If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TSA - another indignity for permanent residents
I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a
schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Just after I sent to r.a.p, I realized I should have x-posted to a more
relevant group. Hoping this can catch any thread that develops. -- David Brooks "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In a previous article, "David Brooks" said:
"David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. Amazing. I've briefly scanned it to see if there was an exemption for us permanent residents, but everywhere I look I see "aliens", not "non-resident aliens". Hey, I thought I passed my security checks when I got fingerprinted and had to provide proof that I had no outstanding warrants back in Canada. This sucks. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ You've got to love a newsreader with a menu option named "Kill this Author". Does it work? And if so, is the death traceable? Nah, but Dave the Resurrector will just bring 'em back again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have a question....
Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... ; - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter MacPherson" wrote in message
news:Zwl4d.26699$wV.2744@attbi_s54... I have a question.... Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. My reply from Ian Twombly at AOPA says they understand flight review and instrument refresher are included, although they don't fit the model of "applying for a course of training". By "refresher" I think he referred to my question about "three and a hold", not just IPC. Actually, the whole model adopted by the rule is that you go to a school, apply for training, finish it, and you're done. I think of myself as a customer of the flight school who must happens to be taking lessons towards my Commercial, with occasional too-long layoffs, and with the occasional FR or instrument refresher thrown in. The $130 doesn't include the estimated $75 cost of fingerprinting. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... ; - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Did you notice that in the local news coverage of the Oregon attorney who
was incorrectly tabbed as a terrorist in the Spanish train bombing, it was stated that he had taken flight lessons? Oh, the horror!!! Bob Gardner "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:Zwl4d.26699$wV.2744@attbi_s54... I have a question.... Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. My reply from Ian Twombly at AOPA says they understand flight review and instrument refresher are included, although they don't fit the model of "applying for a course of training". By "refresher" I think he referred to my question about "three and a hold", not just IPC. Actually, the whole model adopted by the rule is that you go to a school, apply for training, finish it, and you're done. I think of myself as a customer of the flight school who must happens to be taking lessons towards my Commercial, with occasional too-long layoffs, and with the occasional FR or instrument refresher thrown in. The $130 doesn't include the estimated $75 cost of fingerprinting. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... ; - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How long do you think before all pilots wind up on some
"watch list". Maybe we already are.... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... Did you notice that in the local news coverage of the Oregon attorney who was incorrectly tabbed as a terrorist in the Spanish train bombing, it was stated that he had taken flight lessons? Oh, the horror!!! Bob Gardner "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:Zwl4d.26699$wV.2744@attbi_s54... I have a question.... Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. My reply from Ian Twombly at AOPA says they understand flight review and instrument refresher are included, although they don't fit the model of "applying for a course of training". By "refresher" I think he referred to my question about "three and a hold", not just IPC. Actually, the whole model adopted by the rule is that you go to a school, apply for training, finish it, and you're done. I think of myself as a customer of the flight school who must happens to be taking lessons towards my Commercial, with occasional too-long layoffs, and with the occasional FR or instrument refresher thrown in. The $130 doesn't include the estimated $75 cost of fingerprinting. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... ; - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"David Brooks" wrote in message
... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. Ugh. I want to know when these kinds of regulations are going to start being implemented for the boat training industry. And the truck driving industry. And the driver education industry. How about the railroad training industry? IMHO, part of the problem is that's *only* been aviation that's been singled out, and we're just not big enough to make a difference. No one else cares about us, and we're not a large enough constituency for any politician to take us seriously. Seems like our best bet would be to simply start lobbying Congress and the TSA to close up the "security holes" that exist in all the *other* transportation industries. Once they start suffering under the same rules, then we'll have some seriously significant allies for the fight. Someone remind me...how long did it take the country to get through McCarthyism? Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... Someone remind me...how long did it take the country to get through McCarthyism? It IS a rather bizarre society. Guns are encouraged. I guess they are never misused.... Aviation is tightly controlled, more tightly every passing week. I guess aviation must be bad. -- *** A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. *** - Ariel Durant 1898-1981 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
... In a previous article, "David Brooks" said: "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...=19147&searchT ype=docket. Amazing. I've briefly scanned it to see if there was an exemption for us permanent residents, but everywhere I look I see "aliens", not "non-resident aliens". Hey, I thought I passed my security checks when I got fingerprinted and had to provide proof that I had no outstanding warrants back in Canada. This sucks. There's a beautiful paragraph in the analysis. "TSA does not expect a significant impact on the overall demand for U.S. flight training...the IFR only impacts alien candidates for U.S. flight training..." False. "...and the population of alien candidates is small relative to the number of U.S. flight students..." 18% is small? OK, it's less than one fifth, but it is significant, and higher than I would have expected. Where did I get that 18% number? From a previous page of the IFR, and it comes from the FAA. "...the impact on demand will not be significant because U.S. flight training is considered to be the global standard, and it is comparatively less expensive to obtain a pilot's certificate in the U.S...." This seems to assume that all noncitizen pilots are traveling here for training; the argument is irrelevant to people like Paul and me. I'd like to know how many of that 18% (an FAA number) are residents versus visitors. -- David Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|