A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 22nd 03, 11:01 PM
John Halliwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , The
Enlightenment writes
However I still suspect that a simple rear gunner lieing in the prone
position could be built not to reduce speed too much.


I guess it puts a lot of weight (the gunner) very far back, which would
probably have large effects on handling. Just fixed guns with lots of
tracer might be effective, especially as a tail chase was quite likely.

The ultimate gunnery system in WWII, particularly for night ops was
probably the radar guided system used on some Lancasters (Village Inn
perhaps?). Whether this could have been incorporated into a small tail
turret remotely controlled from the cockpit is another question.

--
John
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.