A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bum Dope



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 23rd 03, 08:46 PM
Veeduber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bum Dope

23 October 2003

I recently told a fellow he should be using a different cam in his engine.

Later messages made it clear I had been talking to the wrong guy. (I get lots
of mail.) Trouble is, now I can't remember WHO I was talking to. So here's a
general retraction, cross-posted.

If you're planning to fly behind a stock 1600cc VW engine I think you should
keep the stock cam. That assumes you're swinging a long, efficient prop at
2500 to 3000 rpm. The cam I referred you toward does fine on big-bore strokers
but does WORSE than the stock cam when used on engines having displacement of
120cid or less. (Stock is about 96cid; 1834 is about 112.)

If you went ahead and bought the other cam, I'll buy it off you.

-R.S.Hoover


  #2  
Old October 24th 03, 02:33 AM
Del Rawlins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 23 Oct 2003 11:46 AM, Veeduber posted the following:
23 October 2003

I recently told a fellow he should be using a different cam in his
engine.

Later messages made it clear I had been talking to the wrong guy. (I
get lots of mail.) Trouble is, now I can't remember WHO I was talking
to. So here's a general retraction, cross-posted.

If you're planning to fly behind a stock 1600cc VW engine I think you
should keep the stock cam. That assumes you're swinging a long,
efficient prop at 2500 to 3000 rpm. The cam I referred you toward
does fine on big-bore strokers but does WORSE than the stock cam when
used on engines having displacement of 120cid or less. (Stock is
about 96cid; 1834 is about 112.)

If you went ahead and bought the other cam, I'll buy it off you.


Class act. Hopefully you'll catch him in time.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What other industry uses butyrate dope? Michael Horowitz Home Built 0 August 17th 03 06:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.