If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
B-24 Liberator
I have been doing some research and was amazed at the B-24's accident
rate. From April 10, 1944 to August 31,1944, the Replacement Training Unit at Chatham AAF, Savannah, Georgia had 23 accidents. In those accidents, nine of the B-24 were destroyed and there were 54 deaths. My question: Was the B-24 particularly difficult to fly? How difficult was it in relation to the B-17? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The comments about this being a Naval Aviation News Group are, of course, well taken, but I trained in and flew the Navy version of the B-24 in Hutchinson, Kansas, over fifty years ago, immediately after basic training in the SNJ (T-6). I guess we didn't know any better but I don't recall it being an exceptional challenge or a particularly dangerous or accident prone aircraft. It was, however, a damn truck at first, until you got used to it - and I think someone else has commented on its taxi and climb characteristics. I recall it as an easier aircraft to land than some of the 30 or so types I subsequently flew - just line up that protrusion (was it a Navigators bubble or part of the nose turret?) with the right horizon reference for the landing weight and fly it in. It might be interesting to you to get the accident statistics for NAS Hutchinson, KA, in the early fifties - which I don't recall as being significant - and compare them to your Air Force numbers. Might show that the Navy's basic training was a better prelude to the aircraft that the AF version. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Navy did not have much luck with the B-24 (PB4Y) either. In just
ten days at Miramar (Camp Kearny), there were three crashes with 36 fatalities. One was lost on takeoff. There has to some other explanation other than the low flying time of the pilots. I went straight from receiving my wings to C-118 (DC-6) transition in the early 1960s and don't recall any particular problems. Of course, I always had a instructor along, but he never had to take it away from me. None of the other new pilots had any particular problems either that I was aware of. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:31:37 -0800, Dale wrote: Yes and no on the B-24 being harder to fly. I had no multi-engine time or large aircraft time when I started flying the bombers. I had a still wet multi engine rating and a bunch of Cessna time. G I started on the B-17 and found it to be just an airplane. (A 50K pound, 4 engine taildragger...but still just an airplane.) In 20 or 30 hours I was able to takeoff, land and taxi safely...not up to type rating standards but safe enough. After quite a bit of time in the -17 I started flying the -24. She just wasn't as much fun to fly. It's a pain to taxi, needs lots of runway, climbs like a pig, is heavy on the controls, engine out work is WORK, is difficult to trim in pitch and tough to get a greaser landing in. But as I flew her and got to know how to handle her I started to like her more and more. She became easy to taxi, you get used to the control forces, trimming wasn't really all that hard and if you worked at it you could roll the mains on and hold that nosewheel off until you ran out of elevator. Both the -17 and the -24 have their difficult areas and their easy areas. the WWII training accidents...remember that the guys getting into these airplanes only had a couple hundred hours of flying time. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Might show that the Navy's basic training was a
better prelude to the aircraft that the AF version. I don't want to get into an inter-service squabble, but learning to put the SNJ on an aircraft carrier, even though it wasn't very hard, may have added bit to our stick-and-rudder skills. vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Specs for a B24D Liberator | John T. Slodyczka | Military Aviation | 0 | November 21st 03 02:18 AM |
B-24 Liberator | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 14 | September 2nd 03 03:56 PM |