If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:44:48 -0700, waremark wrote:
I am interested by the point about the reserve being added to your finish height where your finish height is different from your arrival height at an airfield. How does this work? I don't have 'Finish is 1,000m below start set' as it doesn't normally affect me - if I start above 1,000 m on a flight for which the scoring will be affected that is another adjustment which I make mentally. In the UK the rule does not affect competition scoring but does affect our BGA Ladder. I have never flown with a finish other than at an airfield - is there a way to set the minimum height at a finish ring? I use LK8000 as my main navigation tool. It displays arrival heights as a signed value, which is difference from your configured arrival height. So with 1000 configured as your target arrival height, if it displays +200 its predicting you'll arrive 200 ft above target and if it shows -400 its predicting arrival 400 ft below target. That works for me. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
I'm stuck back in 1986 (87, actually).Â* I set my CNII to arrive at
1,000' AGL over mid field and it never works out for me.Â* I get lower and lower and, as I get nervous, I arrive well above where I want to be. I can set the XCSoar unit to Automatic McCready and it directs scary fast speeds with MC 9.0 or more. So, Evan, precisely how do you read your expected arrival height after setting your safety factor to zero?Â* I'd like to give it a try. On 9/23/2019 8:01 PM, Tango Eight wrote: O It was dumb in 1986 too :-). No one arrival height covers all situations. T8 Of course not but it is still personal a personal preference, no need to be opiniated, there is always more than one way to skin a cat. Try it the other way, you'll see. Happy landings, T8 -- Dan, 5J |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
Now I get it!Â* My glide slope indication is what I'm interested in.
Since I maintain a 1,000' AGL arrival height in my settings, I look at the glide slope indication as, "At what altitude will arrive over the field?".Â* The only difference is, then, with my arrival height I know that, as the glide slope approaches zero, I should arrive over the field at 1,000', which is what I want.Â* If I set zero as my arrival height, I must remember to think that this is the altitude that I'll arrive and then think, "Will I have enough altitude to fly a proper pattern?"Â* Neither method is very difficult, just a matter of preference.Â* On my last flight, from 5 miles out, I said I'd be making a right base entry to the runway whereas the normal pattern is to the left.Â* It was more like a 45 degree base leg. On 9/24/2019 5:32 AM, RR wrote: Steve has mentioned the key here. If you are about to head home, and find yourself saying somthing like the following, "I am 1000 over, my 1000ft reserve" then your reserve is doing you a disservice. It is somewhat of catch 22. You need to be aware of your reserve in case things go south and you fall below it, but the purpose is to keep you from needing to think about it (always have 1000 ft in reserve). The biggest problem is when things go south. If you are close in, you fall below 0, now you need to subtract from your reserve to figure out your true arrival height. If you use somthing other than 1000 ft it gets harder. So right when you most need clear information you are doing mental math. Bad timing to insert a math problem before you need to make a critical decision. Some (in the admiralty), if not most, know how I know this. It has been described as setting your watch ahead so you are not late. I too had flown with a reserve for years, and was worried about switching, but just a few flights and you adjust. And a few more and you realy start to appreciate the fact that you are, for the first time, realy getting the number you want out of your flight computer. How high will I be when I get there... RR Commodore -- Dan, 5J |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
At 14:44 24 September 2019, waremark wrote:
In the UK the rule does not affect competition scoring but do= es affect our BGA Ladder. I have never flown with a finish other than at an= airfield - is there a way to set the minimum height at a finish ring? With LXxxxx, just set the finish ring radius and a "safety height" of 500ft or whatever on the QNH page. The LX will then show the arrival height margin at the ring, not the airfield. 0ft on the LX means you are at the set ring-crossing height. MC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
And then you land out before arriving at the airfield! I cannot understand why people ever set finish rings at a height which isn't sufficient to ensure a comfortable arrival at the airfield.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:30:42 -0700, waremark wrote:
And then you land out before arriving at the airfield! I cannot understand why people ever set finish rings at a height which isn't sufficient to ensure a comfortable arrival at the airfield. Looks reasonable to me: just set a small finish ring, say with a radius equal to the distance from the airfield TP to the high key point for the run being used on that day and ring height to what the destructors like as high key height. That should be pretty close to putting you at the start of what amounts to a text-book approach. I'd try it myself, provided there's another flying day hiding amidst the current rain and wind. However, although LK8000 7.0 allows a finish ring to be specified, it doesn't allow a finish height to be input. I feel a change request coming on.... -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
Now who ever said making the perfect final glide was suppossed to be "comfortable" lol. If it is too comfortable you just left points on the table.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Now who ever said making the perfect final glide was suppossed to be "comfortable" lol. If it is too comfortable you just left points on the table. I would be extremely nervous about making a final glide that would have me doing a straight-in final at max L/D. Under this scenario, if your glide computer is very accurate, half of the time you would be landing short. And anywhere I fly, landing short is not an option. I am with Mike: I don't regard it as a reserve, that IS the altitude that I want to arrive at. My real reserve is the altitude I have over that. Too many times I have seen that reserve evaporate along the way. You may encounter unexpected areas of sink or stronger headwinds than expected. Tom |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
Truth, and a final glide made at max l/d tells me that the guy already screwed up. The perfect final glide is one that gets you home at the proper altitude and at the max speed. He just screwed up on both counts.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Final glide
On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 5:14:29 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Truth, and a final glide made at max l/d tells me that the guy already screwed up. The perfect final glide is one that gets you home at the proper altitude and at the max speed. He just screwed up on both counts. Yeah, RIGHT! How often do you get the "perfect" final glide? You, sir, are the one that's screwed up! Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clarence See....final glide | Gregg Leslie[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | December 27th 12 09:52 PM |
Final glide | ppp1 | Soaring | 8 | January 6th 11 02:21 PM |
Final Glide | Roy Clark, \B6\ | Soaring | 1 | December 23rd 10 04:45 PM |
Stretching the Final Glide | vontresc | Soaring | 25 | December 16th 09 10:50 PM |
Final Glide - JD (US) | Roy Clark, B6 | Soaring | 1 | September 19th 07 07:17 AM |