only?


The legalitys are not so clear, but practically it is about remembering to
breathe only with your nose with the cannula. Something I felt i could do,
and so far have remembered. It is much easier to hydrate and communicate
with the cannula. Just don't forget...

RR


There are several reasons any given person might not breathe well on a cannula
at high altitude, mouth breathing is only one. Here's another: It is really
easy to hyperventilate on a cannula at 20+K. Trivially easy in fact.. If you
must use a cannula above 18K (which I recommend against), do not skimp on the
O2, don't use a dumb ass "oxy-miser" anything above 18K. Turn up the flow. If
in doubt, turn it up some more. Not a bad idea to monitor heart rate as well
as O2 saturation. Tachycardia is reliable indicator of breathing problems, and
it will catch hyperventilation (O2 saturation will not, key word alkalosis).

It's much easier to breathe well (and reliably) on a mask, provided the mask
fits and seals acceptably well. If you aren't breathing well, hydration and
communication are going to cease to matter.


Does it matter which face mask is used? The one that came with the Mountain High
EDS units I have is very basic, with a very small cavity, so I think it would not
increase the amount of CO2 you breathe. I'm assuming it's the CO2 content that's
the important factor - is that true?

They do have a mask with a rebreather bag, so perhaps that's the one you should use?

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1
  #12  
Old October 2nd 19, 03:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tango Eight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 962
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 8:52:12 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Tango Eight wrote on 10/1/2019 3:47 PM:
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 3:44:11 PM UTC-4, RR wrote:
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 6:45:06 AM UTC-4, John McLaughlin wrote:
Does everyone stick to the 18k limit for the cannula and 25k for the mask,

or are these limits considered advisory only?

The legalitys are not so clear, but practically it is about remembering to
breathe only with your nose with the cannula. Something I felt i could do,
and so far have remembered. It is much easier to hydrate and communicate
with the cannula. Just don't forget...

RR


There are several reasons any given person might not breathe well on a cannula
at high altitude, mouth breathing is only one. Here's another: It is really
easy to hyperventilate on a cannula at 20+K. Trivially easy in fact.. If you
must use a cannula above 18K (which I recommend against), do not skimp on the
O2, don't use a dumb ass "oxy-miser" anything above 18K. Turn up the flow. If
in doubt, turn it up some more. Not a bad idea to monitor heart rate as well
as O2 saturation. Tachycardia is reliable indicator of breathing problems, and
it will catch hyperventilation (O2 saturation will not, key word alkalosis).

It's much easier to breathe well (and reliably) on a mask, provided the mask
fits and seals acceptably well. If you aren't breathing well, hydration and
communication are going to cease to matter.


Does it matter which face mask is used? The one that came with the Mountain High
EDS units I have is very basic, with a very small cavity, so I think it would not
increase the amount of CO2 you breathe. I'm assuming it's the CO2 content that's
the important factor - is that true?

They do have a mask with a rebreather bag, so perhaps that's the one you should use?

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1


I've had good luck with (decent quality, form fitting) re-breather mask systems on constant flow. I don't breathe well on the EDS / cannula system at high altitude. My breathing tends to get sort of "lazy" by 16 - 18K and I find I have to use one of the higher delivery modes to maintain high saturation. Re-breather mask fixes that and CO2 seems the most likely reason.

I have not tried the MH masks. I've seen one (blue rubber, apparently decent quality) that looked like it might be worth a try.

Minor rant: *Any* hard plastic mask (Aerox & Mountain High are both guilty of selling such) that looks like an emergency medical single use mask has no place in the cockpit... you would honestly just be better off sucking on the end of the hose. I've seen these things literally fall apart before first use as someone unwrapped the sealed plastic bag it was shipped in. It's completely unconscionable that anyone would sell you something this crummy as part of a life support system.

While I'm at it, I'd encourage folks to take a skeptical look at their oxygen delivery gear. The old style Aerox needle valve/rotameter is notorious for breaking under normal handling, as are the old green plastic barbed fittings. Expect anything plastic or rubber to become more fragile when cold soaked, don't expect that these O2 system manufacturers have done any durability or cold soak testing of their products: they obviously haven't. Again... I find it completely unconscionable that anyone sells such rubbish for life support purposes, but it's out there, beware.


T8


  #13  
Old October 2nd 19, 08:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
RR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 82
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 7:17:16 AM UTC-4, Tango Eight wrote:
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 3:44:11 PM UTC-4, RR wrote:

The legalitys are not so clear [...]


I should have been more specific, the legalities in experimental aircraft (many if not most of our gliders) are not so clear.

And I am sorry if I implied a recommendation. I am just speaking of my own experience (18 years of diamond and Lenny climes) accompanied with, pulse oximeters (from back when they were expensive) and backup systems at hand.

I totally agree with T8 about not scrimping on the Ox. No using the oxisaver flow levels. But for me, with full beard and mustache, I know what is being delivered to my nose, where I would be concerned about leakage from a mask.

Ox at altitude is not something to take lightly. And single place aircraft require real diligence in acquiring the knowledge about your personal reaction to hypoxia. Know your symptoms, and learn to react quickly.

One thing that is very important to know is the Ox saturation curve has a "kink" in it at 25k. Flights to 24k are like scuba diving, flights above are like cave diving. You need to have redundant systems. Everyone knows climbers have ascended Everest without Ox and think they can descend if something goes wrong, but the amount of "useful conciseness" you have above 27k is measured in seconds not minutes.

RR



FAR 23.1447 spells it out (for certificated aircraft). Above 18K the requirement is for a mask that covers nose and mouth.

The fact that some people can get away with a cannula at 26K (once) does not mean that this is a sound practice. We've had two hypoxia incidents (that I know of) at Mt Washington due to pilots emulating certain old timers. Physiology varies. Physical fitness doesn't seem to be a factor (in fact casual observation suggests the reverse :-)).

T8


  #14  
Old October 2nd 19, 09:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 281
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?


https://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/...%2061-107A.pdf

Page 13 is the table of useful consciousness versus altitude, and is surrounded by a pretty good discussion.

Above 22k, note that the time to descend can be longer than the time to think. So a backup system and being willing and able to come down really fast need to be thought through beforehand.

RR is right, something happens in the 20's. Perhaps the partial pressure of O2 in the blood and air get close?





  #15  
Old October 12th 19, 02:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,099
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

On Wednesday, October 2, 2019 at 2:02:08 PM UTC-6, wrote:
https://www.faa.gov/pilots/training/...%2061-107A.pdf

Page 13 is the table of useful consciousness versus altitude, and is surrounded by a pretty good discussion.

Above 22k, note that the time to descend can be longer than the time to think. So a backup system and being willing and able to come down really fast need to be thought through beforehand.

RR is right, something happens in the 20's. Perhaps the partial pressure of O2 in the blood and air get close?


This article is quite interesting.
https://www.airspacemag.com/military...eet-117615369/
  #16  
Old October 12th 19, 08:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
waremark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

I have only ever once been above 20k, and on all other occasions have usèd a canula apparently successfully. On that occasion I was planning to go higher and so used the mask which came with my EDS kit. It didn't seal well and I felt I had to keep pressing it against my face. I suggest trying out your equipment in advance of a flight where you expect to go high.
  #17  
Old October 12th 19, 09:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

Of note:

I was going a good job with my cannula. I kept an eye on my pulse ox, things were going well.

Started eating some trail mix for lunch.... oh yeah, mouth breathing. Pulse Ox was headed south in a hurry.

Just something to think about. I had to be extra vigilant to not stuff my face all at once, and when taking time to drink and eat... consciously make sure to take good hits off the O2 with my nose.

JP

  #19  
Old October 12th 19, 01:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Daly[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 718
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 7:00:05 AM UTC-4, Maxx Ruff wrote:
At 08:09 12 October 2019, wrote:
Of note:

I was going a good job with my cannula. I kept an eye on my pulse

ox,
things were going well.

Started eating some trail mix for lunch.... oh yeah, mouth breathing.
Pulse Ox was headed south in a hurry.

Just something to think about. I had to be extra vigilant to not stuff

my
face all at once, and when taking time to drink and eat... consciously

make
sure to take good hits off the O2 with my nose.

JP


Bought an 'FDA Approved' Finger Pulse Oximeter Blood Oxygen
Saturation SPO2 Heart Rate O2 Patient Monitor from fleabay to try out
($25-ish).

Although it was a bit clunky sitting on the end of my finger, it appeared
to work reliably well on the ground (slight overcast?) or airborne under
cloud.

At altitude it repeatedly failed in very bright sunlight. (Measures light
absorption of the blood in your finger)
Whenever I uncovered my hand in bright sunlight to read the display it
immediately lost the plot. Wonderful!

As an experiment I covered the device and part of my finger in the foil
from a snack bar leaving the display (mostly) uncovered, it worked
much better but was even more inconvenient.

Don't buy cheap??! (YMMV)

MR


Mine has LEDs and works well. Remember that when you get cold, blood's routed to the core, away from hands/feet, so your reading might be off a bit.
  #20  
Old October 14th 19, 03:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
danlj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 124
Default Mountain High Cannula/Mask?

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 6:00:05 AM UTC-5, Maxx Ruff wrote:
Bought an 'FDA Approved' Finger Pulse Oximeter Blood Oxygen
Saturation SPO2 Heart Rate O2 Patient Monitor from fleabay to try out
($25-ish).

Although it was a bit clunky sitting on the end of my finger, it appeared
to work reliably well on the ground (slight overcast?) or airborne under
cloud.

At altitude it repeatedly failed in very bright sunlight. (Measures light
absorption of the blood in your finger)
Whenever I uncovered my hand in bright sunlight to read the display it
immediately lost the plot. Wonderful!

As an experiment I covered the device and part of my finger in the foil
from a snack bar leaving the display (mostly) uncovered, it worked
much better but was even more inconvenient.

Don't buy cheap??! (YMMV)

MR


Yes. SoaringRx on pulse ox accuracy
https://www.danlj.org/~danlj/Soaring...-p18-20-22.pdf
Geez! Hard to believe that I wrote that 7 years ago...
and on high-altitude breathing in general
https://www.danlj.org/~danlj/Soaring...ygen-risks.pdf
Enjoy!
DrDan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mountain High O2 [email protected] Soaring 2 April 26th 22 10:27 AM
FS: Aerox Regulator, Cannula and Mask George Haeh Soaring 14 April 8th 16 07:13 AM
FS - Mountain High EDS O2-D1 [email protected] Soaring 0 March 26th 16 11:14 PM
Cannula vs Mask (FAR) Stefan Piloting 9 October 31st 07 11:06 AM
Mountain High Rod Soaring 3 October 8th 03 08:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.