If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#411
|
|||
|
|||
White Foragers Report Threat Of Black Looters
NEW ORLEANS-Throughout the Gulf Coast, Caucasian suburbanites attempting to gather food and drink in the shattered wreckage of shopping districts have reported seeing African=ADAmericans "looting snacks and beer from damaged businesses." "I was in the abandoned Wal-Mart gathering an air mattress so I could float out the potato chips, beef jerky, and Budweiser I'd managed to find," said white survivor Lars Wrightson, who had carefully selected foodstuffs whose salt and alcohol content provide protection against contamination. "Then I look up, and I see a whole family of [African-Americans] going straight for the booze. Hell, you could see they had already looted a fortune in diapers." Radio stations still in operation are advising store owners and white people in the affected areas to locate firearms in sporting-goods stores in order to protect themselves against marauding blacks looting gun shops. |
#412
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote:
When the budget for improving the levees was cut by the Feds, New Orleans tried over and over again to get the money reinstated as a basic safety measure for the city. Bringing the issue to a vote in the city would have done nothing to free up the federal funds, which is where the money had to come from. What would have happened if the citizens of N.O. had raised funds to reinforce their levees themselves? *Gasp!* Imagine! Unheard of, I know, but couldn't the locals have actually taken action for themselves? Well, as I understand the situation, it's far more complicated than that, and simply "fixing" the levees is insufficient. The problems N.O. has are a result of many of the Corps programs to contain the Mississippi, which have resulted in drying of large areas of former swamp, and subsidence in the entire delta through soil contraction. The lack of flooding has also cut off the supply of silt that historically built up the delta. These changes, along with the pumping of domestic water from wells, has exposed the city to storm surges, which would previously have not been a problem. Specifically, many barrier islands that provided protection have simply disappeared below the gulf; Large areas of swampland between the city and gulf have flooded, effectively moving the gulf closer to the city; The city itself has subsided, which further exposed many areas that were previously above water; The subsidence has lowered the effective level of the dikes, and the protection they previously afforded. The $15 billion program the Corps proposed involved a number of actions that were intended to protect many more communities than just New Orleans from storm surges. One was to allow the river to again flood areas of the delta to rebuild the barrier islands, reduce subsidence, and redeposit silt to build up the land. Another was the construction of a gate at the entrance to Lake Pontchartrain to control the storm surge. The gate would be closed as a surge approached, and would significantly reduce the amount of water entering the lake, reducing the risk to all communities around the lake. Finally, there were improvements to the dikes and barrier walls on the north side of the city to protect against whatever storm surge remained with the protection of the lake entrance gate. As you can see, many of the problems New Orleans had were as a result of water management policies that benefitted everyone on the river, to the detriment of N.O. Some of the problems were self-induced. Full protection of the city requires a systemic approach on the part of the Corps, and simply shoring up the dikes is only part of an overall package necessary to reestablish adequate protection. |
#413
|
|||
|
|||
Flyingmonk wrote:
White Foragers Report Threat Of Black Looters I smell an Onion... |
#414
|
|||
|
|||
You smell correctly.
|
#415
|
|||
|
|||
The items you list are a problem but they are NOT the problem NO is facing
this time around. NO is below the level of the surrounding water. They build levees to hold the water back and to create canals to pump what water does make it in, out. Two of those levees failed. Neither of the levees that failed were on the river they both were on canals that fed the lake. "James Robinson" wrote in message . 97.142... "Jay Honeck" wrote: When the budget for improving the levees was cut by the Feds, New Orleans tried over and over again to get the money reinstated as a basic safety measure for the city. Bringing the issue to a vote in the city would have done nothing to free up the federal funds, which is where the money had to come from. What would have happened if the citizens of N.O. had raised funds to reinforce their levees themselves? *Gasp!* Imagine! Unheard of, I know, but couldn't the locals have actually taken action for themselves? Well, as I understand the situation, it's far more complicated than that, and simply "fixing" the levees is insufficient. The problems N.O. has are a result of many of the Corps programs to contain the Mississippi, which have resulted in drying of large areas of former swamp, and subsidence in the entire delta through soil contraction. The lack of flooding has also cut off the supply of silt that historically built up the delta. These changes, along with the pumping of domestic water from wells, has exposed the city to storm surges, which would previously have not been a problem. Specifically, many barrier islands that provided protection have simply disappeared below the gulf; Large areas of swampland between the city and gulf have flooded, effectively moving the gulf closer to the city; The city itself has subsided, which further exposed many areas that were previously above water; The subsidence has lowered the effective level of the dikes, and the protection they previously afforded. The $15 billion program the Corps proposed involved a number of actions that were intended to protect many more communities than just New Orleans from storm surges. One was to allow the river to again flood areas of the delta to rebuild the barrier islands, reduce subsidence, and redeposit silt to build up the land. Another was the construction of a gate at the entrance to Lake Pontchartrain to control the storm surge. The gate would be closed as a surge approached, and would significantly reduce the amount of water entering the lake, reducing the risk to all communities around the lake. Finally, there were improvements to the dikes and barrier walls on the north side of the city to protect against whatever storm surge remained with the protection of the lake entrance gate. As you can see, many of the problems New Orleans had were as a result of water management policies that benefitted everyone on the river, to the detriment of N.O. Some of the problems were self-induced. Full protection of the city requires a systemic approach on the part of the Corps, and simply shoring up the dikes is only part of an overall package necessary to reestablish adequate protection. |
#416
|
|||
|
|||
Most, if not all the fault, with failing to upgrade Levees lies with
the Louisiana Congressional Delegation. There a report in today's WSJ that they were able to get a $400,000 for the Mississippi River Trail and Bikepath and $3,200,000 for bike and pedestrian crossings of the Washington-Palmetto Canal in this year's highway bill. Obviously, the locals have a problem setting priorities and would resent any attempt by the Bush administration to force them to rethink where Federal monies are best spent. "James Robinson" wrote in message When the budget for improving the levees was cut by the Feds, New Orleans tried over and over again to get the money reinstated as a basic safety measure for the city. Bringing the issue to a vote in the city would have done nothing to free up the federal funds, which is where the money had to come from. |
#417
|
|||
|
|||
The Industrial Canal levee failure is believed to be caused by a very
large barge that broke loose. "Gig 601XL Builder" wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:8A%Te.27418$7f5.18975@okepread01... The items you list are a problem but they are NOT the problem NO is facing this time around. NO is below the level of the surrounding water. They build levees to hold the water back and to create canals to pump what water does make it in, out. Two of those levees failed. Neither of the levees that failed were on the river they both were on canals that fed the lake. |
#418
|
|||
|
|||
sfb wrote:
The Industrial Canal levee failure is believed to be caused by a very large barge that broke loose. Its actually been draining the city... |
#419
|
|||
|
|||
"sfb" wrote:
Most, if not all the fault, with failing to upgrade Levees lies with the Louisiana Congressional Delegation. There a report in today's WSJ that they were able to get a $400,000 for the Mississippi River Trail and Bikepath and $3,200,000 for bike and pedestrian crossings of the Washington-Palmetto Canal in this year's highway bill. Obviously, the locals have a problem setting priorities and would resent any attempt by the Bush administration to force them to rethink where Federal monies are best spent. They don't get a choice about where to spend that money; It has to be spent where the bill designates. It's also a far cry from the estimated $15 billion required for mitigation according to the Army Corps of Engineers proposals. |
#420
|
|||
|
|||
"James Robinson" wrote in message . 97.142... "sfb" wrote: Most, if not all the fault, with failing to upgrade Levees lies with the Louisiana Congressional Delegation. There a report in today's WSJ that they were able to get a $400,000 for the Mississippi River Trail and Bikepath and $3,200,000 for bike and pedestrian crossings of the Washington-Palmetto Canal in this year's highway bill. Obviously, the locals have a problem setting priorities and would resent any attempt by the Bush administration to force them to rethink where Federal monies are best spent. They don't get a choice about where to spend that money; It has to be spent where the bill designates. It's also a far cry from the estimated $15 billion required for mitigation according to the Army Corps of Engineers proposals. But it is the states congressional delegation that should take part in writing the bill. If they could only get $3.6 million they should have gotten it assigned to levee upgrades not bike paths. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fall Photo Shoots | Arnold Sten | Piloting | 7 | October 8th 04 04:29 PM |
Windsocks ,. Great fall special $ 15 for 1 or $ 25 for 2 | GASSITT | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 6th 04 05:12 AM |
Tomcats gone by fall of 2006 | Mike Weeks | Naval Aviation | 48 | June 22nd 04 02:32 PM |
NE fall foliage report | Cub Driver | Piloting | 0 | October 19th 03 12:25 PM |
Fall Colors Flights! | Jack Cunniff | Piloting | 2 | October 15th 03 10:06 PM |