A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

contrails



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 24th 10, 12:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Global Warming/Climate Change (was contrails)


Being a bit touchy aren't we Tom? If you want to present AGW/Climate
Change as a religion (which it seems to have become), then I am
neither a believer or a disbeliever (denialist), but an agnostic. The
latest data on World temperatures, which show a slight cooling, do not
correlate with the theory, so that is why.


Not according to people who actually track that sort of thing:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?report=global#gtemp

Possibly you were thinking of data sets that begin with the El Nino
event of 1998-99?

If you use that as your starting point then it biases the result to
show
fairly flat temperatures from 1998 - 2008, just like you could use it
to exaggerate increasing temperatures from 1989 1999.

I think some people call that 'cherry picking' the data.

For myself, I don't put much stock in the currently available database
of direct temperature measurements, and less stock in proxies. In
both cases the sampling problem looms large.

I do trust the measurements of atmospheric gases from Mauna Loa
and the measurements of solar activity. Those are much easier to
sample.

If one does accept direct temperature measurement and pre-Mauna
Loa atmospheric gas measurements and proxies like these:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:In...ure_Record.png

What we see is a temperature rise of ~ 0.7 degrees Celsius during the
20th century.

One can explain that as follows:

Temperatures rose quickly at the end of the 19th century due
to methane released by oil exploitation (early on there was no
market for natural gas so gas wells were typically left uncapped).
As methane has a fairly low half life in the atmosphere (12 years)
temperatures dropped quickly until 1910 or so at which point
carbon emissions from industrial growth caused a continuous
rise through WWII.

Then very rapid industrial growth and coal burning in particular,
especially to power the world's electrical grids loaded the
atmosphere with aerosols that offset the increased greenhouse
effect of the concurrently released carbon dioxide until pollution
abatement came into vogue in the 1970s. This pollution abatement
concentrated on particulates and sulfur compounds, but ignored
carbon dioxide.

As particulates continued to drop out of the atmosphere and
carbon-dioxide rose so did temperatures from then until now,
with a noted acceleration after German reunification produced
a cleanup of East German Industry.

Other explanations are possible.

--

FF
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
contrails No Name Aviation Photos 3 June 22nd 07 01:47 PM
Contrails Darkwing Piloting 21 March 23rd 07 05:58 PM
Contrails Kevin Dunlevy Piloting 4 December 13th 06 08:31 PM
Contrails Steven P. McNicoll Piloting 17 December 10th 03 10:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.