A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old December 21st 03, 01:17 PM
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Greg Hennessy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:09:36 -0000, "Keith Willshaw"
wrote:



Hiroshima was the cheif naval port of the Empire.

It played much the
same role as Portsmouth , Kiel or San Diego.

There were few
of its adult inhabitants who were not working

directly or indirectly
for the military industrial complex. Additionally

it was a major army
centre where troops were being trained for

the expected invasion.

Several divisions worth. Of course our friend
cannott explain why something
allegedly targetted at only civilians was also
timed to and did in fact
take out these forces.


As for Nagasaki it was a major industrial centre

, specifically
Mitsubishi had a major aircraft plant there

that doubtless made many
of the aircraft that bombed Chinese cities.

Keith



Thanks for saving me the trouble Keith, cue
yet more revisionist anti
americanism from our friend here.



greg


--
Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new
thyroid gland.
I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart
as Charlie Chan.
You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back
and open wide.

How many on the group have no use at all for revisionists? I had to read
some of their junk as a grad student taking a Historigraphy course, and I
had no use for them at all: They were Pearl Harbor revisionists, but the
POV's the same. I read them, quoted them in a paper, and once the course
was done, had no more sue for them whatsoever in any way,shape, or form.
Still don't.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.