A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Washington DC ADIZ Proposal



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 05, 12:07 PM
Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Washington DC ADIZ Proposal

Please send comments TODAY (Nov. 2)!!!

Scott

Original message from EAA:



Dear EAA Chapter Member,

This update is being brought to you as a member service:

__________________________________________________ ____

EAA 'Unequivocally and Fervently' Opposes Permanent D.C.-area ADIZ

Nov. 1 - EAA has left no doubts where it stands on a proposed permanent
Washington, D.C., area
Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), as the organization stated in
its official comments to the Federal
Aviation Administration. The FAA proposal, which has also drawn
opposition from nearly every other
national aviation organization, would convert the existing Temporary
Flight Restricted Area into a
permanent Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA), severely restricting general
aviation activities in a
wide region within 50 miles of the nation's capital.

"EAA's comments, consistent with more than 16,000 others made to the FAA
thus far, strenuously
assert that converting the current ADIZ into a permanently restricted
area is a very bad idea and an
even worse precedent," said Tom Poberezny, EAA president. "Security
around our nation's capital
is a necessity, but this proposal does nothing to enhance security while
it eviscerates the general
aviation infrastructure in that area."

The temporary ADIZ has caused substantial harm to the region's local
airports and businesses, as
well as general aviation pilots in the region. EAA's 39 pages of
comments outline these hardships
with both broad rationale and specific individual examples. In addition
to drawing opposition from
national aviation organizations, FAA's proposal is publicly opposed by
members of Congress,
affected communities, and thousands of individual EAA members and other
pilots.

EAA has several specific objections to this proposal, as outlined in its
comments to FAA
Docket #FAA-2004-17005-15898:
* It is the first airspace proposal whose sole focus is to deprive
Americans of their right
to have access to the National Airspace System. It specifically
targets recreational and
general aviation pilots. The proposal was drawn as a response to the
9/11/01 commercial
airliner attacks on American citizens, but deviated from that original
purpose.
* It is the latest in a disturbing trend where specific agencies and
even private corporations
have superceded FAA's authority and mandate to manage airspace, without
operational need
or safety-of-flight issues, and despite overwhelming public comments
opposed to the proposals.
* There is no practical administrative method for handling the current
ADIZ procedures and
none outlined in the SFRA proposal, which further burdens
already-stretched controllers in the region.
* A multitude of flight safety and economic threats in the affected
region remain under the
proposal and, in a number of cases, are worse.

EAA has also filed Freedom of Information Act requests to a half-dozen
federal agencies, requesting
all information pertaining to the research into this proposal and its
creation.

"Along with our complete opposition to this proposal, EAA has forwarded
practical, common-sense
recommendations that would maintain the vital security of the National
Capitol Region and allow
adjustments, when necessary, based on known national security threats,"
Poberezny said. "Instead
of harming the aviation infrastructure and institutionalizing
anti-aviation phobia with this plan, FAA
should review and understand the thousands of comments, then adopt an
alternative method to
achieve security goals."

The official comment period ends Wednesday, Nov. 2. Comments can still
be made through that
date by any of the following methods:

1. Go to the Docket "comment submit" web page
(http://dms.dot.gov/submit/dspSubmission.cfm), type in
"FAA-2004-17005" in the Docket ID block
and "Washington DC ADIZ" in the Document Title block, fill out the rest
of the form, then click
"continue." The next page is where comments are actually submitted to
the DOT Docket.

2. Fax comments to the DOT Docket at 202-493-2251;

3. Mail them to the Docket (postmark of November 2, 2005 will be accepted):
Docket Management Facility
Department of Transportation
Nassif Building, Room PL-401
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590-0001

For additional information, please go to the story on the web at:
http://www.eaa.org/communications/ea...1_dc_adiz.html
  #2  
Old November 4th 05, 04:18 PM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Washington DC ADIZ Proposal

Comment period extended 90 days.

http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...103mineta.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Washington ADIZ comments Jay Masino Piloting 4 November 3rd 05 05:27 AM
EAA position on ADIZ... .Blueskies. Piloting 0 November 2nd 05 12:16 AM
EAA position on ADIZ... .Blueskies. Home Built 0 November 2nd 05 12:15 AM
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 15th 03 10:01 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.