A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Pentagon axes development of Comanche helicopter"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 04, 07:11 PM
Dave Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The tail rotor is tilted to the side. Therefore it has a slight vertical
component to its thrust.

Perhaps, the tilt was a tentative step by Sikorsky toward having both rotors
face upward, and both contributing to lift.

The world's first production helicopters had two main rotors.
(http://www.unicopter.com/0474.html &
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/focke_drache-r.html). IMHO, rotorcraft
configurations will move away from the tail rotor and back to where they
should have been all along.


Peter Seddon" wrote in message
And what are the main engines rated at then? I am intrigued as I had
expected the tail to take no more than 10% of total power.




  #2  
Old February 27th 04, 05:15 AM
Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The reason for the high Hp rating on the Fantail is the sideward flight
capability - 80 knots.

Dan Hollenbaugh
Comanche Test Engineer

Dave Jackson wrote in message ...
The tail rotor is tilted to the side. Therefore it has a slight vertical
component to its thrust.

Perhaps, the tilt was a tentative step by Sikorsky toward having both

rotors
face upward, and both contributing to lift.

The world's first production helicopters had two main rotors.
(http://www.unicopter.com/0474.html &
http://avia.russian.ee/vertigo/focke_drache-r.html). IMHO, rotorcraft
configurations will move away from the tail rotor and back to where they
should have been all along.


Peter Seddon" wrote in message
And what are the main engines rated at then? I am intrigued as I had
expected the tail to take no more than 10% of total power.






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentagon Reviews Health of Helicopter Industrial Base Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 August 22nd 04 07:23 AM
Commanche alternatives? John Cook Military Aviation 99 March 24th 04 03:22 AM
Commanche alternatives? Kevin Brooks Naval Aviation 23 March 24th 04 03:22 AM
Army ends 20-year helicopter program Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 12 February 27th 04 07:48 PM
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 Larry Dighera Military Aviation 0 November 19th 03 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.