If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Another stall spin
On 9/13/2012 8:52 AM, Mark Jardini wrote:
I had an incipient departure just the other day. I fly an Apis M. In deconstructing the event, I saw the nose dropping and not responding to back pressure so I put the stick forward and it was all over in a second. Your response is "the universal ticket for departure control"...works (rapidly/"instantly") in any glider, regardless of wing appurtenances. I found this true even with "so notorious a departer" as the two 2-32's my club has had over the years, one of which "always" departed enthusiastically left wing low if Joe Pilot insisted on ignoring prior aerodynamic warnings. Merely relaxing aft pressure completely eliminated its "departure thrills", to the point that a marginally aware accompanying pilot might never even be aware what had transpired. Another good reason to be primed to "relax back pressure" is gust-induced "significant separation" absolutely halted upward progress in my 15-meter unballasted ship when it occurred - for ~30 seconds, as measured by altimeter and sweep second hand. (Gravity never stops!) A "calibrated butt" could easily feel this effect, while a calibrated ear could actually hear it as well. And, of course, it could be felt throughout the plane's control system. Awesome way to depress your average climb rate! Maybe pilots in the intermountain west get more unbidden opportunites to practice "the stick bump" while thermalling, simply because in my experience on the downwind side of the Continental Divide, gust-induced incipient stalls are "the norm" during routine thermalling on days with any significant westerly (which is to say most of them!). - - - - - - I think when the aircraft doesn't do what it should for the input, there should be a reflex alternative action. Either flaps or stick forward is probably ok. The stick feels more like it has more authority to me. In a fully established spin, flaps have to come off as you will likely exceed the white arc in recovery. The dicey scenarios are the ones where you have to think out what is going on before acting. The whole thinking thing is easily derailed. Mark Good thinking! Regards, Bob W. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Another stall spin
I think we need to make a very clear distinction between incipient spin and developed spin. The SSA has a bronze badge study guide of which one of the questions is... "What corrective action should be taken if, while thermalling at minimum sink speed in turbulent air, the left wing drops while turning to the left" The answer to this question is NOT apply opposite rudder. The correct answer is "lower the nose before applying opposite rudder and aileron pressure"
I have never practiced spins in a glider. I'm wondering, for those who have done so. Is it common to become confused as to which direction you are spinning? I practice spins in Condor and this often happens. I'm curious if Condor spin characteristcs are very realistic. Based on recovery procedures, I'm guessing not. Incipient spins happen a lot in Condor, especially with full water working narrow thermals. Full water makes it much harder to recover. .... Aaron |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Another stall spin
On 9/12/2012 2:06 AM, BruceGreeff wrote:
Hi Eric Sorry to be obscure - I think we actually agree entirely. Follow the standard procedure until the spin stops. I am sure you are way more experienced than I. So - free opinion and worth every cent you paid. Aviate first comment applies to thinking all the time - rather than applying rote process. In my experience - It helps to always try to have the objective in mind when you do something in the cockpit. In a departure from controlled flight, that is turning into "something" the first thing to do is to correct the condition that caused the departure. In the instances we were discussing that is a stalled wing. If your primary objective is to un-stall the wing then, again in my limited experience, the manual on a flapped ship says something along the lines of "reduce the flap setting". So my thinking is first move flaps to neutral or negative as indicated. This will reduce AoA, and MAY arrest the departure. Then one should assess what the aircraft is actually doing. If and only if you are simultaneously rotating about all three axes with relatively stable speed and the G force is not increasing and the other indicators unique to the type of aircraft you are flying indicate that you are in fact spinning - then the logical thing to do is to initiate the standard spin recovery. If you are in a steeply descending turn with airspeed increasing and experiencing elevated G load, you are probably in a spiral dive. If you are - like Bruno - simply in a bit of a slip, with one wing low and airspeed and control normal, well straighten up and fly right. In the vast majority of gliders the reduction in AoA from flap change will arrest the departure. The aircraft may be at an unusual attitude, but it is fully under control. (as was the case in the video) Following a rote spin recovery in this situation is irrational , and with a flapped ship it may be especially dangerous. Many gliders will accelerate rapidly enough that - especially if you have not reduced the flap setting - you will exceed limiting speed for the aircraft configuration and damage something. In at least two cases I have seen this was at least a contributory factor in a fatality. Therefore I advocate - first reduce AoA, by changing flap - that way you have taken the action most likely to recover with the minimum disturbance and very importantly, you have configured your aircraft for the possible / probable high speed that will eventuate if you do have to recover from a fully developed spin or spiral dive. And then continue with the rest of the standard recovery process until the spin is arrested. Again I think we agree - the critical point for me is that in a flapped aircraft the flaps should be the first control input, and that the result of each input should be assessed lest you do something inappropriate to the circumstances simply because it is the next action on the standard recovery procedure. It's my understanding from my flight manual that the flap reduction and the standard spin recovery motions are to be applied simultaneously. Applying the flap reduction first can work (at least, under some circumstances), but it is not what is specified in the manual, and I have had no problems by doing the two things simultaneously. Why wait to see if the flap reduction fails? That will only increase the height lost and allow the glider to go further into the spin. As a thought - consider what might have happened with Bruno if he had immediately centralised the controls without changing flap first. I have not watched the video, but the standard spin recovery does not include centralizing the controls (the ailerons - yes, the stick and rudder - no). Had Bruno done standard spin recovery, my belief is the glider would have recovered immediately, and he could have continued thermalling with very little height loss or disruption. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Another stall spin
On 9/13/2012 9:39 PM, akiley wrote:
I think we need to make a very clear distinction between incipient spin and developed spin. The SSA has a bronze badge study guide of which one of the questions is... "What corrective action should be taken if, while thermalling at minimum sink speed in turbulent air, the left wing drops while turning to the left" The answer to this question is NOT apply opposite rudder. The correct answer is "lower the nose before applying opposite rudder and aileron pressure" Whether we're talking "an uncommanded (by Joe Pilot) departure" or "a fully developed spin", neither can happen unless one wing is sufficiently above its critical angle of attack that lift-reduction/increased-drag leads to loss of lateral stability (hence the uncommanded wing drop). Anything serving to maintain the more-stalled wing in that condition will also serve to maintain (in a fully developed spin) or worsen (in the case of an uncommanded departure) the condition. Presuming Joe Pilot doesn't want the condition to worsen or continue, a useful way to think of "corrective action" is to prioritize the sequence of potential actions by those most likely to reduce the critical AoA ASAP. Then the SSA's answer makes perfect sense. Why? Recovery can NOT occur until the wings are both again flying (i.e. below their critical AoA). (Understanding - and *believing* the preceding claim is crucial to burning the proper corrective actions into one's noodle.) While "instant opposite rudder" *might* prove useful (by slewing the nose around and thereby potentially reducing the lower wing's AoA due to the hoped-for velocity increase), success along those lines presumes sufficient rudder authority and aerodynamic energy/conditions to halt-then-overcome the rotational inertia of the already-/increasingly-rotating glider. OTOH, reducing AoA directly via the stick is almost *guaranteed* to have "an instantaneous effect" because gravity never quits, and - in this situation - is working *for* you. Once you're unstalled, the rudder has a better chance of assisting with recovery... - - - - - - I have never practiced spins in a glider. I'm wondering, for those who have done so. Is it common to become confused as to which direction you are spinning? Making no claims to be a spinning expert, and noting all my spins have been upright (i.e. not inverted), I've never come close to being confused on spin direction. Obviously (he sez! :-)) it IS possible to become confused, but I'd guess most easily so in any simulator lacking "G-clues". Perhaps the real world equivalent would be by entering a spin only after "sufficient preceding aerobatics" to overwhelm Joe Pilot's experience base. In "normal thermalling (and by extension, landing pattern) flight" when you experience an uncommanded wing drop (meaning, possibly an uncommanded departure/incipient spin), between a) the obvious "falling to one side" sensation, and b) the rotation of the world beyond the canopy, direction has always seemed to me immediately obvious...and of course, you probably had been cheating toward the spin direction with rudder, too, right?!? (Meaning, a halfway aware pilot should already know "without having to think about it" when he's in a situation predisposing him to an uncommanded departure, and WHY!!! What may happen next - and in what direction - "should be obvious...") The above presumes we're NOT talking about the possibility of "over the top" spin entries. While they're possible - and demonstrable in some gliders - they're not the ones that commonly kill in the landing pattern, nor are they commonly experienced while thermalling. Key word being "commonly"... Stated another way, "in real life" you're "almost always" going to spin the direction you're already turning. "No confusion necessary!" I practice spins in Condor and this often happens. I'm curious if Condor spin characteristcs are very realistic. Based on recovery procedures, I'm guessing not. Incipient spins happen a lot in Condor, especially with full water working narrow thermals. Full water makes it much harder to recover. ... Aaron HTH! Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
It's Da' Spin,Boss! Da' Spin! | [email protected] | Home Built | 8 | November 19th 08 10:28 PM |
Stall/ Spin testing the RV-12 | cavelamb himself[_4_] | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 08 07:01 PM |
Glider Stall Spin Video on YouTube | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | July 5th 07 08:56 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |