New season, new procedures

On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:07:48 -0500, MarkIV wrote:

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:24:56 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Mark IV wrote:
On Dec 3, 11:54*am, wrote:
Mark IV got the latest AOPA ePilot Flight
Traini
ng:

Then regurgitated it here as though he wrote it.

"Stephen W.Ells advised", "Alton K.Marsh said".

Anything else you'd like rubbed in your face?

Those aren't attributions, and would not in any case justify the lack of
attribution in the "Final exam question of the day" portion.

There didn't seem to be any point in your original post, other than
posturing by stealing the text written by others and making it appear as
your own.

I like you, Jim. I like this newsgroup. A lot of people
like me here too and there is nothing you can do to
make people stop liking me.

http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze

Mark IV

You have a point there, Mark(ie)...too bad it sits prominently on your
head.

*lol*
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

On Dec 3, 2:24*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark IV wrote:
On Dec 3, 11:54 am, wrote:
Mark IV got the latest AOPA ePilot Flight
Traini
ng:

Then regurgitated it here as though he wrote it.

"Stephen W.Ells advised", "Alton K.Marsh said".

Anything else you'd like rubbed in your face?

Those aren't attributions, and would not in any case justify the lack of
attribution in the "Final exam question of the day" portion.

There didn't seem to be any point in your original post, other than
posturing by stealing the text written by others and making it appear as
your own.

You are both incorrect as per established standards
or literacy and writing. The quotation marks (yeah,
those little tick marks I MADE SURE WERE THERE,
are sufficient to convey that the information is imported
from a third source. That is writing 101.

Now, we have
1. The displayance of quotation marks
2. The author's names who wrote it.
3. The internet link to it which is available
to me, would only link back to my e mail,
not where it originates.

So, if you guy must insist in bitching today, I
suggest you do so with your husbands. Others
may simply take the information and use it for
aviation. It's not like there's an overwhelming load
of it being posted here anyway.

---
Mark IV

Mark IV wrote:
1. The displayance of quotation marks

None appear around the "Final exam question of the day".

2. The author's names who wrote it.

Missing the attribution to AOPA. Even the subject line is a rip-off.

3. The internet link to it which is available
to me, would only link back to my e mail,
not where it originates.

If you had prefaced your post with something like "Here are some useful
tips from an AOPA ePilot Training Tip e-mail" you wouldn't now have to be
defending your posting. If you had actually followed some of the links in
that e-mail you would have found valid internet links where readers could
find the full text.

Others
may simply take the information and use it for
aviation.

Anyone interested could join AOPA and get those e-mails. (I get them.) You
are not adding any value.

It's not like there's an overwhelming load
of it being posted here anyway.

You've copied at least one post of mine in a way that made it appear as
your own, so don't go using that excuse to ride on the efforts of others.

On Dec 3, 7:24*am, Mark IV wrote:
“Warm up the engine at 1,000 to 1,200 rpm unless it’s necessary to
reduce rpm to keep from exceeding the oil pressure redline. As the oil
warms up, the rpm can be increased. Allow plenty of time for the
engine to warm up,” Steven W. Ells advised "

“The system, although simple, does have one major downside. In most
light aircraft installations, because the residual heat from the
exhaust is what powers the cabin heater, a leak in the exhaust system
could mean exhaust coming into the cockpit. And that means carbon
monoxide could be entering as well. Carbon monoxide is an odorless,
colorless gas that can incapacitate pilots and passengers,” Alton K.
Marsh said

---
Final exam question of the day:

Question: What is the difference between best rate of climb speed and
best angle of climb speed?

Answer: The best rate of climb speed, also known as VY, provides the
greatest gain in altitude in the least amount of time. The best angle
of climb speed (also known as VX) provides the greatest gain in
altitude over a given horizontal distance. The different airspeeds
that either limit or result in specific aircraft performance are known
as “V speeds”—V for velocity. The different V-speed abbreviations are
listed in the federal aviation regulations under Part 1: Definitions
and Abbreviations.

---
Mark IV
Koreans have recently brought out their own vegetarian version of an
instant noodle snack. It’s called Not Poodle.

So you're on the runway accelerating: With no significant crosswind,
if it's a short runway this pilot tends to keep the airplane on the
surface to Vx, then applies back pressure to keep it there until clear
of the threat.

If there's a serious crosswind I keep the wheels on the ground until
I'm sure there's plenty of airspeed, then take it off firmly. By the
way, on a wide runway with a lot of crosswind component start your run
not on the centerline but more to the downwind edge of the runway,
when you're within 10 kts or so of takeoff speed you can take some of
the crosswind component away by turning toward the upwind edge of the
runway. 100 feet of useful runway width (say on one whose paved width
is 150 feet) can really change the relative angle of the wind.

On a longer runway back pressure comes on when airspeed reaches bottom
of the yellow, some of it is released when a/s is at Vx. At 50 feet
or so more back pressure comes off, I trim for Vy, then at 500 feet I
trim for cruise climb and when the airspeed is where I want it I bring
the engine back to 25 square.

How do the rest of you guys in complex singles do it?

Mark IV wrote:
On Dec 3, 2:24Â*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark IV wrote:
On Dec 3, 11:54 am, wrote:
Mark IV got the latest AOPA ePilot Flight
Traini
ng:

Then regurgitated it here as though he wrote it.

"Stephen W.Ells advised", "Alton K.Marsh said".

Anything else you'd like rubbed in your face?

Those aren't attributions, and would not in any case justify the lack of
attribution in the "Final exam question of the day" portion.

There didn't seem to be any point in your original post, other than
posturing by stealing the text written by others and making it appear as
your own.

You are both incorrect as per established standards
or literacy and writing. The quotation marks (yeah,
those little tick marks I MADE SURE WERE THERE,
are sufficient to convey that the information is imported
from a third source. That is writing 101.

Wrong yet again.

Writing 101 says you state the source.

Here is an example that may be simple enough for you to understand.

According to So And So:

"quouted text"


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Ari Silverstein wrote:
You have a point there, Mark(ie)...too bad it sits prominently on your
head.

Responding to Mark's moronic shadow has always shown you for the dolt that
you are. You, he, and his shadow, are well matched in intellect, maturity,
and personality.

On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:27:45 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Ari Silverstein wrote:
You have a point there, Mark(ie)...too bad it sits prominently on your
head.

Responding to Mark's moronic shadow has always shown you for the dolt that
you are. You, he, and his shadow, are well matched in intellect, maturity,
and personality.

Feel free to go **** yourself, you self-righteous assclown.
--
A fireside chat not with Ari!
http://tr.im/holj
Motto: Live To Spooge It!

On Dec 3, 2:56*pm, wrote:
Bug Dout wrote:
Mark IV writes:

Question: What is the difference between best rate of climb speed and
best angle of climb speed?

Answer: The best rate of climb speed, also known as VY, provides the
greatest gain in altitude in the least amount of time. The best angle
of climb speed (also known as VX) provides the greatest gain in
altitude over a given horizontal distance.

Quibble: I would change the first to:

The best rate of climb speed, also known as VY, provides the
greatest gain in altitude in a unit time (or given time).

You need to quibble with the ePilot flight training edition which is where
the quote, unattributed of course, came from.

It didn't attribution. It's from the public domaine.

Had he bothered to quote the entire passage, there would have been a
reference to a link that gave expanded information.

And the copied link wouldn't have worked, resulting
in a broken like. So I didn't.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Dec 3, 4:57*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Mark IV wrote:
*1. The displayance of quotation marks

None appear around the "Final exam question of the day".

Yes that's true. I'm so horrible.

*2. The author's names who wrote it.

Missing the attribution to AOPA. Even the subject line is a rip-off.

Yes, that's true. Suicide?

*3. The internet link to it which is available
* * *to me, would only link back to my e mail,
* * *not where it originates.

If you had prefaced your post with something like "Here are some useful
tips from an AOPA ePilot Training Tip e-mail" you wouldn't now have to be
defending your posting. If you had actually followed some of the links in
that e-mail you would have found valid internet links where readers could
find the full text.

If people here didn't **** and moan so much,
then maybe I'd have taken the time to do that.


Others
may simply take the information and use it for
aviation.

Anyone interested could join AOPA and get those e-mails. (I get them.) You
are not adding any value.

Or...someone just browsing through usenet might
actually see an aviation related post, and be glad
I bothered to put something here on topic.


It's not like there's an overwhelming load
of it being posted here anyway.

You've copied at least one post of mine in a way that made it appear as
your own, so don't go using that excuse to ride on the efforts of others.

Yes, and upon examination of that event, it
was both revealed and explanined that not only
was I not plagerizing you...in reality, it was a
compliment to you. Subsequent to that, the same
information came up again, and I went out of my
way to be sure you were given credit.

Quotation marks denote importation from another
source. Giving the authors name attributes who
wrote it. Providing a link...is an internet thing. Yes,
it's a courtesy, but that's the poster's choice. It
isn't a literature violation to omit it, because of
a little thing we call...search engines.

---
Mark IV

On Dec 3, 5:27*pm, Jim Logajan wrote:
Ari Silverstein wrote:
You have a point there, Mark(ie)...too bad it sits prominently on your
head.

Responding to Mark's moronic shadow has always shown you for the dolt that
you are. You, he, and his shadow, are well matched in intellect, maturity,
and personality.

Jim, he *is the sockpuppet shadow*.

Haven't you ever read this?
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Arch.../msg00204.html

I don't write nonsense.

---
Mark IV