If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Andover - Aeroflex, NJ For Sale
Hi everyone...
A co-worker jokingly asked me if I wanted to buy an airport, so I jokingly replied, "sure!" It turns out the airport that's for sale is Andover-Aeroflex airport in Sussex County, NJ, one of the most charming strips of pavement this side of the Mississippi. The runway is bordered by two lakes, and is surrounded by a wonderful park and lots of rustic charm. Asking price: $9.8 million. The thing that caught my eye was the actual advertisement for the property, which reads as follows: "Property approx 147 acres w/a functional airport. Former farmer's market, 3 homes, beautiful lake, part of the parcel, 37 acres across the road zoned for residential. Property sold as a package but already subdivided. A few feet from Rt. 206 w/great exposure. Zoning is industrial/aviation great for flying use, schools, churches, agriculture, corporate offices, large store chains, rest homes, restaurants and more. Call for details. Exclusive office listing." It's the latter half of the ad that has me concerned, talking about "schools, churches, ..., corporate offices, large store chains". Is that something that might threaten this airport? I know the current state of affairs in this country is that developers basically get their way no matter the cost to the environment, public, or any particular group of people (in this case, pilots and open space advocates). Any realistic chance that, when the airport is sold, somebody could come in and develop it to the scale that the airport is no longer usable? -- Guy Elden Jr. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Guy Elden Jr wrote:
Any realistic chance that, when the airport is sold, somebody could come in and develop it to the scale that the airport is no longer usable? Absolutely. In fact, the airport is about the only reasonably flat land in that tract, so it would probably be the first part developed if someone wanted to put in a mall or office park. I thought Andover was part of the State park system? George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Guy Elden Jr" wrote:
A co-worker jokingly asked me if I wanted to buy an airport, so I jokingly replied, "sure!" It turns out the airport that's for sale is Andover-Aeroflex airport in Sussex County, NJ, one of the most charming strips of pavement this side of the Mississippi. Not 50 miles north of there, two other airports are being threatened. Monticello, NY has been sold to a developer and it looks like it will disappear. After the owner died, Wurtsboro, NY was also sold to a developer (or an option was sold - it's not really clear). The developer held a meeting last week and told the pilots that he was wanted to move the main runway, eliminate the parallel grass runway and the 3 crossing grass runways, dig a 400' deep gravel pit, then fill it with water, build luxury homes, add a ski chalet at the north end and horseback riding stables at the south end, "move" the hangars, eliminate the overruns, etc. It isn't even clear if the promises to keep a runway can be enforced. The town offered to buy the airport for more than the developer offered, but that offer was refused. Apparently there's bad blood between the town and some of the heirs who control the estate. At least one heir who lives on the property wants it to stay an airport with open surrounding space and would have been happy to accept the higher offer from the town, but doesn't control the estatel. The town is now considering using eminent domain to preserve the airport and open space that abuts the canal and wetlands. There's lots of backing from all the wetland/open space/green groups, and from several NY politicians to preserve the airport and open space, but the developer has the inside track. There is a pilots group formed, but the developer has control of the airport and is making their life difficult. For those who often rail against the FAA - note that they will be providing 95% of the money to the town, and the only reason the airport has a chance is that the FAA paid for runway improvements about 8 years ago and locked it up as an airport for 20 years (12 more now). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This cannot be Aeroflex, which is owned by the State Forest Service,
but rather Sussex which has been on the market for quite some time now. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
After thinking a bit more, it is probably Newton Airport, just off 206.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, you know, I might have made a mistake in thinking it was
Aeroflex. The ad I saw is posted in "Homes and Estates" (Morris/Sussex/Warren Edition), Volume 13, Issue 16 (Aug 10 - Aug 23, 2005). It's one of those free real estate magazines you can find at grocery stores. The ad I saw is at the bottom of page 38, and now that I look at it again, is titled "Andover Airport". So it could very well be Newton instead (which I've never been to, but will be checking out very soon now!) The picture in the ad shows a runway ending at the foot of a lake, so I assumed it was Aeroflex, which has a similar configuration. I guess it's a good thing I made the mistake while still parked safely on the ground. -- Guy Elden Jr. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Aug 2005 07:06:29 -0700, "Guy Elden Jr"
wrote: "schools, churches, ..., corporate offices, large store chains" If you have driven to the airport, then you know that the access road hooks around the end of the runway, between it and the lake, and that traffic is supposed to stop and look to make sure a plane isn't taking off or on final, then proceed. The access road leads not only to the airport buildings, paralleling the runway, but to a small housing development straight ahead. I can imagine how long this would last with a school back there! -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:42:04 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: I thought Andover was part of the State park system? I think it's a private inholding, which probably is what justifies the price. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|