If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Congrads, Gatt PDX can be a real pain in the rear. I listen to them all the
time on the scanner its like they hate GA aircraft. "gatt" wrote in message ... When the weather is bad and the examiner gives you the option of delaying for better weather, don't say "Well, if I can't pass my checkride in IMC I'm probably not qualified for the IFR rating." First attempt at the checkride. Icing forecast at 6,000. Examiner said "No problem. We probably won't go much above four." The FIRST instruction I got from Portland Approach was to hold over Battleground...at 6,000. Lots of flying around in turbulence trying to maintain heading and altitude, listening to PDX warn people about the weather. Later, holding in IMC, was told it was 2003Z and to expect my next clearance at 2030Z. Wonderful. So I held in IMC for about 20 minutes while the examiner tracked my course on his handheld GPS. I'm not sure how I passed. He spent the first half hour of the oral telling me about how failure works, and not to be embarrassed by it, etc. I'm not in fact sure how I made it through the checkride without just saying "This sucks. I'm going home." I made more mistakes and flew sloppier than any training flight I've done in the last month. So I had already started guessing which parts I passed and which I busted, and TWO HOURS after we landed--he having asked questions like "So, how do YOU think you did?"--he pulled out a booklet (me: 'here comes the dreaded pink slip'), asked for my logbook and then wrote my temporary endorsement. I couldn't believe my eyes. Wasn't a gold-medal performance, but he said I stayed cool in the IMC and that must have been my saving grace. Went home and discovered my wife had poured a shot of whiskey for me. Mission accomplished! -gatt Portland, OR |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:00:44 GMT, john smith wrote in
:: Never let ATC put you somewhere you don't want to be. Sometimes you have to assert yourself, but know the rules and protect yourself at all times. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:00:44 GMT, john smith wrote in
:: Never let ATC put you somewhere you don't want to be. Sometimes you have to assert yourself, but know the rules and protect yourself at all times. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
My understanding is, if you do something and he doesn't tell you you
busted it, then you passed it. You have to be told when you bust something, then the option is yours if you want to continue to check other things off or not. gatt wrote: So I had already started guessing which parts I passed and which I busted -gatt Portland, OR |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
My understanding is, if you do something and he doesn't tell you you
busted it, then you passed it. You have to be told when you bust something, then the option is yours if you want to continue to check other things off or not. gatt wrote: So I had already started guessing which parts I passed and which I busted -gatt Portland, OR |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
gatt wrote:
When the weather is bad and the examiner gives you the option of delaying for better weather, don't say "Well, if I can't pass my checkride in IMC I'm probably not qualified for the IFR rating." First attempt at the checkride. Icing forecast at 6,000. Examiner said "No problem. We probably won't go much above four." The FIRST instruction I got from Portland Approach was to hold over Battleground...at 6,000. Lots of flying around in turbulence trying to maintain heading and altitude, listening to PDX warn people about the weather. That's pretty cool. I've never heard of an examiner who would fly a check ride in actual. Matt |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
gatt wrote:
When the weather is bad and the examiner gives you the option of delaying for better weather, don't say "Well, if I can't pass my checkride in IMC I'm probably not qualified for the IFR rating." First attempt at the checkride. Icing forecast at 6,000. Examiner said "No problem. We probably won't go much above four." The FIRST instruction I got from Portland Approach was to hold over Battleground...at 6,000. Lots of flying around in turbulence trying to maintain heading and altitude, listening to PDX warn people about the weather. That's pretty cool. I've never heard of an examiner who would fly a check ride in actual. Matt |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
When I did the VOR hold during my checkride, the west side of the VOR
was in the sun, the east side was in IMC. BTIZ wrote: not many examiners I know of would go up in real IFR for a checkride with someone they did not know... good job.. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
When I did the VOR hold during my checkride, the west side of the VOR
was in the sun, the east side was in IMC. BTIZ wrote: not many examiners I know of would go up in real IFR for a checkride with someone they did not know... good job.. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Good for you.
"gatt" wrote in message ... When the weather is bad and the examiner gives you the option of delaying for better weather, don't say "Well, if I can't pass my checkride in IMC I'm probably not qualified for the IFR rating." First attempt at the checkride. Icing forecast at 6,000. Examiner said "No problem. We probably won't go much above four." The FIRST instruction I got from Portland Approach was to hold over Battleground...at 6,000. Lots of flying around in turbulence trying to maintain heading and altitude, listening to PDX warn people about the weather. Later, holding in IMC, was told it was 2003Z and to expect my next clearance at 2030Z. Wonderful. So I held in IMC for about 20 minutes while the examiner tracked my course on his handheld GPS. I'm not sure how I passed. He spent the first half hour of the oral telling me about how failure works, and not to be embarrassed by it, etc. I'm not in fact sure how I made it through the checkride without just saying "This sucks. I'm going home." I made more mistakes and flew sloppier than any training flight I've done in the last month. So I had already started guessing which parts I passed and which I busted, and TWO HOURS after we landed--he having asked questions like "So, how do YOU think you did?"--he pulled out a booklet (me: 'here comes the dreaded pink slip'), asked for my logbook and then wrote my temporary endorsement. I couldn't believe my eyes. Wasn't a gold-medal performance, but he said I stayed cool in the IMC and that must have been my saving grace. Went home and discovered my wife had poured a shot of whiskey for me. Mission accomplished! -gatt Portland, OR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Checkride - Passed, but the bubble did burst a bit | Matt Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | November 7th 04 03:57 AM |
IFR checkride in IMC: PASSED! | gatt | Instrument Flight Rules | 25 | November 3rd 04 12:24 AM |
12/17/03 - This date in history - Passed my PPL checkride | Gerald Sylvester | Piloting | 0 | December 18th 03 04:54 AM |