If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Ah, chemistry; I never did that either. Shoulda tried Wikipedia first; was
sure it was some sort of shortened up slang. Thanks. At 15:13 16 March 2009, Bruce wrote: monomer Dimer Trimer .... Nyal Williams wrote: I know this is not alt.usage.english, but what is the etymology of this word? Is it slang? Jargon? Engineer language? Is it Di-mer or Dim-er or dimer... something or other? I'm just a poor musicologist trying to figure stuff out. At 14:27 16 March 2009, Bruce wrote: Sorry Nyal - excessive vocab use. Dimer == related pair of. In this case two vortices - one off each wingtip that interact to create a roughly symmetrical "geared disk" shape behind the wing. With the downward part of the vortex from each wingtip merging with the downward flow from the other. If you drive behind a (modern / streamlined not SUV) car in the rain or snow you can see the dimer it creates. Formula one and Nascar rear wings also create impressive examples... Nyal Williams wrote: Help; what is "dimer" ? At 14:09 15 March 2009, Bruce wrote: Paul There is a large scale vortex dimer operating behind any aircraft, and particularly behind high wing loading, heavy short winged things like Pawnees. The wake we fly above in high tow is the turbulent propeller wake, but we would have to be impossibly high and/or far back to avoid the downward moving centre section of the dimer. I saw a picture using smoke trails that demonstrates the scale and power of this some years back - http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud...ry/Vortex.html There is a more impressive video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy0hgG2pkUs&NR=1 So - given that you are flying in a field of air that has a significant downward component, maybe you do have a higher angle of attack on the wings. Bottom line is that even in the smooth air above the propwash you are still in air affected by the tug. Bruce sisu1a wrote: Agreed. My money is on the towplane wake. I put my monies on the elevator authority/AoA ratio. We fly above the wing wake (USA...) in most cases, in relatively clean air, but sometimes in the clean air below it. Box the wake, it will tell you where it is and where it isn't... But typically glider's noses, on tow, are unnaturally high (and thus AoA is higher...) for a given airspeed, in addition to being more forcefully held there, both effects of course due to the rope's pull. The elevator is the same size whether on tow or free flight though, so the authority it can exert against the countering forces is proportionately lower than in free flight... The fix is the same regardless of why though- more speed... please! (wings rocking in vain...) -Paul |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
This theory certainly explains the poor aileron control or wallowing at
slow towing speeds, even though it seems the wing, (on average) is no where near the stall angle of attack. I have seen guys try to fly model planes with wash in instead of wash out in the wings. Doesn't work too well! Cookie At 15:33 16 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: On 16 Mar, 13:00, Derek Copeland wrote: ... but the K13 definitely starts 'wallowing' below about 52knots, whereas its normal free flight stalling speed is about 36knots. OK, here's my latest theory. Gliders have bigger wingspans than tugs. Therefore the outer bit of each glider wing is in the upwards moving bit of the tug's tip vortices, and the centre bit is in the downwards going bit. Effective result: much higher angle of attack at the tips, particularly since the nose has to come up to maintain AoA at the centre. Hence wash-in, tips near stall, downgoing aileron actually stalling, reduced control effectiveness, wallowing. Questions: does it happen as much out to one side hen boxing the wake? Does it happen when the tug - a motorglider - has the same span as the tug? Ian |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Agree with Ian,
I thought we agreed that the force of the tow rope acts at whatever angle the rope meets the glider. This means it is a factor the RELATIVE position of the glider to the towplane, NOT the direction of flight. That being said, I once was at an airshow where Oscar Bosch was towed by the famous plane called "Sampson". Sampson held all kinds of "time to climb" records. Old Oscar never really caught up with Sampson, and was in the lowest low tow I think I have ever seen. There was plenty of up thrust on that tow rope! Cookie At 15:29 16 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: On 16 Mar, 13:28, " wrote: On Mar 14, 8:43=A0am, The Real Doctor wrote: Bad example, since tow planes pull - give or take a wee bit - horizontally, regardless of climb angle. Never been towed behind an Ag-cat, have you? 265 horse Pawnee count? Nothing horizontal about that evolution! Tug wheels on the horizon, glider just above the prop wash, just like everything else. Ian |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
On Mar 16, 9:33*am, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 16 Mar, 13:00, Derek Copeland wrote: ... but the K13 definitely starts 'wallowing' below about 52knots, whereas its normal free flight stalling speed is about 36knots. OK, here's my latest theory. Gliders have bigger wingspans than tugs. Therefore the outer bit of each glider wing is in the upwards moving bit of the tug's tip vortices, and the centre bit is in the downwards going bit. Effective result: much higher angle of attack at the tips, particularly since the nose has to come up to maintain AoA at the centre. Hence wash-in, tips near stall, downgoing aileron actually stalling, reduced control effectiveness, wallowing. Questions: does it happen as much out to one side hen boxing the wake? Does it happen when the tug - a motorglider - has the same span as the tug? Ian I fly a 20 meter glider that sometimes is loaded with 60 gallons of water and I have to say that I've not noticed this effect when towing behind either a Pawnee or a Cub. Aileron control on tow is no worse than in free flight. The slower Cub is easier to follow if anything. Over the years, I've been towed by everything from a 85HP 7AC champ to a 400HP Pawnee Brave. It's all pretty much the same - just follow the tug. What I have noticed is that a glider in high tow will tend to drift laterally toward the center which is generally a good thing. I haven't noticed any of the pitch related stuff people are talking about. On one occasion a pilot was complaining that his glider needed more than 80 knots on tow to feel "right". I flew the glider and radioed the tow pilot to reduce towing speed until he started complaining about control authority but I saw no problems with this glider. The only thing I could point to was the pilots tendency to over control his glider and to use positive flap "to see the tow plane better". I suspect the excess flap was limiting aileron authority. He would have been better off with some cushions. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
On 16 Mar, 16:41, danlj wrote:
Ten - twelve years ago we had a little 4-man club that towed a fully- loaded Blanik L-13 off a *paved* runway with a Piper Pacer. I was once approaching my then club - Borders GC - to land when I saw a Bocian lining up for takeoff behind the club's Pawnee 150. "Oh, this should be interesting" I thought and I found a bit of lift to park in and watch the fun. The fun turned out to be the combination making three full circuits of the airfield, never getting above a couple of hundred feet, then the tug waving off and the two landing together (no on-tow landings in the UK, unlike France). Nice wee tug for a single seater, and whisper quiet with a four blade prop and silencer, but it couldn't pull the skin off a two-seater rice pudding. It later had the engine upped to 160hp (as far as the CAA would go without an STC), a 2-blade prop and lost the silencer. Ian |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On 16 Mar, 17:08, sisu1a wrote:
This thread is interesting and I thought it deserved a new title, even though I have nothing to really add to it at this point (except that rudder effectiveness is also reduced with a tethered nose...) Thanks! I'm finding this interesting too. I might have to tuft a wing and go towing later this year. PS. the rope's tugging of the nose is quite severe at the outside positions while boxing the wake, and greatly affects control authority (especially in draggy fat ships with ineffective controls like a 2-33...), so the experiment you propose might not yield as much insight as we'd like. Good point. It's a lot easier with a belly hook and I think AN-2s can tow off the interplane struts, which would give a bit of offset. Unfortunately I don't know anyone with an AN-2 ... Ian |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
I ran a quick calculation of the expected catenary sag in a towrope.
With a 200-foot nylon/poly towrope and 75 pounds of tension, the sag amounts to less than a foot, ignoring aerodynamic forces. Under steady towing conditions, it can probably be ignored. Mike |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Mike,
I agree that the sag of the rope is small and can probably be ignored. My calculations do not show drag values as high as 75 lbs however, so the sag may be (a little) more that your calculations. I figure a modern glider will have something in the neighborhood of 30 lbs drag, while an old "boat" of a glider will be in the 50 lb range. (Am I missing something here?) I calculated the sag effect in the rope a different way. I figure a typical 200' poly rope weighs about 4 lbs. The tow plane supports one end, while the glider supports the other. I figured in a 2 lb down force on the glider. Since, during tow, lift is essentially the same as weight, you have to get an extra 2 lbs of lift to compensate for the weight of the rope. If you figure the weight of the glider in the 700 to 900 lb range, it is a tiny percentage of extra lift needed due to the rope. (like 2/10 of one percent.) Same is true if the rope pulls (slightly) upward or downward, the change in lift is tiny. Now consider free flight in a 45 degree bank. Lift is increased by 40%. The glider still will fly pretty well at relatively slow speeds in a 45 degree bank. Now look at 60 degree bank where lift is doubled...... Just a couple more thoughts about the forces on that tow rope: When the tug is flying without a glider, the rope does not hang straight down. The "drag" on the rope causes the rope to fly at quite a flat angle. We could say that some of the weight of the rope is being supported by the air drag on the rope. But then when a glider is on tow, and the rope is essentially level, with a sag, I guess the front half of hte rope is being lifted by air drag, while the back half of the rope is being pushed down by air drag. So I think that just adding the weight of the rope as a downward component will work in calcualtions. Long way to get to the point however. I don't see how the tow rope can be the culprit in this "too slow tow" situation. Cookie At 23:30 16 March 2009, Mike the Strike wrote: I ran a quick calculation of the expected catenary sag in a towrope. With a 200-foot nylon/poly towrope and 75 pounds of tension, the sag amounts to less than a foot, ignoring aerodynamic forces. Under steady towing conditions, it can probably be ignored. Mike |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
I calculated the rope tension as 25 pounds of aerodynamic drag (40:1
for a 1,000 pound glider) and 50 pounds to provide the force necessary for the glider to climb. That's in the right ball park. The tension obviously increases with the rate of climb since you have to impart energy to the glider for it to ascend. Mike |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
I understand that Bill's glider is a Nimbus 2, but don't know which
version. I used to have a share in an early Nimbus 2 with an all flying tailplane and just a belly hook. It was a bit twitchy in pitch, but otherwise very easy to aerotow. I think the reasons for this are that this type has a very large wing area (with a corresponding low stalling speed), and the long wings give plenty of lateral damping. When retrieving from fields, with negative flap selected, the wings would often level themselves in the propwash when the tuggie opened up the throttle, even before the glider started to roll. The little Standard Cirrus I own now is actually much more of a handful on aerotow, particularly if you have to start without a wingtip runner. It normally stalls at just below 40knots in free flight, but doesn't feel comfortable below 60knots on tow. I have noticed that in general, big span gliders seem to be easier to aerotow than little gliders, despite the reduced aileron effectiveness. Maybe this is because the outer part of the wings (where the ailerons are located) are outside most of the slipstream of the usually much smaller span tugs. This might also explain why tows behind motor gliders with bigger wingspans seem to be more difficult, if the tug's slipstream is the main problem. Derek Copeland At 20:45 16 March 2009, bildan wrote: I fly a 20 meter glider that sometimes is loaded with 60 gallons of water and I have to say that I've not noticed this effect when towing behind either a Pawnee or a Cub. Aileron control on tow is no worse than in free flight. The slower Cub is easier to follow if anything. Over the years, I've been towed by everything from a 85HP 7AC champ to a 400HP Pawnee Brave. It's all pretty much the same - just follow the tug. What I have noticed is that a glider in high tow will tend to drift laterally toward the center which is generally a good thing. I haven't noticed any of the pitch related stuff people are talking about. On one occasion a pilot was complaining that his glider needed more than 80 knots on tow to feel "right". I flew the glider and radioed the tow pilot to reduce towing speed until he started complaining about control authority but I saw no problems with this glider. The only thing I could point to was the pilots tendency to over control his glider and to use positive flap "to see the tow plane better". I suspect the excess flap was limiting aileron authority. He would have been better off with some cushions. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking towplanes for Region 9 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 06 12:03 AM |
US:Restricted Towplanes | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 8 | November 5th 04 11:27 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Take-upReels on Towplanes | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 9 | April 21st 04 12:39 AM |
Helicopters and Towplanes | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | September 11th 03 05:21 PM |