A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Max gross weight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 29th 04, 04:48 AM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Max gross weight

How do aircraft manufactures determine the maximum gross weight for a
given plane? I know I've come across articles that mention on a cool day
you can go over the max. gross weight by a percentage, I think 20% was
thrown out there but not sure. Then again, on a hot day you might not
get any where near that. Is it determined by a standard temp?
  #2  
Old September 29th 04, 05:06 AM
Ben Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Chris wrote:
How do aircraft manufactures determine the maximum gross weight for a
given plane?


The prototype is fitted with a water bladder and is flown in formation
with a tanker. The bladder is slowly filled with water until the plane
drops out of the sky. A gauge in the tanker indicates the max gross
weight of the new design.

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/
  #3  
Old September 29th 04, 05:33 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ROFLMFAO

very funny indeed
BT

"Ben Jackson" wrote in message
news:8xq6d.171917$3l3.101172@attbi_s03...
In article ,
Chris wrote:
How do aircraft manufactures determine the maximum gross weight for a
given plane?


The prototype is fitted with a water bladder and is flown in formation
with a tanker. The bladder is slowly filled with water until the plane
drops out of the sky. A gauge in the tanker indicates the max gross
weight of the new design.

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/



  #4  
Old September 29th 04, 06:25 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ben Jackson"
The prototype is fitted with a water bladder and is flown in formation
with a tanker. The bladder is slowly filled with water until the plane
drops out of the sky. A gauge in the tanker indicates the max gross
weight of the new design.



How would you like to be the lucky pilot during "water test" ...#2?

http://www.theknownuniverse.com/comet.htm
(bottom half of the piece)

The Ministry of Civil Aviation decided upon a unique test to find out. They
built a tank large enough to hold one of the grounded Comets. The wings
protruded from water-tight slots in the sides of the tank. Then the tank and
cabin were flooded with water. The water pressure inside the cabin would be
raised to eight and a quarter pounds per square inch to simulate the
pressure encountered by a Comet at 35,000 feet. It would be held there for
three minutes and then lowered while the wings were moved up and down by
hydraulic jacks. The hydraulic jacks would simulate the flexing that
naturally occurs in aircraft wings during flight. This process continued
non-stop, 24 hours a day.


Montblack


  #5  
Old September 29th 04, 05:35 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris" wrote in message
...
I know I've come across articles that mention on a cool day
you can go over the max. gross weight by a percentage, I think 20% was
thrown out there but not sure.


You should NEVER go over max GW.. that is a limit, not a buffer zone.

The aircraft may be able to support the extra weight on a smooth day.. but
not in turbulence, and when the accident investigation computes your actual
GW and finds a "causal factor in the accident is exceeding the Max GW
allowed".. your insurance company may find your policy invalid.

BT


  #6  
Old September 29th 04, 05:40 AM
Dan Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"your insurance company may find your policy invalid"

bull

"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:uYq6d.114$mS1.39@fed1read05...

"Chris" wrote in message
...
I know I've come across articles that mention on a cool day
you can go over the max. gross weight by a percentage, I think 20% was
thrown out there but not sure.


You should NEVER go over max GW.. that is a limit, not a buffer zone.

The aircraft may be able to support the extra weight on a smooth day.. but
not in turbulence, and when the accident investigation computes your
actual
GW and finds a "causal factor in the accident is exceeding the Max GW
allowed".. your insurance company may find your policy invalid.

BT




  #7  
Old September 29th 04, 05:42 AM
Jim Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Isn't there a 15% tolerance allowed for certain types of flights in Alaska?

--
Jim Carter
"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:uYq6d.114$mS1.39@fed1read05...

"Chris" wrote in message
...
I know I've come across articles that mention on a cool day
you can go over the max. gross weight by a percentage, I think 20% was
thrown out there but not sure.


You should NEVER go over max GW.. that is a limit, not a buffer zone.

The aircraft may be able to support the extra weight on a smooth day.. but
not in turbulence, and when the accident investigation computes your

actual
GW and finds a "causal factor in the accident is exceeding the Max GW
allowed".. your insurance company may find your policy invalid.

BT




  #8  
Old September 29th 04, 04:12 PM
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Jim Carter" wrote:

Isn't there a 15% tolerance allowed for certain types of flights in Alaska?


Part 135 only.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html
  #9  
Old September 29th 04, 06:00 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale" wrote in message ...
In article ,
"Jim Carter" wrote:

Isn't there a 15% tolerance allowed for certain types of flights in Alaska?


Part 135 only.

And even then it's not just an "automatic" increase.

  #10  
Old September 30th 04, 04:08 AM
Jim Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, its been many years since I flew out of Boeing Field and up the
coast, so I wasn't sure that kind of thing was still allowed up there.

--
Jim Carter
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

"Dale" wrote in message

...
In article ,
"Jim Carter" wrote:

Isn't there a 15% tolerance allowed for certain types of flights in

Alaska?


Part 135 only.

And even then it's not just an "automatic" increase.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache Alternate Gross Weight Jim Burns Owning 1 July 6th 04 05:15 PM
Dutch Roll SelwayKid Piloting 31 June 19th 04 11:43 PM
homebuilt safety anonymous coward Home Built 96 June 3rd 04 04:34 AM
Buying an L-2 Robert M. Gary Piloting 13 May 25th 04 04:03 AM
F35 cost goes up. Pat Carpenter Military Aviation 116 April 11th 04 07:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.