A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My airplane - NO MY airplane....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 05, 07:00 PM
Casey Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default My airplane - NO MY airplane....

From today's edition of an electronic Aviation Newsletter (AvFlash):

Pilots Battle Computer For Control Of 777

Stanley Kubrick couldn't have scripted anything more eerie than the
real-life odyssey of a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 that seemed hell-bent
on crashing itself on a trip from Perth to Kuala Lumpur last Aug. 1.
According to The Australian newspaper, the Malaysian flight crew had to
literally battle for control of the aircraft after something went wonky with
the computerized controls. The plane was about an hour into the flight when
it suddenly climbed 3,000 feet and almost stalled. The Australian Transport
Safety Bureau
http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/occurs/occurs_detail.cfm?ID=767 report
said the pilot was able to disconnect the autopilot and lower the nose to
prevent the stall but the autothrottles refused to disengage and when the
nose pitched down they increased power. Even pushing the throttles to idle
didn't deter the silicon brains and the plane pitched up again and climbed
2,000 feet the second time. The pilot was able to fly manually back to Perth
but the autothrottles wouldn't turn off. As he was landing, the primary
flight display gave a false low airspeed warning and the throttles
firewalled again. The display also warned of a non-existent wind shear.
Boeing spokesman Ken Morton said it was the only such problem ever
experienced on the 777 but airlines have been told via an emergency AD
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgad.nsf/0/25F9233FE09B613F8625706C005D0C53?OpenDocument
to load an earlier software version just in case. The investigation is
focusing on the air data inertial data reference unit (HAL for short?),
which apparently supplied false acceleration figures to the primary flight
computer.



Greg Dungan
Fixed Wing Academics
US Naval Test Pilot School
301.757.4145 (office)
301.994.0083 (residence)
240.925.0980 (cell)


  #2  
Old September 20th 05, 07:36 PM
Jay Beckman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message
news:J6YXe.1909$Az1.1071@trnddc07...
From today's edition of an electronic Aviation Newsletter (AvFlash):

Pilots Battle Computer For Control Of 777


Pilot: Lower the landing gear HAL...

HAL: I'm sorry Captain, I'm afraid I can't do that...

Jay B


  #3  
Old September 21st 05, 07:32 PM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("Jay Beckman" wrote)
Pilots Battle Computer For Control Of 777


Pilot: Lower the landing gear HAL...

HAL: I'm sorry Captain, I'm afraid I can't do that...



HAL: Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do...

Interesting side note: HAL is one letter off from IBM.
Mid 60's coincidence? I think not. :-)


Montblack
  #4  
Old September 22nd 05, 01:41 AM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It is (was) not...

It was a definate play on "IBM"



Dave


On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:32:26 -0500, "Montblack"
wrote:

("Jay Beckman" wrote)
Pilots Battle Computer For Control Of 777


Pilot: Lower the landing gear HAL...

HAL: I'm sorry Captain, I'm afraid I can't do that...



HAL: Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do...

Interesting side note: HAL is one letter off from IBM.
Mid 60's coincidence? I think not. :-)


Montblack


  #5  
Old September 25th 05, 10:33 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote:

It is (was) not...

It was a definate play on "IBM"


Sorry but Arthur Clarke(the author of a Space Odissey)told in an interview
that the name HAL was not meant to be related to IBM. Actually it was the
acronym for:

H(euristic) AL(gorithm)
  #6  
Old September 30th 05, 06:41 PM
pgbnh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"but the autothrottles wouldn't turn off"

Gee, why not just pull the mixture back???

(Yeah, I know, I know)



"Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com wrote in message
news:J6YXe.1909$Az1.1071@trnddc07...
From today's edition of an electronic Aviation Newsletter (AvFlash):

Pilots Battle Computer For Control Of 777

Stanley Kubrick couldn't have scripted anything more eerie than the
real-life odyssey of a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 that seemed hell-bent
on crashing itself on a trip from Perth to Kuala Lumpur last Aug. 1.
According to The Australian newspaper, the Malaysian flight crew had to
literally battle for control of the aircraft after something went wonky
with the computerized controls. The plane was about an hour into the
flight when it suddenly climbed 3,000 feet and almost stalled. The
Australian Transport Safety Bureau
http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/occurs/occurs_detail.cfm?ID=767 report
said the pilot was able to disconnect the autopilot and lower the nose to
prevent the stall but the autothrottles refused to disengage and when the
nose pitched down they increased power. Even pushing the throttles to idle
didn't deter the silicon brains and the plane pitched up again and climbed
2,000 feet the second time. The pilot was able to fly manually back to
Perth but the autothrottles wouldn't turn off. As he was landing, the
primary flight display gave a false low airspeed warning and the throttles
firewalled again. The display also warned of a non-existent wind shear.
Boeing spokesman Ken Morton said it was the only such problem ever
experienced on the 777 but airlines have been told via an emergency AD
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgad.nsf/0/25F9233FE09B613F8625706C005D0C53?OpenDocument
to load an earlier software version just in case. The investigation is
focusing on the air data inertial data reference unit (HAL for short?),
which apparently supplied false acceleration figures to the primary flight
computer.



Greg Dungan
Fixed Wing Academics
US Naval Test Pilot School
301.757.4145 (office)
301.994.0083 (residence)
240.925.0980 (cell)




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crash In The Nolichucky W P Dixon Piloting 2 June 22nd 05 04:16 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins Ramapriya Piloting 72 November 23rd 04 04:05 AM
The Best Airplane Veeduber Home Built 1 February 13th 04 05:43 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 2 February 2nd 04 11:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.