If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. . Not such a good deal unless what they are looking for is a profession which has people who are willing to pay to work. Or if your insurance company won't cover you in your own airplane until you have 50 hours. I really dislike insurance companies, so have no problems when it comes to finding loopholes. This is the link for the cheap multi-time http://www.multiengine.net/ $60/hour for 50 hours. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
If your knowledge test is near expiration, you can take the ATP ride in a
single, and then take the MEL ride anytime, just to save taking the "written test" again. "Jackal24" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote in | : | | Go to Spartan or Flight Safety and get the ATP and CFI ME, they will | hire you when you get the ticket, which will take about 25 hours | total, then you get paid to instruct in the school for 50-100 hours a | month. There are lots of schools that hire their "good" graduates and | absorb the low time MEI. Check in your area. | | I would rather get done in just a couple of weeks. I have around $10k to | spend on this. (a donation) | | You can also take the ATP ride in a single and then do the MEL as an | add-on ATP. | | | | What would be the point of that? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
On Dec 10, 5:33 am, "nobody" wrote:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in 6.130... Not such a good deal unless what they are looking for is a profession which has people who are willing to pay to work. Or if your insurance company won't cover you in your own airplane until you have 50 hours. I really dislike insurance companies, so have no problems when it comes to finding loopholes. This is the link for the cheap multi-time http://www.multiengine.net/ $60/hour for 50 hours. This place looks like a scam to me. I have seen these before and I can tell you that the FAA does not consider this logable PIC time. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"nobody" wrote ... Or if your insurance company won't cover you in your own airplane until you have 50 hours. I really dislike insurance companies, so have no problems when it comes to finding loopholes. That's funny. Insurance companies don't "dislike" you, they dislike losing money. They compare you to others with similar "paper documented" experience. And finding that those "comparables" have a poor risk performance the insurance companies choose not to give you a $100,000 risk coverage for the next 12 months for $1000. They may give you that for $10,000, or they may say "Hey, go get some experience, ding up a few things, and come back and see us then". Don't take it personally, they have a bigger pot of money on the line. That's the only reason you go to them in the first place (for access to their pot of money). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"nobody" wrote in
news:Sma7j.13031$Bg7.3910@trndny07: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message .. . Not such a good deal unless what they are looking for is a profession which has people who are willing to pay to work. Or if your insurance company won't cover you in your own airplane until you have 50 hours. I really dislike insurance companies, so have no problems when it comes to finding loopholes. This is the link for the cheap multi-time http://www.multiengine.net/ $60/hour for 50 hours. Well, that one's not so bad. I was thinking more of the scumbags that make FO's pay to work for them. A pox on them! Bertie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"Mike Isaksen" wrote in message
news:PSc7j.5756$581.814@trnddc04... "nobody" wrote ... Or if your insurance company won't cover you in your own airplane until you have 50 hours. I really dislike insurance companies, so have no problems when it comes to finding loopholes. That's funny. Insurance companies don't "dislike" you, they dislike losing money. They compare you to others with similar "paper documented" experience. But they do like re-writing the rules. #1) I own two automobiles. I cannot possibly drive two automobiles at the same time, yet the insurance company charges me double the premium because "Somebody *could* drive the other car" #2) I've owned said second vehicle since before my son was born. Because he is now licensed to drive, he *MUST* be listed as the primary driver of the vehicle he's not allowed to touch. #3) Because the insurance was doubled, I took said vehicle off the road and bought a $250 car for my son. Now, second son gets license. Adding him as an occational driver of $250 car will not result in premium increase, because primary driver is also inexperienced. They say he cannot be listed as an occational driver of the only vehicle he's allowed to drive, and *MUST* be listed as an occational driver of my car (75% increase in my premium). If the insurance company refused to insure me for the appropriate risk, I will do anything *LEGAL* to reduce my premium. BTW, if you google http://www.multiengine.net/ , you'll see they have both supporters and detractors. Since I only fly one airplane, with one engine, I have no need for their program. I was just answering the question asked. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
Well, that one's not so bad. I was thinking more of the scumbags that make FO's pay to work for them. A pox on them! Doesn't sound vastly different to me. But, Hey, This is America. Capitalism at it's best. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
"nobody" wrote in news:OLd7j.1065$W27.439@trndny09:
"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message Well, that one's not so bad. I was thinking more of the scumbags that make FO's pay to work for them. A pox on them! Doesn't sound vastly different to me. But, Hey, This is America. Capitalism at it's best. At it's worst, more like. The rest depends on whether you're doing anything useful in the airplane as to whether it's actually worth doing. If you're the autopilot for four hours it's next to useless from a training point of view, but it might help with the logbook. But, as another poster has pointed out, it might not even be legally loggable if you're not legal to do the work in the airplane. I can see his point. However, if you're checked out in the airplane and have a commercial, you should be able to log it as PIC time. It's not 135, itt's just aerial work. Been a while since I had to think about all that stuff, though. Thanks God I won't have to again.. Bertie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
On Dec 9, 9:43 am, Jackal24 wrote:
Anyone have any ideas on where to go to get around 50 hours of multi-time cheap? I looked at AriBen, but the reviews lately are not too great. There did used to be an outfit that paired up ME pilots in order to gain time. The two pilots split the cost and the flying pilot would always be under the hood (so they could both log it). I can't remember the name though. -Robert |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Multi time building Q
On Dec 9, 9:32 pm, Jackal24 wrote:
"Jim Macklin" wrote : Go to Spartan or Flight Safety and get the ATP and CFI ME, they will hire you when you get the ticket, which will take about 25 hours total, then you get paid to instruct in the school for 50-100 hours a month. There are lots of schools that hire their "good" graduates and absorb the low time MEI. Check in your area. I would rather get done in just a couple of weeks. I have around $10k to spend on this. (a donation) You can also take the ATP ride in a single and then do the MEL as an add-on ATP. What would be the point of that? Because he can't take the ATP ME with only 50 hours in ME time. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multi Engine & Time Building? Multiengine.net | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 15 | October 15th 05 12:05 AM |
Time Building Multi Engine | Midway Aviators | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | March 9th 04 04:57 AM |
Time Building Multi Engine | Midway Aviators | Products | 0 | March 9th 04 04:57 AM |
Time Building Multi Engine | Midway Aviators | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 9th 04 04:55 AM |
Time Building Multi Engine | Midway Aviators | Piloting | 0 | March 9th 04 04:54 AM |