What Is This?

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:40 -0600, Dan wrote:

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Thanks, Dan but we are doing simply fine without your innocuously
useless input.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:00:17 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:55:31 -0800 (PST), Gordon wrote:

btw, did you both to say thank you to the ten people who attempted to
answer your apparently poorly worded question?

You're an asshole but I feel in the Easter mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar,
an self-exposed idiot, a ****horse and a dickhead.

The second includes only those who have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh out loud at you, and any of the second group who
see that **** of yours and will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Painful. Righteous yet painful.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:40 -0600, Dan wrote:

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Thanks, Dan but we are doing simply fine without your innocuously
useless input.

Here's where I tell you to go **** a duck up the nose.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:02:45 -0500, Dan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:40 -0600, Dan wrote:

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Thanks, Dan but we are doing simply fine without your innocuously
useless input.

Here's where I tell you to go **** a duck up the nose.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

That's pleasant, thanks, will you supply the duck or must I use your
wife? snicker

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:03:39 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:02:45 -0500, Dan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:40 -0600, Dan wrote:

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Thanks, Dan but we are doing simply fine without your innocuously
useless input.

Here's where I tell you to go **** a duck up the nose.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

That's pleasant, thanks, will you supply the duck or must I use your
wife? snicker

Sorry, Cheeky*******, I'm not married to a woman. I have Orval and
he's all the man I need.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired, homosexual and ****ing proud of it

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:05:00 -0500, Dan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:03:39 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:02:45 -0500, Dan wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:40 -0600, Dan wrote:

How about you worded your question poorly? You didn't ask what the
image is. You just gave a series of numbers and asked what the are. You
were told several times. If you had asked what the picture shows you
might have received a better answer.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Thanks, Dan but we are doing simply fine without your innocuously
useless input.

Here's where I tell you to go **** a duck up the nose.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

That's pleasant, thanks, will you supply the duck or must I use your
wife? snicker

Sorry, Cheeky*******, I'm not married to a woman. I have Orval and
he's all the man I need.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired, homosexual and ****ing proud of it

You win. Say "Hi" to Orval's orifices. vomit

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:57:16 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:55:48 -0800 (PST), Gordon wrote:

stupid rabbit hunt anyway -

Uh-oh.

Someone just made a fool out of themselves. larf

Though every time I read a thread like this I cannot help but think of
Gordon as the lonely kid who hates the prom queen for no other reason
than he has no chance of ****ing her.

I'm sorry but it sounds like jealousy from him. And as a member of the
forum - by no means a prolific one - it kind of embarrasses me.

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:10:29 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:57:16 -0500, Sam wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:55:48 -0800 (PST), Gordon wrote:

stupid rabbit hunt anyway -

Uh-oh.

Someone just made a fool out of themselves. larf

Though every time I read a thread like this I cannot help but think of
Gordon as the lonely kid who hates the prom queen for no other reason
than he has no chance of ****ing her.

I'm sorry but it sounds like jealousy from him. And as a member of the
forum - by no means a prolific one - it kind of embarrasses me.

Oh dear..........he seems to have dropped another rung on the ladder
of total ********.

I think Gordon means well, he's bothered by inability to read through
a thread before his hands automatically alight on the keyboard. Next
thing he knows, clickety-clack - and he's done himself in.

Sam wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0500, Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:38:20 -0500, Quaalude
wrote in :

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?

I don't know.

I do and did and I have no idea what that runway markings are. They
appear to be painted, not VOR.

They are standard runway markings that is tenths of the magnetic heading

Approacing the marking 24 you are on rough magnetic heading of 240 deg etc

Keith

Quaalude wrote in news:jj0d0i$3qm$1
@speranza.aioe.org:

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:24:54 -0600, John Szalay wrote:

Quaalude wrote in news:jj099j$p69$1
@speranza.aioe.org:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:59:24 -0500, Quaalude wrote:

32.866436,-114.385992

Yes, thank you I am very aware it is a lat/long. Did anyone actually
search Google Maps/Earth for the view?


Did YOU bother to read the answers ?

I saw at least three that gave the name of the place...

I see you didn't search the lat/long either sigh

Anyone?


yes I did, , thats why I aasked if you even looked at the responses to the
original