A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OH-58D



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 13th 05, 04:14 AM
Jim Burt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default OH-58D

The thread called "Is MDHI going to make it?" drifted into a comparison of
the MD 500 and OH-58D aircraft. What follows is a discussion of the latter:

All the US Army OH-58Ds were rebuilt (OK, very, very extensively rebuilt and
modified) OH-58As. The rebuild process took the aircraft down to the
frames, replaced most of the sheet metal and a lot of the composites, built
new cowlings, fuel storage, rear compartments, tail booms, and all new
dynamic components, as well as completely replacing all the instrumentation,
avionics, and powerplants. But they started out as OH-58As. The only "new"
from the skids up OH-58D helicopters were built under contract to Taiwan.

Jim


  #2  
Old May 13th 05, 11:36 AM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Burt is correct.

The last "remanufactured" OH-58Ds left Bell about 7 years ago. Most of
the remanufactured Kiowas left Bell about 15 to 20 years ago. Unlike
Bell H-1s and Cobras which can be with remanufactured over and over
(and over), light helicopters like the OH-58 are not as robust. If
they were, they would be as heavy as a H-1.

Take care,

CTR

  #3  
Old May 16th 05, 03:33 PM
Chuck Kemp @ send no stinking spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Okay Boeing is on record of now having the design rites to the OH6, with
that said, very little is known what they plan to produce for the project
other than a modified version of the MELB. This could be a major design
change to accommodate all of the extra's and oh yea, it has to carry some
troops in the back too. Are they going to carry them outside like they do
now with the MELB?

Also, the rollover design that everyone crows about in the event of a crash,
was predicated on the design of the OH6, which didn't have outboard weapons
pylons and the such. Doesn't the ARH have to have the capability to shoot
stingers, hellfires and rockets? I don't think the MELB currently does this
either but the OH58D does. No doubt the MELB can be made to do so, but its
another area for redesign...

Food for thought:

1. No one in the market has a product support department that compares to
Bell. It seems that Boeing will have to build up a MELB support department
as I am sure they don't have many to handle such a large quantity sell. I
would think they don't have that many in support for SOF MELB's.

2. With the Bell's ARH being modified from an existing commercial aircraft
(407X) and since these aircraft are to be kept similar, it would seem that
the supportability for these aircraft would be more extensive as
logistically the Army could purchase many parts from a local CSF nearest to
them.

Chuck


"Jim Burt" wrote in message
...
The thread called "Is MDHI going to make it?" drifted into a comparison of
the MD 500 and OH-58D aircraft. What follows is a discussion of the

latter:

All the US Army OH-58Ds were rebuilt (OK, very, very extensively rebuilt

and
modified) OH-58As. The rebuild process took the aircraft down to the
frames, replaced most of the sheet metal and a lot of the composites,

built
new cowlings, fuel storage, rear compartments, tail booms, and all new
dynamic components, as well as completely replacing all the

instrumentation,
avionics, and powerplants. But they started out as OH-58As. The only

"new"
from the skids up OH-58D helicopters were built under contract to Taiwan.

Jim




  #4  
Old May 16th 05, 09:21 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuck Kemp @ send no stinking spam wrote:
[stuff snipped]

Also, the rollover design that everyone crows about in the event of a

crash,
was predicated on the design of the OH6, which didn't have outboard

weapons
pylons and the such. Doesn't the ARH have to have the capability to

shoot
stingers, hellfires and rockets? I don't think the MELB currently

does this
either but the OH58D does. No doubt the MELB can be made to do so,

but its
another area for redesign...


The current AH-6J and M have the capability of shooting Hellfires and
standard 2.75 inch rockets. They tested Stingers on them but AFAIK
they've never been used operationally. The Little Bird fleet was
standardized with wiring for Hellfires several years ago. There's an
onboard lasing system for designation or they can be designated by
somebody else.

Food for thought:


[more stuff snipped]

2. With the Bell's ARH being modified from an existing commercial

aircraft
(407X) and since these aircraft are to be kept similar, it would seem

that
the supportability for these aircraft would be more extensive as
logistically the Army could purchase many parts from a local CSF

nearest to
them.


Except the Army doesn't usually get its spare parts that way.

John Hairell )

  #5  
Old May 17th 05, 05:43 PM
Chuck Kemp @ send no stinking spam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuck wrote:
2. With the Bell's ARH being modified from an existing commercial
aircraft (407X) and since these aircraft are to be kept similar, it would

seem
that the supportability for these aircraft would be more extensive as
logistically the Army could purchase many parts from a local CSF
nearest to them.


John Hairell ) replied:
Except the Army doesn't usually get its spare parts that way


Chuck says:
Times are a changing, they are on record of saying just that....

wrote in message
ups.com...
Chuck Kemp @ send no stinking spam wrote:
[stuff snipped]

Also, the rollover design that everyone crows about in the event of a

crash,
was predicated on the design of the OH6, which didn't have outboard

weapons
pylons and the such. Doesn't the ARH have to have the capability to

shoot
stingers, hellfires and rockets? I don't think the MELB currently

does this
either but the OH58D does. No doubt the MELB can be made to do so,

but its
another area for redesign...


The current AH-6J and M have the capability of shooting Hellfires and
standard 2.75 inch rockets. They tested Stingers on them but AFAIK
they've never been used operationally. The Little Bird fleet was
standardized with wiring for Hellfires several years ago. There's an
onboard lasing system for designation or they can be designated by
somebody else.

Food for thought:


[more stuff snipped]

2. With the Bell's ARH being modified from an existing commercial

aircraft
(407X) and since these aircraft are to be kept similar, it would seem

that
the supportability for these aircraft would be more extensive as
logistically the Army could purchase many parts from a local CSF

nearest to
them.


Except the Army doesn't usually get its spare parts that way.

John Hairell )



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.