If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Whitt" wrote in message nk.net... Y'all, Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student. I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less. Gene Whitt All good answers. I would add that an examination of two polars for a particular glider, one ballasted and one not, will show a crossover airspeed above which the sink rate with ballast is less than without - very counterintuitive. Most modern gliders flying in conditions with greater than 2Kt thermals will spend 80% of their X/C time flying at airspeeds above the crossover point where the sink rate is reduced by using ballast. Flying fast with reduced sink is dramatic. Bill Daniels |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On 11 Oct 2005 03:52:06 -0700, "Andy" wrote:
Edit to 25 words. "A glider is a gravity-powered machine. The heavier it is, the more power it has." 16 words, beat that! -Pat |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The polar documents the phenomenon, it does not explain it. Any
attempt to explain the use of ballast by reference to the polar should leave any intelligent person asking - but why does the polar do that. I believe the effect can only be explained by considering the system energy exchange. Once that is understood the effect on the polar family is intuitive. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
But I need the same amount of power to go the same speed don't I? Why
does more power reduce my sink rate? I think you'll need more than 16 words. Andy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The polar documents the phenomenon, it does not explain it. Any
attempt to explain the use of ballast by reference to the polar should leave any intelligent person asking - but why does the polar do that. I believe the effect can only be explained by considering the system energy exchange. Once that is understood the effect on the polar family is intuitive. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ but loses all the effects due to Reynolds number which is an aerodynamic phenomena and the original question was about the aerodynamics, not the dynamics. Rgds, Derrick Steed |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Whitt wrote:
Y'all, Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student. I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less. Gene Whitt E=M(CxC) Paul |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Whitt wrote:
Y'all, Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase=20 performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student. =20 I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less. Gene Whitt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ buy glider, put water in, launch, do 100 knots, note sink rate, dump water, land, fly, do 100 knots note sink rate, job done Rgds, Derrick Steed |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Thermalling stores energy in the glider, but thermals stop at
cloud base. Water carried needs to be lifted too, thus more energy can be harnessed. jk "Gene Whitt" wrote in message nk.net... Y'all, Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student. I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less. Gene Whitt |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everyone. Now for a 'yes' or 'no' answer to my follow-up
question. Does the addition of weight have the same effect on airplanes with power off and prop stopped as on gliders but at a less efficient level.? Gene Aside: I once dove a C-150 to 120 mph before stopped prop would start the engine, |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
A glider is a gravity-powered machine.
A sled is a gravity-powered machine. A glider is solar powered......... ============== Leon McAtee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airbus A380 water purification | john smith | Piloting | 1 | July 7th 05 02:50 AM |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Water, water, everywhere, but none for thirsty wings.... | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 0 | November 21st 04 03:14 PM |
Questions regarding Air/Oil Separators | Doodybutch | Owning | 6 | April 20th 04 05:56 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |