If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Michael wrote: Then you really didn't understand the physics of how a pitot tube works. Think of a pitot tube as an energy conversion device. There is energy in moving air. There is energy in pressurized air. A pitot tube is a device for converting the former into the latter. An ASI is actually a pressure gauge (usually a brass bellows that drives the needle) that measures the difference between the ram pressure and the static pressure. The ram pressure is always going to be higher, because the speed of the airplane is forcing air in, and pressurizing it. I understood that. I just way over estimated how much air went through the pitot tube. Any tube that has a hole in the front and a smaller hole in the back would do the job. The net pressure to the A/S indicator would be less but that's just a calibration issue. So I understood the concept but over estimated the flow. -Robert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Michael wrote:
I always thought it was worthwhile to show an instrument student a disassembled compass. Once he sees how the counterweight works to compensate for the vertical component of the magnetic field, turning errors are obvious Seeing stuff opened up is always useful. My FBO has a sectioned carburator sitting around in one of the classrooms; I take every opportunity to show people how it works inside. Some of them actually pay attention :-) I also like to pull the cowling off planes and show students what's underneath. Many have never seen anything more than can be seen from the oil filler door. It's very instructive when you see things like the alternate air control opening up a little door on the air filter housing, or tracing out the wires from the plugs to the magnetos. Well, it can be done - but WHY? There is some value in knowing that the radio determines whether to use the VOR or LOC circuitry based on the frequency selected. There is much value to understanding the difference, especially as it applies to the validity of a VOR check for LOC/ILS ops. Memorizing what the actual frequencies are seems rather pointless. I agree that knowing which are VOR and which are LOC is not terribly practical for most pilots, but knowing which are NAV and which are COM is. I've seen more than one pilot keep spinning the knobs on the COM radio trying to to figure out why they can't find 116.6 to get the ATIS. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Well, Jim, it almost COULD work that way, but it doesn't. :-[
VOR azimuth angle is measured by a phase comparison between two sinusoidal signals, not a time-delay measurement. The VOR reference signal is frequency modulated on a subcarrier, while the azimuth signal is from amplitude modulation on the radio-frequency carrier, caused by the VOR's rotating cardioid beam. Separately, DME distance is measured radar-like, by the time it takes for the ground transponder to *reply* with a delayed pulse-pair to an interrogation transmitted from the aircraft. "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:vhDjg.137276$k%3.119945@dukeread12... You can explain how a VOR/DME works with a simple visual model. There is a large lake with an island in the middle. There is a lighthouse with a rotating beacon that makes one revolution a minute. It has a white beacon and a green beacon, when the white beacon is passing North, a big strobe light on top flashes and a very loud horn sounds. You see the strobe light flash and 6 seconds later see the green beacon sweep by. Where are you? 216 degrees from the beacon. Ten seconds after the strobe, you hear the horn, how far away? 2 miles. VOR is the same, just faster. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
1) He showed me disassembled instruments when describing how each works
(how well can most of us explain how an altimeter really works inside, I thought a mag compass was ball shaped ) I always thought it was worthwhile to show an instrument student a disassembled compass. Once he sees how the counterweight works to compensate for the vertical component of the magnetic field, turning errors are obvious - as well as why there are no turning errors while taxiing. Accelerationa and deceleration errors are equally obvious. Calling Jay, calling Jay. Disassembled instruments would be way cool in your aviation themed motel. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Well, Jim, it almost COULD work that way, but it doesn't. :-[
VOR azimuth angle is measured by a phase comparison between two sinusoidal signals, not a time-delay measurement. The VOR reference signal is frequency modulated on a subcarrier, while the azimuth signal is from amplitude modulation on the radio-frequency carrier, caused by the VOR's rotating cardioid beam. It's indirect, but isn't a measurement of phase difference of two different waves the same as the measurement of the time difference between crests (once you take into account the frequency and the speed of light)? It's like saying the alimiter measures altitude. It's not technically correct (and yes, the difference is meaningful under some circumstances) but gets the job done. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
"Jose" wrote in message . com...
Well, Jim, it almost COULD work that way, but it doesn't. :-[ VOR azimuth angle is measured by a phase comparison between two sinusoidal signals, not a time-delay measurement. The VOR reference signal is frequency modulated on a subcarrier, while the azimuth signal is from amplitude modulation on the radio-frequency carrier, caused by the VOR's rotating cardioid beam. It's indirect, but isn't a measurement of phase difference of two different waves the same as the measurement of the time difference between crests (once you take into account the frequency and the speed of light)? It's like saying the alimiter measures altitude. It's not technically correct (and yes, the difference is meaningful under some circumstances) but gets the job done. Jose -- The time domain and the frequency domain are related conventionally through a mathematical manipulation called the Fourier Transform. However, the measurement methods used in the two domains are considerably different. The VOR system was designed for measurements in phase space. DME, of course, was designed for the time domain. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Who cares how it works ?
R u going to build one or fix one ? Know how to operate the equipment and not how the equipment operater - M. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Mitty wrote: You might look at: http://www.dauntless-soft.com/PRODUC...?DMODE=FAATEST I have used their software for written tests and found it to be very good. I tried the "RideReady" Commercial oral package when it was very new, a couple of years ago and at that time I thought it was kind of weak. They don't appear to have anything for the CFII . As it turn out, my instructor knows an enourmous amount of stuff and I'm spending late nights learning stuff I never thought I'd know. 1) He showed me disassembled instruments when describing how each works (how well can most of us explain how an altimeter really works inside, I thought a mag compass was ball shaped ) 2) He also explained how VORs really work (I thought they broadcast actual radials but they actually time the difference between a reference signal and a rotating sweeping signal). 3) He expects me to memorize the freq of markers and be able to distinguish a loc freq from vor freq by looking at the freq number. 4) Even the stuff I thought I knew was wrong. I thought lots of air was always running through the pitot tube and out the drain hole. Apparently only a very, very small amount of air comes out the back of the drain hole and the actual volume of air running through the pitot is very small. Looking at all the books, I got the impression air was just rushing through. -Robert |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I understood that. I just way over estimated how much air went through the pitot tube. Any tube that has a hole in the front and a smaller hole in the back would do the job. The net pressure to the A/S indicator would be less but that's just a calibration issue. So I understood the concept but over estimated the flow. Mea culpa. There was actually something you didn't know (or didn't consider) but it was so obvious to me that I never even thought about it. And really it's much less obvious than the physics - unless you happen to routinely build and design stuff. I say this by way of explanation and apology. You're right - you could in theory have any tube with a bigger hole at the front and a smaller one at the back, and the indication would be less but could be calibrated out. There's a reason it's not done that way, and it has nothing to do with the physics and everything to do with manufacturing practices and standards. ASI's are interchangeable, and it would be a maintenance nightmare not to have them interchangeable. Imagine that every pitot tube had to have its own matching (calibrated) ASI. Often the pitot tube is made by the manufacturer. Fortunately they rarely fail, because replacements are sometimes very expensive or even impossible to find. Piper made its own pitot tubes for a long time. Go try to find one for a short winger. ASI's will all fail eventually. They're made with brass bellows that are soldered together. The solder joints move and hold (just a little) pressure. Eventually they are guaranteed to leak. The leak will show up as a too-low airspeed indication. So for practical purposes, you really need a pitot tube that supplies approximately the right ram pressure. Michael |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
Mark Hansen wrote:
I thought this allowed rain water to drain as well. Otherwise, couldn't the water build up and eventually get into the pressure line to the ASI? If there is a hole, then yes, it will drain water as well, because there is flow into the tube. But without a drain hole, there is no air flow into the pitot tube at all - so how will the rain drops get in? I suppose if you flew through a heavy enough rain it could happen - but that implies flying the plane IFR, and it's pretty rare for a plane to be IFR capable and have no pitot heat. Rare, but not unknown. Michael |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
CFII oral exam guide questions?
I've used this analogy many times to explain VOR operation to students.. but
using one rotating beacon and the flash.. I like the idea of adding the horn for the distance. BT "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... On 06/13/06 12:08, Jim Macklin wrote: Just like the rotating beacon at the airport, the two lights are 180 apart and rotate on the common shaft. Yes, you could have just one light rotating, but two identifiable beacons makes the system more useable and faster. English lesson... "white beacon passing North...green beacon sweeps by" Seems that both are moving. Thanks, but I don't really need the English lesson. Your description made it sound like there were two rotating beacons, and I couldn't see why that was necessary to make the point. I asked the question so you could clarify. Having one rotating beacon seems to illustrate the functionality. If the point is to make the system easy for a student pilot to understand, why not keep it simple? The "useable[sic] and faster" issue isn't really necessary for the student to understand how the system works, IMHO :-) I do like the analogy, though. Thanks, "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... | On 06/13/06 11:15, Jim Macklin wrote: | You can explain how a VOR/DME works with a simple visual | model. | | There is a large lake with an island in the middle. There | is a lighthouse with a rotating beacon that makes one | revolution a minute. It has a white beacon and a green | beacon, when the white beacon is passing North, a big strobe | light on top flashes and a very loud horn sounds. | | You see the strobe light flash and 6 seconds later see the | green beacon sweep by. Where are you? 216 degrees from the | beacon. Ten seconds after the strobe, you hear the horn, | how far away? 2 miles. | | So are both the white and green beacons rotating? | | Don't you just need an omnidirectional strobe (with horn for | distance measurements) and a single rotating beacon? | | | VOR is the same, just faster. | | | Steer your boat so the bow always points to the light and | you've got an ADF homer. | | | | | | | -- | Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane | Cal Aggie Flying Farmers | Sacramento, CA -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oral Exam Prep -- recommendations and recollections | Nicholas Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | November 15th 04 05:00 PM |
Training for my CFII - Got a couple questions | BoDEAN | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 3rd 04 12:42 PM |