If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Greg Hennessy wrote: On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:09:36 -0000, "Keith Willshaw" wrote: Hiroshima was the cheif naval port of the Empire. It played much the same role as Portsmouth , Kiel or San Diego. There were few of its adult inhabitants who were not working directly or indirectly for the military industrial complex. Additionally it was a major army centre where troops were being trained for the expected invasion. Several divisions worth. Of course our friend cannott explain why something allegedly targetted at only civilians was also timed to and did in fact take out these forces. As for Nagasaki it was a major industrial centre , specifically Mitsubishi had a major aircraft plant there that doubtless made many of the aircraft that bombed Chinese cities. Keith Thanks for saving me the trouble Keith, cue yet more revisionist anti americanism from our friend here. greg -- Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland. I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan. You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide. How many on the group have no use at all for revisionists? I had to read some of their junk as a grad student taking a Historigraphy course, and I had no use for them at all: They were Pearl Harbor revisionists, but the POV's the same. I read them, quoted them in a paper, and once the course was done, had no more sue for them whatsoever in any way,shape, or form. Still don't. Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|