If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Reed wrote: One of my favourite exercises for my annual checkouts as a UK Basic Instructor is the spin off a simulated winch launch (only try this at height with an appropriate instructor with you!). Simulate a winch launch by diving to 90 kt and then pulling up at 45 degrees. As the speed drops to about 60 kt cry "BANG - cable break", and push over into the normal flying attitude. The moment normal attitude is reached, begin a co-ordinated turn. I've recently been doing this as a student and personally I found it a very valuable lesson as (a) it required no "forcing" from the instructor to initiate the spin and (b) it makes you realise how quickly you can transition from an apparently normal flying attitude into a serious situation. Chris Gadsby |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Bill,
In fact, at least according to US regs, a winch launch IS an aerobatic manuever. But that wasn't my point. If normal recovery from a normal operation places the pilot on the ragged edge of a deep stall, then I think it best to characterize the operation as "ab"normal., requiring reactions unique to that environment. And thus my toying with the term aerobatic. There remains a problem with this argument, however. Maybe the subject of a different thread. BTW, have you demonstrated this maneuver without revocery? IE, have you left the controls in place to let the spin fully develop? |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ps.com... Bill, In fact, at least according to US regs, a winch launch IS an aerobatic manuever. I believe you are referring to the +-30 degrees pitch and +-45 degrees bank definition of aerobatics. I believe there is an exclusion for aircraft for which these are normal maneuvers. Gliders routinely exceed these values thus they are not considered aerobatic for gliders. But that wasn't my point. If normal recovery from a normal operation places the pilot on the ragged edge of a deep stall, then I think it best to characterize the operation as "ab"normal., requiring reactions unique to that environment. And thus my toying with the term aerobatic. Normal winch operation does not place the glider on the ragged edge of a stall. A normal launch places the max AOA very near that for best L/D. A wire break handled properly with a prompt pushover is flown at a still lower AOA with the airspeed not dropping below 1.3 x Vs or so. The margin is even greater when you consider that the pushover is at less than one G so the stall airspeed is lower. The wire break training maneuver described by Chris is to show an instructor candidate what can happen if the student is allowed to mis-handle the wire break and is WAY outside normal operation. The whole point is to drum into the instructors who will then insist that his students learn that the nose must be promptly lowered well below normal glide and the airspeed seen to be at a safe value and increasing before any thought is given to a turn. This is to establish and maintain a large safety margin. In many cases no turn is necessary and the glider lands on the remaining runway. BTW, have you demonstrated this maneuver without recovery? IE, have you left the controls in place to let the spin fully develop? Yes, It is a normal spin with a normal recovery at least with the trainers in common use. The wire break recovery being discussed here is safer and less dramatic than the equivalent airtow maneuver consisting of a 200 foot AGL release on departure and a turn back to the runway. Bill Daniels |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Silly me, playing too loosely with terms.
What interests me is that recovery from a cable break, if misapplied, appears to place the pilot in a very unusual situation. This flight condition was presented to put into question the abolutism of some simple control movements that should keep pilots out of danger of loss of control. So my question becomes one of instructional emphasis. Since some problems evolve so quickly that thoughtful consideration isn't always a best first course, some absolutes are needed. But if you are flying outside normal flight conditions (IE, aerobatics or cable break recoveries), those absolutes might not apply. Yanking the stick back to neutral to fix the horizon on the canopy at the top of a cable break recovery qualifies as departing from normal flight conditions. But I certainly see the problem you face. We train pilots to take note of a stick well aft as one sign of an imminent stall. They might not so quickly recognize that the glider can be stalled with the stick at neutral under these conditions. Nor might they realize that coordination of ailerons and rudder has changed at extremely low airpseed. Thus the opportunity to enter a wing low stall with your hands and feet in a position that should normally signal safe flight. All that said, I spent about 15 minutes on Sunday afternoon experimenting with this maneuver. The results weren't as previously published, so I'll need to take some time to write up the results. I'll start this as a new thread. Bill Daniels wrote: wrote in message ps.com... Bill, In fact, at least according to US regs, a winch launch IS an aerobatic manuever. I believe you are referring to the +-30 degrees pitch and +-45 degrees bank definition of aerobatics. I believe there is an exclusion for aircraft for which these are normal maneuvers. Gliders routinely exceed these values thus they are not considered aerobatic for gliders. But that wasn't my point. If normal recovery from a normal operation places the pilot on the ragged edge of a deep stall, then I think it best to characterize the operation as "ab"normal., requiring reactions unique to that environment. And thus my toying with the term aerobatic. Normal winch operation does not place the glider on the ragged edge of a stall. A normal launch places the max AOA very near that for best L/D. A wire break handled properly with a prompt pushover is flown at a still lower AOA with the airspeed not dropping below 1.3 x Vs or so. The margin is even greater when you consider that the pushover is at less than one G so the stall airspeed is lower. The wire break training maneuver described by Chris is to show an instructor candidate what can happen if the student is allowed to mis-handle the wire break and is WAY outside normal operation. The whole point is to drum into the instructors who will then insist that his students learn that the nose must be promptly lowered well below normal glide and the airspeed seen to be at a safe value and increasing before any thought is given to a turn. This is to establish and maintain a large safety margin. In many cases no turn is necessary and the glider lands on the remaining runway. BTW, have you demonstrated this maneuver without recovery? IE, have you left the controls in place to let the spin fully develop? Yes, It is a normal spin with a normal recovery at least with the trainers in common use. The wire break recovery being discussed here is safer and less dramatic than the equivalent airtow maneuver consisting of a 200 foot AGL release on departure and a turn back to the runway. Bill Daniels |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry I do not see that finding yourself in a condition
where the nose is well up above the horizon, airspeed rapidly decaying with the possibility of increase wing load from hanging cable can be described as 'normal'. It is a situation we train pilots to recover from but it also goes against the normal training in that the reference to the horizon means less than normal. During the launch the attitude to of the glider to the relative airflow is within the normal parameters. As soon as the launch fails, for whatever reason, the situation becomes abnormal. Lowering the nose to an attitude relative to the horizon will not result in instant recovery. My way of teaching was for the student to carry out the corrective action and then ask a simple questions. Do I have the approach attitude? Answer no, correct, answer yes then 'Do I have the approach airspeed? answer no, check response to answer yes, if that is still yes then wait until the answer to the airspeed question is yes. When the answer to both questions is yes, then and only then decide on the most appropriate course of action and implement. Works for me and I have survived 10000 winch launches At 12:18 27 June 2005, Stefan wrote: wrote: But if you are flying outside normal flight conditions (IE, aerobatics or cable break recoveries), A cable brake during a winch launch is a perfectly normal flight condition, and as such, is regulariliy trained. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems you didn't do many winch launches, did you? Stefan |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Yanking the stick back to neutral to fix the horizon on the canopy at the top of a cable break recovery qualifies as departing from normal flight conditions. We agree. This is the reason for the training scenario which teaches avoidance of this situation. But I certainly see the problem you face. We train pilots to take note of a stick well aft as one sign of an imminent stall. They might not so quickly recognize that the glider can be stalled with the stick at neutral under these conditions. To stop the nose at the normal gliding attitude after a wire break requires a powerful elevator and full back stick. This is definitely a pilot induced stall resulting from a mis-use of the elevator. However, accident records show that this has occasionally been the cause of a spin accident so the training scenario was added. To repeat what I wrote earlier, this is merely a slight variant of an accelerated stall. If the stick were held neutral, the nose would fall through to a steep nose down attitude. This is not the best technique but it wouldn't result in a deep stall. Bill Daniels |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Don Johnstone wrote:
Sorry I do not see that finding yourself in a condition where the nose is well up above the horizon, airspeed rapidly decaying with the possibility of increase wing load from hanging cable can be described as 'normal'. We can argue the meaning of the word normal. For me, everything which happens from time to time and is no surprize is normal. In winch launches, cable breakes do occur and are to be expected. So they are normal me, just a variant. But there's no need to argue about this word. It is a situation we train pilots to recover from but it also goes against the normal training in that the reference to the horizon means less than normal. Again, what is normal? In flat land, during normal flight, the horizon is the reference, so that's normal. In mountains, having no natural horizon but only an imaginary one is normal. And in a winch launch, not referring to the horizon is normal, at least to me. Lowering the nose to an attitude relative to the horizon will not result in instant recovery. Exactly, that's why, after a cable break (or after "normal" release, for that matter), ist "normal" not to refer to the horizon in the same way as during free flight. Different conditions, different techniques. Nothing abnormal. My way of teaching was for the student to carry out I'm sure you instruct your students correctly. The only thing I jumped on was the statement that there was something "abnormal" in a winch launch. Again, different conditions require different techniques, which means different normalities. This is the approach I take: Normality depends on cirumstance, so broaden your view and your repertoire of techniques. Stefan |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
No. Several dozen.
BTW, For the purposes of this section, aerobatic flight means an intentional maneuver involving an abrupt change in an aircraft's attitude, an abnormal attitude, or abnormal acceleration, not necessary for normal flight. This is from the US FARs. While we can discuss ad nauseum whether a winch launch is an aerobatic maneuver... (and really it isn't), it clearly requries control motions that constitute aerobatic flight, and as such represent a "special" set of circumstances. Note that Chris introduced me to a manuever which can be accurately described as outside the parameters of normal flight (IE, abrupt change in aircraft attitude). In preparing to defend the efficacy of winch launching, you're missing my point. There is a disconnect between the control actions required for safe recovery from a cable break and the correction of a stall and/or dropping wing during normal flight. My point is that the cable break recovery is a special case and needs to be discussed in depth, and differentiated from the "normal" control movements to establish and maintain controlled flight. But I digress. This is the subject of new thread. BTW, I learned to winch launch under the tutelage of a BGA instructor in Britain. This concern of the snap spin was never discussed. Recovery of airspeed, certainly, but no warning against starting a turn. Per the particulars of earlier notes in this thread, I'll offer some opinions at length based on what I experienced in my glider yesterday, but it'll be a few days before I can take the time to document them. Stefan wrote: wrote: But if you are flying outside normal flight conditions (IE, aerobatics or cable break recoveries), A cable brake during a winch launch is a perfectly normal flight condition, and as such, is regulariliy trained. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems you didn't do many winch launches, did you? Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |