New Cessna Forum

There's a new membership-based discussion forum that's been active for about
a month now. It's at http://www.cessna-pilots.com

Membershp is free, although most of the users expect some type of fee in a
year or so. There are close to 500 members registered at this point.

You don't have to own a Cessna, but you'll probably get better mileage from
reading the posts if you do.

There are separate discussion forums for each type of Cessna (172, 182,
300-series, etc.), general maintenance, piloting, etc.

I have no principal stake in this website - I am just a plain 'ol member who
enjoys increasing my type-specific knowledge.

Carl

There's a new membership-based discussion forum

I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except
maybe OT postings, which I can skip).

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

Jose wrote:
There's a new membership-based discussion forum

I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except
maybe OT postings, which I can skip).

Jose


Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private'
discussion groups, for all kinds of products and applications, some
where you even have to pay. I can understand this where membership is
controlled due to sensitive or private information, but for the vast
majority of these groups anyone can join just by sending an email to
majordomo. May be they are afraid of a wider audience, or stage fright.
May be this is also why some specify 'no-archive' on their usenet
postings.

Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private'
discussion groups...

Yanno... if Usenet didn't exist, and somebody just invented it, it would
be considered a great advance, like podcasting.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

In article . com,
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote:

Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private'
discussion groups, for all kinds of products and applications, some
where you even have to pay. I can understand this where membership is
controlled due to sensitive or private information, but for the vast
majority of these groups anyone can join just by sending an email to
majordomo. May be they are afraid of a wider audience, or stage fright.
May be this is also why some specify 'no-archive' on their usenet
postings.

If it is moderated, you won't get the off-topic thread drift and flames.
This would seem to make it a more "civilized" forum.

Jose wrote:

There's a new membership-based discussion forum


I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except
maybe OT postings, which I can skip).

Then you're the only one. The Cessna Pilots Assoc maintains a web board
that easily gets 10 times the posts that this group gets. If there's
something you want to know about your Cessna that's the place to go.

further on that, having been a member of the cessna pilots assn. for a
few months, since i bought my 172-c, i've found there are real serious
benifits to paying the very cheap dues. they have a staff of tech
experts, a huge database and archive, well produced monthly glossy
magazine and on and on.
seems there have been personal conflicts and affronts (about which
i know nothing and really care less) as a result of which there was
formed the other group comprised of wonderfully nice, extremely
experienced experts to be sure. no resources but excellent people as
best i can tell.

just my opinion but it seems that if the second group is wildly
successful then the first group will not be able to afford to keep up
the tech resources which would be a huge loss for cessna owners
worldwide. i don't really see that happening as we have a less than 500
person free sign-up group on one hand and a fee paid membership of
many, many thousands on the other.

it was people on this group who suggested i check out the c.p.a. when i
bought and that was excellent advice. i would strongly advise any
cessna owner to pay and participate in the cessna pilots assn. it costs
me about an hour of avgas. as long as it's free i also enjoy checking
the threads at the other group sometimes.

dan
Newps wrote:
Jose wrote:

There's a new membership-based discussion forum


I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except
maybe OT postings, which I can skip).

Then you're the only one. The Cessna Pilots Assoc maintains a web board
that easily gets 10 times the posts that this group gets. If there's
something you want to know about your Cessna that's the place to go.

Can anybody please tell me where this thread started. I'd like to read the
whole thing.

Jim

In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote:

Can anybody please tell me where this thread started. I'd like to read the
whole thing.

Jim



Here is the original message:


From: "Carl Orton"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning,rec.aviation.piloting
Subject: New Cessna Forum
Lines: 18
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
Message-ID:
X-Trace:
lalincmlnekeejjfijjdnojopddcmjimjdmdfonoejjhahlgph obfeiclhpmnimlohblfpejf
ojlpdpgepoiecooaegdhajkdmmanelijghoamnlbfclfikkomg ckcejenfnojecgjgcfcij
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:08:30 MST
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:08:37 -0500
rec.aviation.piloting:483890

There's a new membership-based discussion forum that's been active for
about
a month now. It's at http://www.cessna-pilots.com

Membershp is free, although most of the users expect some type of fee in
a
year or so. There are close to 500 members registered at this point.

You don't have to own a Cessna, but you'll probably get better mileage
from
reading the posts if you do.

There are separate discussion forums for each type of Cessna (172, 182,
300-series, etc.), general maintenance, piloting, etc.

I have no principal stake in this website - I am just a plain 'ol member
who
enjoys increasing my type-specific knowledge.

Carl

Interesting. Wonder why my newsreader can't find it at all. Oh well.
Thanks.

Jim



"real_name" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote:

Can anybody please tell me where this thread started. I'd like to read
the
whole thing.

Jim



Here is the original message: