If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What we need is a very large increase in the volume of student starts
and completions. I think Sport Pilot is the key to realizing this. Figuring 20-30 hours needed to get someone licensed, you could realistically have people earning a license in about two weeks ab initio. I imagine we will see schools in places like Florida or New Mexico that will offer packages that a busy person could fit into on a vacation. Availability of new, manufactured aircraft at significantly lower cost will make it easier for new pilots to keep flying. This is to my mind an even bigger issue than student starts. It's awful to have someone go through the trouble and expense of earning a PPL and then not use it, but all evidence indicates this happens quite a lot. More people flying means more demand for airports means more people acquainted with recreational flying means more good things for everyone with wings. Then, of all the people who go Sport Pilot, I'll bet we see a minimum of 25% upgrading to PPLs within two years. These will be people who enjoy flying and want to move up to bigger and faster and more capable aircraft. It will be much easier for someone to start as a Sport Pilot, enjoy that for a year or two, then step up to 172s or Cherokees. I suspect in the long run we will see the emergence of a combined PPL/IR approach, which really makes more sense, since most of the learning is focused on navigation and communication anyway. Plus this will really represent a big step up in capabilities for the pilot and make the effort worthwhile. Finally, if we can build up a meaningfully larger community of IFR pilots, we'll see what happens when you get a high-volume, competitive marketplace. Look at how much boat you get for $150k, often with a ton of electronics, a lot more moving parts, two large engines, and a furnished interior. GA aircraft will always be more expensive but there's a lot of room for economies of scale to improve things. But first we need more pilots. Best, -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HALLIBURTON BRIBES, LOOTS ... AND MAKES A "HEALTHY PROFIT" | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 16 | February 1st 04 07:27 AM |