If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:50:07 GMT, "Michael Pilla"
wrote: Twenty years ago, we couldn't bring calculators with memories into the work areas (I once had a security officer pick up a calculator I was using and ask, "Is that a classified number?"). Today, most engineering and management types are wedded to their PDAs, and the security guys either have to allow them in or cripple the true work. Security level must have been low if PDAs were allowed in/out without checking/vetting several steps along the way. There are generally three phases of security: 1. "Never heard of them" 2. "Oh my God, no! Keep them out of here!" 3. "Well, all right, but....." I've seen this process happen on several types of new technology. Soon after they reluctantly agreed that you could bring in calculators with memory, someone showed up with a TI-59 with the magnetic-card read/write capability. As far as the PDAs were concerned, initially they were looked on as nothing more than the electronic equivalents of paper notepads or upgraded versions of multifunction calculators. Then some bright spark realized that many of them had wireless transmission capability (e.g., "beaming") and the knee-jerk happened. Eventually, they're to the point where they approve them on an individual model-by-model basis depending upon the capability of the unit, and upon a manager's signoff that the unit is vital to work performance. So when you see PDAs, they have big ugly "Security Approved" stickers on them. I've always been fascinated with the differences in security levels between government agencies, and between those agencies and the contractors that do the work for them. In the past, I've had to undergo routine exit searches on mildly sensitive programs, and while on another program we were sealed in a metal TEMPEST enclosure to do our work, while our customer had ordinary offices with windows that opened. I still am appalled at how easy it was for Wen Ho Lee.... Ron Wanttaja |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 23:50:54 -0500, Big John
wrote: When stationed in Canal Zone, I and a couple of my friends bought a brass mine high in the Andes in Peru. I ended up the managing partner. If you have a serious interest in a long term investment let me know. Big John My mettalurgy might be a bit rusty but I thought Brass was a combination of copper and tin.... Boy that mine must really be valuable then....;-] Q |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
So much for my unmoderated newsgroup argument. This one's just to get
"Festus" the troll off the board. Time to let this thread die I think. pac |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
ust my observation from lurking here since 95'
Likewise. I remember Bill Phillips first posts with the OMABP, and some other sterling and entertaining posts. But that was then, this is now. Pac plyer, sorry to be the one to tell you this, but you're either hopelessly naive or uninformed about some matters (and I don't mean minutia of who sad what when on USENET). I don't mean to insult you, but it's like you're the USENET equivalent of a case study from that 'ol pop-psy book "Women who love too much: when you keep wishing and hoping he'll change". A friend's neighbor has a pot-bellied pig. 5 years ago it was funny and entertaining and more-or-less fit to come in the living room. Now it's a big stanky porker which smushes the veggies and tears up the flower beds every time it gets loose, and it's just not going to be able to revert to anything else no matter how much they wish it would. Yeah, Sydney, it's pigs like you that dog people around and make posting here a chore. You've never said anything I've seen here that contributed to the field of aviation. All you have ever done is bitch about what I've posted, or the quality of some CFI that gave your husband a BFR. This post of yours here is typical. Nothing to do with flying, just taking shots at someone else and trying to couch it in civil drivel. All I've ever seen here that's come from your computer are complaints, not solutions, to GA problems. I consider you a whiner with a negative attitude and a know nothing. What post have you EVER made that had anything positive to say about aviation? I missed it. I think you are the utlimate gossip and you are always negative. In the early days of posting here I had thick skin to low-time know-it-all pilots like you. My thick skin has been eaten away by all the dweebs (like you) who have never flown much but who all have big opinions about everything they know nothing about. You lead the pack in my opinion. Have a nice day moron. BWB Cheers, Sydney |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.scottandmichelle.net/scott/dtv.html You could be in Pheonix or Tuscon, but the beam you're in covers Las Vegas. It doesn't cover most of California. Google says no one named either mturner or pac plyer ever posted in alt.dis or alt.dis.information. Only Bill would ever suggest that Sydney should appologize to Bill. BBWWAHAHHAHHAAAAAA That is funny. Hey Pac. Are you at Sandy? If so, give old Paul Muskat a big sloppy wet kiss on the lips from Badwater Bill and tell him to kiss my entire ass. Bridget is too good for that old coot! In fact, come to think of it, you might be Paul. Be careful about telling these assholes anything of any substance. The comment about your hangar is not real good. Many of these *******s will make you their hobby and report you for something like that just for fun. This crowd is such a fun loving group, when I owned an RV-6 that I parked outside, they slashed my tires for a couple posts I made. They are a lovely group of cock suckers, Pac. Watch your six. BWB If this weenie responds, would somebody copy his full post in their response please so I can see it. I'd like to know what the rest of this worm's comments are. Somebody tell me his name! Thanks BWB, whoops, pacplyer |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, why does Sydney get all the venom? Just because she knows what she's talking about and doesn't like bad tempered rat-*******s with nothing useful to contribute, she gets the full brunt of your girls-have-cooties attitude. Because I think she's a ****. I'd be jealous if you weren't such a slimeball, Bill. You've managed to sour every place you appear and drive off all your friends. You are still jealous...and my friends are right here moron. And, I haven't even started souring things like I might if I get ****ed. People who've earned the respect and friendship of those who know them don't like you. Why doesn't that make you go away? I have so many friends, I need to dispose of some of them. I even have Auxiliary friends. As far as I'm concerned, I could give a **** less who responds to my posts. In fact, why do you find it so necessary to comment, you annoymous cowardly little faggot prick? Do a Google search on everything Sydney has posted over the years then try to distill off any contribution she's ever made to this group concerning flying or building. If you can find anything that is not some regurgitation of something someone else has posted, I'll eat my hat. All I've ever seen her do it set herself up as some kind of expert commentary-generating bitch who takes shots at the real people here who do go out and do it everyday. I doubt that she's even an average pilot from the bull **** she's posted here over the years. She argues with people who have been flight instructors for 30 years, or flying the big iron for the same amount of time as if she were a professional pilot herself. That's the problem with an open forum like this, even an idiot has the same priority to post on a subject they know nothing about. But a professional pilot or mechanic comes in here giving the group real data and real information and they get trounced by the weekend pilots like Sydney. The professionals see the bull ****, give up, and leave. It hurts the entire group. It's obvious who walks the walk in here. There's a pecking order, and I think that many, like her, are too dumb to know the difference between a solo student and an ATP when they post. It's them who are the noise and pollution of RAH, not me. It's them and the cowards like you who are annonymous chicken****s who have the big opinions that can't hold water but hide behind your computer screen in horror should you be found out. BWB Speaking of know-it-alls who are always negative.... Pot. Kettle. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|