Here come the user fees

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...authorization/

Washington Headquarters Press Release
For Immediate Release
Release No. AOC 05-07
February 14, 2007
Contact: Melanie Alvord or Laura Brown
Phone: (202) 267-3883

New FAA Reform Legislation to Transform Air Travel for Millions of Flyers
WASHINGTON - The Bush Administration sent legislation to Congress that will
reduce aviation congestion, improve passenger airline travel, and cut down
on noise for communities near major airports, Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Administrator Marion Blakey announced today.

The proposed legislation, called the Next Generation Air Transportation
System Financing Reform Act of 2007, would replace the decades-old system of
collecting ticket taxes with a cost-based, stable and reliable funding
program that relies on a combination of user-fees, taxes and a federal
government contribution to support the development of a new,
satellite-based, air traffic control system, called NextGen.

"This new proposal will make flying more convenient for millions of
travelers," said Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters. "Anyone who has
experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a delayed flight should
take a very close look at what we're proposing."

The new, more precise, air traffic control system will take full advantage
of the latest satellite-based technologies, allowing the FAA to handle more
aircraft, maintain high levels of safety, reduce flight delays, and cut
noise near airports, Administrator Blakey noted. The new system is essential
if the agency is to keep pace with growing demand for passenger and cargo
flights that will lead to between 2 and 3 times more air traffic by 2025,
she added.

The bill will eliminate the domestic passenger ticket tax and reduce the
international arrival and departure tax by 50 percent, reducing the overall
burden to both the airlines and the traveling public. It will generate
revenues based on the costs that users impose on the air traffic system,
whether they are commercial, business or general aviation users.

"Our proposal will make it easier for airports, airlines and controllers to
keep pace with the skyrocketing demand for air travel this nation is going
to experience over the coming decades," said Administrator Blakey. "With
over a billion passengers expected in the air by 2015, we have to act now or
risk gridlock in our skies and on our taxiways."

The legislation also provides limited new borrowing authority that can be
used by the FAA to support the construction of new runways, airport
terminals and air traffic control facilities and equipment. It also calls
for the establishment of a new advisory board that will give members of the
aviation community a stronger say in how federal funds are invested in
aviation, while maintaining strong congressional and public oversight in
recognition of the importance of aviation to the nation.

The legislative proposal makes several changes designed to improve the
ability of airports to meet capital needs and proposes to reform the
Passenger Facility Charge Program to enable large and medium sized airports
to raise local funds for vital construction projects. It also will
restructure the Airport Improvement Program by better targeting Federal
funds. And the bill funds research into new engine and airframe technology
that will reduce aircraft noise and engine emissions.

Administrator Blakey said she would work closely with the Congress to
encourage swift action on the legislative proposal, noting that the
expiration on September 30, 2007 of the funding authorization for the FAA's
current programs and the existing taxes that fund the Airport and Airway
Trust Fund provide a unique opportunity to create a system that better
serves travelers.

"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:SOZAh.4920$H77.483@trndny08...
http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...authorization/

The bill will eliminate the domestic passenger ticket tax and reduce the
international arrival and departure tax by 50 percent, reducing the
overall burden to both the airlines and the traveling public. It will
generate revenues based on the costs that users impose on the air traffic
system, whether they are commercial, business or general aviation users.

Ironic that it says nothing about reducing the fuel tax we now pay. I guess
GA gets to pay twice?

"Steve Foley" wrote

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...authorization/

Washington Headquarters Press Release
For Immediate Release

Some details:

"Jet and turboprop flights currently subject to the ticket tax—including
domestic, international, passenger, cargo, charter, air taxi, and fractional
operators—would pay their fair share of air traffic costs via user fees."

"GA and piston users will pay their fair share of FAA costs through a fuel
tax, their preferred mechanism. The tax rates are based on a detailed cost
allocation, and would change every two years in line with an updated cost
allocation study. All domestic commercial and GA users will also pay a
common fuel tax of 13.6 cents per gallon to fund AIP, the Essential Air
Service program and FAA’s Research, Engineering and Development account."

It seems to me that lots of GA users will be able to avoid this altogether
if they have an STC to use mogas.

BDS

"Dick Meade" wrote in message news:dYZAh.14906

Ironic that it says nothing about reducing the fuel tax we now pay. I
guess GA gets to pay twice?

Check the FAQ. Fuel tax is going to $0.70/gallon for GA

Steve Foley wrote:


"This new proposal will make flying more convenient for millions of
travelers," said Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters. "Anyone who has
experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a delayed flight should
take a very close look at what we're proposing."


That same sort of wording is used to describe the wonderful benefits
to all Americans for any new giant government expansion or spending program.

As an example lets try this same beuracratic BS in terms of, say, a new
National healthcare system:

"This new proposal will make health care more convenient for millions of
patients," said Secretary of Health and Human Resources John H. Maxtax.
"Anyone who has experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a
delayed admission to a hospital, or immediate response to their health
care needs to take a very close look at what we're proposing."

Here's the source for the $0.70/gal tax:

1.. The FAA divided the total pool of projected FY 2009 air traffic costs
allocated to general aviation and commercial piston users by the fiscal year
2009 tax yield to calculate a common fuel tax rate for this group of 56.4
cents per gallon. The AIP fuel tax of 13.6 cents per gallon was added to
this figure for the proposed total of 70.0 cents per gallon.

"BDS" wrote in message
news
"Steve Foley" wrote

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...authorization/

Washington Headquarters Press Release
For Immediate Release

Some details:

"Jet and turboprop flights currently subject to the ticket tax-including
domestic, international, passenger, cargo, charter, air taxi, and
fractional
operators-would pay their fair share of air traffic costs via user fees."

"GA and piston users will pay their fair share of FAA costs through a fuel
tax, their preferred mechanism. The tax rates are based on a detailed cost
allocation, and would change every two years in line with an updated cost
allocation study. All domestic commercial and GA users will also pay a
common fuel tax of 13.6 cents per gallon to fund AIP, the Essential Air
Service program and FAA's Research, Engineering and Development account."

It seems to me that lots of GA users will be able to avoid this altogether
if they have an STC to use mogas.

BDS

Of even greater interest is that this plan does NOT solve the problems
commercial aviation has. Allowing FAA to increase traffic density will
NOT solve the problem of weather delays propogating through the
system.


On Feb 15, 9:25 am, ktbr wrote:
Steve Foley wrote:

"This new proposal will make flying more convenient for millions of
travelers," said Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters. "Anyone who has
experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a delayed flight should
take a very close look at what we're proposing."

That same sort of wording is used to describe the wonderful benefits
to all Americans for any new giant government expansion or spending program.

As an example lets try this same beuracratic BS in terms of, say, a new
National healthcare system:

"This new proposal will make health care more convenient for millions of
patients," said Secretary of Health and Human Resources John H. Maxtax.
"Anyone who has experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a
delayed admission to a hospital, or immediate response to their health
care needs to take a very close look at what we're proposing."

"BDS" wrote in message news%ZAh.58927

It seems to me that lots of GA users will be able to avoid this altogether
if they have an STC to use mogas.

Unfortunately, all the mogas in Massachusetts has alcohol in it.

I had an STC for my Cherokee, but when I changed to 160HP (new pistons and
wrist pins) I invalidated it. I spoke to Petersen about it and was told I
needed a new fuel pump along with a new STC.

Does anyone know how to import fuel across state borders?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:07:46 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote in SOZAh.4920$H77.483@trndny08:

http://www.faa.gov/regulations_polic...authorization/

[...]
The proposed legislation, called the Next Generation Air Transportation
System Financing Reform Act of 2007, would replace the decades-old system of
collecting ticket taxes with a cost-based, stable and reliable funding
program that relies on a combination of user-fees, taxes and a federal
government contribution to support the development of a new,
satellite-based, air traffic control system, called NextGen.

With the removal of the airline ticket tax the traveling public gets a
free ride. Airlines burn several orders of magnitude more fuel than
GA. Airlines rely heavily on ATC facilities and personnel. But
airline travelers will not pay for their fair share of those.

The ticket tax needs to be adjusted upward to fund the NextGen scheme,
and a new airline jet fuel tax imposed. This would ensure the cost of
ATC is distributed equitably among those who benefit from it.

"This new proposal will make flying more convenient for millions of
travelers," said Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters. "Anyone who has
experienced the frustration and inconvenience of a delayed flight should
take a very close look at what we're proposing."

The lack of a definite claim above should set off your prevarication
detector.

The new, more precise, air traffic control system will take full advantage
of the latest satellite-based technologies,

An ATC system predicated on satellite communications is completely at
the mercy solar phenomena. I'd want to know how the NextGen system is
designed to deal with periodic solar activity based outages, before
I'd even consider implementing it.

Imagine the chaos as the entire ATC system, now managing 200% to 300%
more air traffic, loses GPS, data and voice communications. Because
NextGen has rendered them obsolete, VORs, ILSs and ADFs won't be
available to pilots at such a time of solar based system failure.

allowing the FAA to handle more
aircraft, maintain high levels of safety, reduce flight delays, and cut
noise near airports, Administrator Blakey noted. The new system is essential
if the agency is to keep pace with growing demand for passenger and cargo
flights that will lead to between 2 and 3 times more air traffic by 2025,
she added.

The bill will eliminate the domestic passenger ticket tax

It's the damn airline passengers that necessitate the ATC system in
the first place. What possible motivation could there be to eliminate
airline passengers from paying their fair share of ATC facility and
personnel costs?

and reduce the
international arrival and departure tax by 50 percent, reducing the overall
burden to both the airlines and the traveling public.

Their burden should be increased so that it is commensurate with their
use, not reduced nor eliminated!

It will generate
revenues based on the costs that users impose on the air traffic system,
whether they are commercial, business or general aviation users.

Yes. On a per-aircraft bases, not a per user bases. That's not
equitable.

"Our proposal will make it easier for airports, airlines and controllers to
keep pace with the skyrocketing demand for air travel this nation is going
to experience over the coming decades," said Administrator Blakey. "With
over a billion passengers expected in the air by 2015, we have to act now or
risk gridlock in our skies and on our taxiways."

Personally, I see no way for NextGen to meet that promise. It's going
to take a lot of concrete to change the current situation. And given
the public's current contempt for airport expansion, any change is
going to take decades to implement.

The legislation also provides limited new borrowing authority that can be
used by the FAA to support the construction of new runways, airport
terminals and air traffic control facilities and equipment.

Boeing is only too happy to earn the interest on the funds it loans
FAA to purchase its new systems, and circumvent congressional
oversight of FAA expenditures in the bargain.

It also calls for the establishment of a new advisory board that will
give members of the aviation community a stronger say in how federal
funds are invested in aviation, while maintaining strong congressional
and public oversight in recognition of the importance of aviation to
the nation.

Who wrote this piece, Karl Rove!

The above should read:

The establishment of a new advisory board will give large
corporations, the manufacturers and operators of the airline
industry, a stronger say in how our federal funds are invested in
supporting their pet programs at the expense of losing
congressional and public oversight.


The legislative proposal makes several changes designed to improve the
ability of airports to meet capital needs and proposes to reform the
Passenger Facility Charge Program to enable large and medium sized airports
to raise local funds for vital construction projects. It also will
restructure the Airport Improvement Program by better targeting Federal
funds. And the bill funds research into new engine and airframe technology
that will reduce aircraft noise and engine emissions.

Boy, Boeing and the airlines just can't wait to get their hands on all
that AIP money.

Administrator Blakey said she would work closely with the Congress to
encourage swift action on the legislative proposal, noting that the
expiration on September 30, 2007 of the funding authorization for the FAA's
current programs and the existing taxes that fund the Airport and Airway
Trust Fund provide a unique opportunity to create a system that better
serves travelers.


That's it, rush it through so that the news media don't have time to
expose the sham for what it is.

"Tony" wrote:

Of even greater interest is that this plan does NOT solve the problems
commercial aviation has. Allowing FAA to increase traffic density will
NOT solve the problem of weather delays propogating through the
system.

Nor will it solve the gridlock that is part of the hub and spoke
system and inadequate runway/terminal capacity.

Plus their track record on developing systems is poor. They also
wanted to totally reduce ground-based navaids prior to 9/11.

And if you think that radars are going way, guess again.

Ron Lee