A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Re pilot training dropout percentage.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 03, 04:19 AM
QDurham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re pilot training dropout percentage.

Face it. Dropout % is almost exclusively dependent on selection process. With
perfect selection requirements one would have near zero drop outs. When I went
through the NavCad program in the early 50s, one needed to pass a bunch of Navy
exams, be physically adequate, and have 2 years college in any major.
Admittedly the navy was hungry for pilots at that time, but I suspect the
overall dropout % was about 10%.

We didn't start out (after 6 months pre flight) in Piper Cubs. We started out
in SNJ/T6s -- in which everybody carrier qualified. The advanced *trainer* was
the F6 Hellcat -- the hottest thing the Navy had a few years earlier -- and in
which the single engine students all carrier qualified.

People really don't change, but selection and training procedures surely do --
as they should. Technology is dandy: selection and training are what counts.

Quent
  #2  
Old July 14th 03, 06:41 AM
QDurham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

...but after Pearl was hit the US military couldn't wait for everybody to go
out and get 2 years of college. CTD was used instead. And by the results, it
worked just fine.

Absolutely. Ask my two of my brothers-in-law. Inefficient, but worked!

Quent
  #3  
Old July 14th 03, 11:51 AM
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

QDurham wrote:

...but after Pearl was hit the US military couldn't wait for everybody to go

out and get 2 years of college. CTD was used instead. And by the results, it
worked just fine.

Absolutely. Ask my two of my brothers-in-law. Inefficient, but worked!


"CTD"? "Connect the dots"? Help out the laity here, guys.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
  #5  
Old July 14th 03, 04:07 PM
Gooneybird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message
...
QDurham wrote:

...but after Pearl was hit the US military couldn't wait for everybody to

go
out and get 2 years of college. CTD was used instead. And by the results, it
worked just fine.

Absolutely. Ask my two of my brothers-in-law. Inefficient, but worked!


"CTD"? "Connect the dots"? Help out the laity here, guys.


You betcha. College Training Detachment. OK?

George Z.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
FA: Jeppesen Private Pilot Training kit Andy Aviation Marketplace 0 October 18th 04 04:30 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
FA: Cessna Private Pilot and Instrument Pilot Complete Training Kits Wei-En Tan Aviation Marketplace 1 May 30th 04 07:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.