A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aerodynamics of carrying water



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 11th 05, 05:27 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gene Whitt" wrote in message
nk.net...
Y'all,
Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since
gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase
performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student.

I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less.

Gene Whitt



All good answers.

I would add that an examination of two polars for a particular glider, one
ballasted and one not, will show a crossover airspeed above which the sink
rate with ballast is less than without - very counterintuitive.

Most modern gliders flying in conditions with greater than 2Kt thermals will
spend 80% of their X/C time flying at airspeeds above the crossover point
where the sink rate is reduced by using ballast.

Flying fast with reduced sink is dramatic.

Bill Daniels

  #12  
Old October 11th 05, 05:38 PM
Pat Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 11 Oct 2005 03:52:06 -0700, "Andy" wrote:


Edit to 25 words.


"A glider is a gravity-powered machine. The heavier it is, the more
power it has."

16 words, beat that!

-Pat

  #13  
Old October 11th 05, 05:43 PM
Andy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The polar documents the phenomenon, it does not explain it. Any
attempt to explain the use of ballast by reference to the polar should
leave any intelligent person asking - but why does the polar do that.
I believe the effect can only be explained by considering the system
energy exchange. Once that is understood the effect on the polar
family is intuitive.

  #14  
Old October 11th 05, 07:10 PM
Andy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But I need the same amount of power to go the same speed don't I? Why
does more power reduce my sink rate?

I think you'll need more than 16 words.


Andy

  #15  
Old October 11th 05, 07:31 PM
Derrick Steed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The polar documents the phenomenon, it does not explain it. Any
attempt to explain the use of ballast by reference to the polar should
leave any intelligent person asking - but why does the polar do that.
I believe the effect can only be explained by considering the system
energy exchange. Once that is understood the effect on the polar
family is intuitive.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~

but loses all the effects due to Reynolds number which is an aerodynamic
phenomena and the original question was about the aerodynamics, not the
dynamics.


Rgds,

Derrick Steed




  #16  
Old October 11th 05, 08:22 PM
P.Corbett (ZZ)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gene Whitt wrote:
Y'all,
Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since
gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase
performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student.

I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less.

Gene Whitt


E=M(CxC)

Paul
  #17  
Old October 11th 05, 08:58 PM
Derrick Steed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gene Whitt wrote:
Y'all,
Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since
gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to increase=20
performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student.
=20
I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less.

Gene Whitt


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~

buy glider, put water in, launch, do 100 knots, note sink rate, dump
water, land, fly, do 100 knots note sink rate, job done


Rgds,

Derrick Steed




  #18  
Old October 11th 05, 11:51 PM
Jim Kelly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thermalling stores energy in the glider, but thermals stop at
cloud base. Water carried needs to be lifted too, thus more
energy can be harnessed.

jk


"Gene Whitt" wrote in message
nk.net...
Y'all,
Been many years on rec.aviation.student but even more years since
gliding. Unable to explain the 'why' of water ballast to
increase
performance in gliders to argumentative airplane student.

I need a simple explanation in 25 words or less.

Gene Whitt


  #19  
Old October 12th 05, 02:30 AM
Gene Whitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks everyone. Now for a 'yes' or 'no' answer to my follow-up
question.

Does the addition of weight have the same effect on airplanes with power off
and prop stopped as on gliders but at a less efficient level.?

Gene
Aside: I once dove a C-150 to 120 mph before stopped prop
would start the engine,


  #20  
Old October 12th 05, 03:58 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A glider is a gravity-powered machine.

A sled is a gravity-powered machine. A glider is solar
powered.........
==============
Leon McAtee

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airbus A380 water purification john smith Piloting 1 July 7th 05 02:50 AM
Induction System Water Problem Mike Spera Owning 1 January 30th 05 05:29 AM
Water, water, everywhere, but none for thirsty wings.... Chris OCallaghan Soaring 0 November 21st 04 03:14 PM
Questions regarding Air/Oil Separators Doodybutch Owning 6 April 20th 04 05:56 PM
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? The Enlightenment Military Aviation 3 December 18th 03 09:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.