If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On Nov 2, 1:05*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 11/2/2010 12:52 PM, Grider Pirate wrote: I don't have FLARM, but I have a TT21 transponder. I WILL be talking on 123.5 on the Whites! Let me get this straight. *FLARM uses GPS altitude. My transponder uses Pressure altitude. FLARM will see my transponder (assuming I'm interrogated) much as a PCAS. FLARM will look at its GPS altitude, and maybe not worry about me because it thinks we have 1000' vertical separation. *Too bad for us if it's a smokin' day, and the tranponder pressure altitude show 16,800 when the GPS altitude shows 18,000! B2016373615714N11540384WA *05179 *05561 *000076000000 B2016413615718N11540296WA *05202 *05585 *000072000000 (just an example of a 1,256 difference between pressure and GPS alt, spaces added for clarity) The difference between cabin and static is trivial compared to the difference between pressure and GPS. Also, we just learned that the altitude of other gliders displayed by SeeYou for Flarm purposes is absolute, not relative. *So we will be comparing the GPS altitude of other gliders with the pressure altitude on our altimeter. *This seems like a problem.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My understanding from Urs's talk is that Flarm is using pressure altitude, not GPS altitude. It does not make sense otherwise as other pointed out. While GPS altitude is more accurate as an absolute altitude (if you took a tape measure), the actual difference between GPS altitude and pressure altitude can indeed be over 1000 feet, and the accuracy of gps altitude relies heavily on reception and can jitter a lot. Since all we need to know is relative altitude to another aircraft carrying a flarm or transponder, pressure altitude makes much more sense to me. Did I miss something? Ramy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On Nov 2, 12:52*pm, Grider Pirate wrote:
On Nov 2, 11:20*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: [snip] I don't have FLARM, but I have a TT21 transponder. I WILL be talking on 123.5 on the Whites! Let me get this straight. *FLARM uses GPS altitude. My transponder uses Pressure altitude. FLARM will see my transponder (assuming I'm interrogated) much as a PCAS. FLARM will look at its GPS altitude, and maybe not worry about me because it thinks we have 1000' vertical separation. *Too bad for us if it's a smokin' day, and the tranponder pressure altitude show 16,800 when the GPS altitude shows 18,000! B2016373615714N11540384WA *05179 *05561 *000076000000 B2016413615718N11540296WA *05202 *05585 *000072000000 (just an example of a 1,256 difference between pressure and GPS alt, spaces added for clarity) The difference between cabin and static is trivial compared to the difference between pressure and GPS. James Thanks for using a transponder! You are asking a different question than I was talking about. flarm- flarm collision avoidance radio links uses GPS altitude and does not involve pressure. I did not say th PowerFLARM does not use pressure information elsewhere. PCAS systems today can suffer from altitide errors (esp if the PCAS eqiupped glider does not have a local transponder to pick up an accurate altitude). PCAS systems sniff the local transponder altitude or use ambient cockpit pressure to sense their relative altitude to a threat and I assume PowerFLARM will do similar. What exactly the PCAS does I am not sure, then there are parts of the Zaon MRX that I don't understand either. And I'm not losing any sleep over it given how obviously the difference between encoder altitude and GPS altitude can be (so pressure data is needed) and from conversation with these guys over related issues where they clearly are smarter than your average bear on this stuff. I know you know this but the PCAS warning from a PowerFLARM or Zaon MRX on the White Mountains to your Trig TT-21 will be a lot less useful that the flarm-flarm link between two PowerFLARM units. I've flown the whites with PCAS (and a Mode C) and on busy days you get too many alerts with too little time to work out where the threat is. On quiet days it is handy for letting you know somebody else is in the area. If you have a Trig TT21 in an experimental glider today you may want to consider connecting a GPS and transmitting 1090ES data-out in future. And before anybody asks - ADS-B data-out systems are required to transmit GPS altitude _and_ pressure altitude. Darryl |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On 11/2/2010 1:28 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
You are asking a different question than I was talking about. flarm- flarm collision avoidance radio links uses GPS altitude and does not involve pressure. I did not say th PowerFLARM does not use pressure information elsewhere. So PowerFLARM uses GPS altitude to avoid collisions, but also broadcasts pressure altitude, and this is what shows up on the SeeYou screen next to other gliders? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On Nov 2, 1:39*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 11/2/2010 1:28 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote: You are asking a different question than I was talking about. flarm- flarm collision avoidance radio links uses GPS altitude and does not involve pressure. I did not say th PowerFLARM does not use pressure information elsewhere. So PowerFLARM uses GPS altitude to avoid collisions, but also broadcasts pressure altitude, and this is what shows up on the SeeYou screen next to other gliders? I was saying PowerFLARM is a PCAS *receiver* it just needs to know the pressure altitude for that to work - it does not transmit anything. Same for ADS-B since it is only a receiver. Flarm and PowerFLARM have to be 100% compatible and Flarm does not use pressure altitude in its collision avoidance protocol. And I want to qualify that as far as I know PowerFLARM does not transmit pressure altitude, but it might, I dont know. And if anybody ever wanted to use that it might break things so I'm not sure it would ever be a good idea. See my other post in this thread on how SeeYou Mobile does what it does which I think will address these concerns. Darryl Darryl |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On 11/2/2010 2:02 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Flarm and PowerFLARM have to be 100% compatible and Flarm does not use pressure altitude in its collision avoidance protocol. And I want to qualify that as far as I know PowerFLARM does not transmit pressure altitude, but it might, I dont know. It must transmit pressure altitude, as otherwise the altitude reading displaying on SeeYou next to another glider is GPS altitude. I can't compare that to the altitude on my altimeter. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On Nov 2, 1:05*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 11/2/2010 12:52 PM, Grider Pirate wrote: I don't have FLARM, but I have a TT21 transponder. I WILL be talking on 123.5 on the Whites! Let me get this straight. *FLARM uses GPS altitude. My transponder uses Pressure altitude. FLARM will see my transponder (assuming I'm interrogated) much as a PCAS. FLARM will look at its GPS altitude, and maybe not worry about me because it thinks we have 1000' vertical separation. *Too bad for us if it's a smokin' day, and the tranponder pressure altitude show 16,800 when the GPS altitude shows 18,000! B2016373615714N11540384WA *05179 *05561 *000076000000 B2016413615718N11540296WA *05202 *05585 *000072000000 (just an example of a 1,256 difference between pressure and GPS alt, spaces added for clarity) The difference between cabin and static is trivial compared to the difference between pressure and GPS. Also, we just learned that the altitude of other gliders displayed by SeeYou for Flarm purposes is absolute, not relative. *So we will be comparing the GPS altitude of other gliders with the pressure altitude on our altimeter. *This seems like a problem. Having never flown with SeeYou Mobile and Flarm I'll admit to not being sure exactly what is shows for altitude on the Flarm radar screen. But that does not stop some reverse engineering... Some other Flarm 3rd party display products only show relative height. But lets assume SeeYou Mobile shows absolute altitude not differences. But that does *not* automatically mean it is showing pressure altitude (corrected for QNH) or GPS altitude of those other gliders? The altitude data presented to SeeYou Mobile or any other application that connects to a Flarm is only ever *relative* altitude between the remote gliders flarm GPS and your flarm's GPS. The dataport interface document is on Flarm's web site and is great quick bedtime read. SeeYou Mobile would have to add your GPS altitude to the difference to get the absolute GPS altitude of the other glider. Now if SeeYou Mobile knows your pressure altitude I would hope it works with that and all the other Flarm targets are show with pressure altitudes. That would be consistent with the general handling of altitudes in SeeYou Moble but I'll let Andrej or others confirm what they do. BTW anybody else got an idea that Flarm folks working on this know what they are doing? :-) And to be clear to others in case they are worried about the absolute altitude description - when you get a pop-up Flarm alert in SeeYou Mobile the altitude displayed is always relative. The Flarm "radar" display also has user settable color bands to show it the other aircraft are near, above or below your altitude. You know for a large map/radar display I'd personally rather see absolute altitudes - especially as we eventually forward to ADS-B and may see people over hundreds of miles. Ultimately having a choice of relative/absolute would be best. Now somebody tell us that SeeYou Mobile shows relative altitudes now and we can all go back to sleep :-) Darryl |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On Nov 2, 2:15*pm, Greg Arnold wrote:
On 11/2/2010 2:02 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote: Flarm and PowerFLARM have to be 100% compatible and Flarm does not use pressure altitude in its collision avoidance protocol. And I want to qualify that as far as I know PowerFLARM does not transmit pressure altitude, but it might, I dont know. It must transmit pressure altitude, as otherwise the altitude reading displaying on SeeYou next to another glider is GPS altitude. *I can't compare that to the altitude on my altimeter. Greg, O ye, of little faith. Wanna bet a case of good San Ynetz area wine? Darryl |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On 11/2/2010 2:25 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
You know for a large map/radar display I'd personally rather see absolute altitudes - especially as we eventually forward to ADS-B and may see people over hundreds of miles. Ultimately having a choice of relative/absolute would be best. Now somebody tell us that SeeYou Mobile shows relative altitudes now and we can all go back to sleep :-) This morning Andrej told us it is absolute. Darryl |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
PowerFLARM questions
On 11/2/2010 2:29 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:15 pm, Greg wrote: On 11/2/2010 2:02 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote: Flarm and PowerFLARM have to be 100% compatible and Flarm does not use pressure altitude in its collision avoidance protocol. And I want to qualify that as far as I know PowerFLARM does not transmit pressure altitude, but it might, I dont know. It must transmit pressure altitude, as otherwise the altitude reading displaying on SeeYou next to another glider is GPS altitude. I can't compare that to the altitude on my altimeter. Greg, O ye, of little faith. Wanna bet a case of good San Ynetz area wine? Darryl No, I will decline that bet. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, I think. It will record it.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFLARM Mode S question | kirk.stant | Soaring | 54 | October 26th 10 02:51 PM |
PowerFLARM Portable mount option | DaleKramer | Soaring | 11 | October 20th 10 03:45 PM |
Build your own PowerFLARM! | Darryl Ramm | Soaring | 51 | August 19th 10 06:39 PM |
Mig-29 questions & general aviation questions 2003 | Steven | Military Aviation | 1 | October 20th 03 06:06 AM |
Seven Questions For Michael Moore from a Blogger (was Questions for Mr. Bush, from Michael Moore) | Jim Yanik | Military Aviation | 2 | October 9th 03 09:36 PM |