A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F-4 chaff/flare loads



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 03, 11:08 PM
Bob Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default F-4 chaff/flare loads

Anyone have data on typical chaff/flare loads for F-4's, both in Vietnam and
modern day? Thanks

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------

"Flying, like the sea, is not inherently dangerous... just extremely
unforgiving"



  #2  
Old September 22nd 03, 12:21 AM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:08:02 -0400, "Bob Martin"
wrote:

Anyone have data on typical chaff/flare loads for F-4's, both in Vietnam and
modern day? Thanks


No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No
self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about
the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open
the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the
mission. One time use.

Chaff for corridors was mostly chaff bombs dropped by specific fragged
flights. Very limited deployment at end of '72 of ALE-38 chaff
dispenser for corridor laying.

ALE-40 dispensers were added to F-4Es around '74-'75. We never got
them on C models in USAFE at all.


  #3  
Old September 22nd 03, 03:55 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Bob Martin" wrote:

Anyone have data on typical chaff/flare loads for F-4's, both in Vietnam and
modern day? Thanks


In the 1980s, they used to load half and half on the dispensers. Since
the flare loads were larger, it ended up as a 2:1 margin chaff/flare.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #4  
Old September 22nd 03, 06:57 AM
Buzzer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:21:09 GMT, Ed Rasimus
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:08:02 -0400, "Bob Martin"
wrote:

Anyone have data on typical chaff/flare loads for F-4's, both in Vietnam and
modern day? Thanks


No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No
self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about
the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open
the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the
mission. One time use.


ECM bring your brooms to the arming area. Grumble, grumble, pilot.

Chaff for corridors was mostly chaff bombs dropped by specific fragged
flights. Very limited deployment at end of '72 of ALE-38 chaff
dispenser for corridor laying.


Did you ever hear of anyone in SEA flying the old ALE-2 chaff tanks.
The ones used on T-33 along with the I-band ALQ-72 for interceptor
training at some bases. I was at Tyndall and around 1973 we got a
message in to make our chaff tanks 100% OR and ready to ship out. The
mechanism that held the chaff down hadn't been used in years because
the T-33 wasn't exactly a high speed aircraft.
They might have dropped that idea come to think of it since we put the
same inards of the tank inside on the rotating weapons door of the
f-101 and at high speed the chaff and tapes were sucked out right over
the dispenser. F-101 would land with a 100 ft. of chaff tapes flapping
in the wind from the weapons door.
I left the base before hearing what happened with the tanks..


ALE-40 dispensers were added to F-4Es around '74-'75. We never got
them on C models in USAFE at all.


  #5  
Old September 22nd 03, 11:23 AM
Tom Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:08:02 -0400, "Bob Martin"
wrote:

Anyone have data on typical chaff/flare loads for F-4's, both in Vietnam

and
modern day? Thanks


No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No
self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about
the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open
the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the
mission. One time use.


Ed,
do you possibly know the reasons why no chaff/flare dispensers were mounted
on Phantoms at the time (and, AFAIK, for most of the 1970s)?

From the standpoint of our days this appears as a very strange measure to
me: given how many R-13 shots could have been averted over Vietnam alone....

BTW, from what I know a USAF Lt.Col. who was in the back-seat of the IIAF
RF-4E when this was intercepted by a Soviet AF MiG-21 deep inside the Soviet
airspace, in November 1973, used photo-flash cartriges to decoy four R-13s:
this was the reason the Soviet pilot had no other way out but to ram the
Phantom (one could find this story on the walls of quite a few former Soviet
AF bases in East Germany). The MiG-pilot was killed when his plane
disintegrated, while the Iranain pilot and the USAF WSO survived. Although
the engagement happened by the day, the crew of that RF-4E said the
cartriges were so powerful, they had a feeling somebody turned a second sun
right behind their backs each time one was deployed....

Tom Cooper
Co-Author:
Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988:
http://www.acig.org/pg1/content.php
and,
Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat:
http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585




  #6  
Old September 22nd 03, 01:06 PM
José Herculano
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No
self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about
the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open
the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the
mission. One time use.


I believe that is correct for Air Force F-4s only, Ed. Navy Phantoms had
internal chaff/flare carriage (mid fuselage, both sides, close to the RAT).
_____________
José Herculano


  #7  
Old September 22nd 03, 01:34 PM
Bob Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that is correct for Air Force F-4s only, Ed. Navy Phantoms had
internal chaff/flare carriage (mid fuselage, both sides, close to the

RAT).

How many of each?


  #8  
Old September 22nd 03, 03:03 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:23:25 GMT, "Tom Cooper" wrote:

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
.. .


No flares on F-4s in SEA. (Photo-flash carts on RF-4s only). No
self-protection chaff carts either. We carried cardboard boxes (about
the size of a box of Xmas tree tinsel) in the speedbrake wells. Open
the boards to deploy. Try not to use speed brakes earlier in the
mission. One time use.


Ed,
do you possibly know the reasons why no chaff/flare dispensers were mounted
on Phantoms at the time (and, AFAIK, for most of the 1970s)?

From the standpoint of our days this appears as a very strange measure to
me: given how many R-13 shots could have been averted over Vietnam alone....


Tom Cooper


They weren't mounted because they didn't yet exist. The ALE-40 (the
blister dispenser bolted on the side of the wing pylons) came into
production around '73 or '74 after the air war was over. As I
mentioned, the operational E-models got them, but they never got
retrofitted to the C's that were still active. (I don't know about the
D's.)

What's an R-13? Do you mean SA-7 or Atoll?

SA-7 was pretty much a "no threat" for fast movers in SEA. Atoll was a
player, but if you knew the guy was back there, you maneuvered to
defeat. If you didn't know he was there, flares wouldn't have been
much good. A lot of the MiG successes were unseen blow throughs where
flares wouldn't have been employed.

  #9  
Old September 22nd 03, 03:47 PM
Juvat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Cooper posted:

BTW, from what I know a USAF Lt.Col. who was in the back-seat of the IIAF
RF-4E ...used photo-flash cartriges to decoy four R-13s:


Really? By 1980 no photo-flash cart in the USAF would have done that,
wrong band of the IR spectrum...versus the IR seeker's spectrum. Thank
goodness for early generation technology theft.

the engagement happened by the day, the crew of that RF-4E said the
cartriges were so powerful, they had a feeling somebody turned a second sun
right behind their backs each time one was deployed....


Interesting that they had photo-flash carts for a day mission and not
wall-to-wall chaff bundles in the cart breeches. And awfully sharp of
the WSO to select the "Night" position on the camera control panel so
he could puke the carts...that's what he'd have to do in a USAF RF-4C
in 1973, according to an RF-4C-1 (1975) the USAF didn't have IRCM
flares yet.

Juvat
  #10  
Old September 22nd 03, 06:38 PM
Tom Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:23:25 GMT, "Tom Cooper" wrote:


They weren't mounted because they didn't yet exist. The ALE-40 (the
blister dispenser bolted on the side of the wing pylons) came into
production around '73 or '74 after the air war was over. As I
mentioned, the operational E-models got them, but they never got
retrofitted to the C's that were still active. (I don't know about the
D's.)


I see. Thanks.

One more question, if you don't mind: what was the chaff/flare dispenser
that could have been mounted into one of the rear Sparrow-bays, and when was
it introduced?

What's an R-13? Do you mean SA-7 or Atoll?


That's the original service designation for the AA-2 Atoll (K-13 was the
design designation).

I know the SA-7 was not that widespread nor as a serious a threat as some
other stuff at the time, and remember from reding Mitchel's "Clashes" and
few other books about the air war in SEA how often it happened that the
first warning from a MiG was either a Phantom or a Thud going up in flames.

But, in several cases the attacks were noticed when one of the crews saw
contrails from R-13s being underway behind them. Clear, the R-13 could't do
much against a maneuvering aircraft (AFAIK any maneuver beyond 2g was too
much for it to track), but, IMHO, perhaps the use of flare-dispensers
could've saved a crew or two more?

Tom Cooper
Co-Author:
Iran-Iraq War in the Air, 1980-1988:
http://www.acig.org/pg1/content.php
and,
Iranian F-4 Phantom II Units in Combat:
http://www.osprey-publishing.co.uk/t...hp/title=S6585


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.