If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Pentagon axes development of Comanche helicopter"
Pentagon axes development of Comanche helicopter
The Pentagon announced yesterday that it is canceling the Army's program to build a new helicopter after spending about $7 billion in development costs. http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...5809-1679r.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I sorta kinda agree with the reasoning that was given by the Army (as
detailed in the newspaper today), but (a) did they have to spend $7B before deciding this? (b) I was really looking forward to its deployment - selfishly, as a helicopter pilot/enthusiast I think it's a beautiful aircraft. (c) may I please have one of the airframes that is currently on the production line to put in my pasture? I think it would make fine Yard Art. Dave Blevins On 24 Feb 2004 09:08:44 -0800, (Mike) wrote: Pentagon axes development of Comanche helicopter The Pentagon announced yesterday that it is canceling the Army's program to build a new helicopter after spending about $7 billion in development costs. http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...5809-1679r.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
(a) did they have to spend $7B before deciding this?
I find it amazing that they were able to come to the conclusion at all. The system so often just keeps on going after the momentum is initiated and we are left with weapon systems that either dont work right or are obsolete before they are deployed. Anyone see the report on the Patriot Missile? We have been misled on how well it works....or should I say how it doesnt work. Unless you count shooting down your own aircraft as working. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BTW for my Real Job I did a customer visit to Lockheed-Martin in Florida
last year, and one thing that blew me away is that they had been working on Comanche hardware and software for TEN YEARS. That kind of development cycle puts some interesting challenges in front of the companies that provide their hardware/software development tools - i.e. we would like to obsolete incredibly old versions of our development tools *eventually*. In other words, I believe that Windows 3.1 was state-of-the-art ten years ago. Or was it Windows 2.0? It's been so long... I just hope that some aspects of the Comanche development effort are used in some other products/systems, so that those 1o years of many peoples' work and sweat equity wasn't a complete waste. May DOS rest in peace, Dave Blevins On 24 Feb 2004 23:40:15 GMT, idday (jimmineecricket) wrote: (a) did they have to spend $7B before deciding this? I find it amazing that they were able to come to the conclusion at all. The system so often just keeps on going after the momentum is initiated and we are left with weapon systems that either dont work right or are obsolete before they are deployed. Anyone see the report on the Patriot Missile? We have been misled on how well it works....or should I say how it doesnt work. Unless you count shooting down your own aircraft as working. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BTW for my Real Job I did a customer visit to Lockheed-Martin in Florida last year, and one thing that blew me away is that they had been working on Comanche hardware and software for TEN YEARS. That kind of development cycle puts some interesting challenges in front of the companies that provide their hardware/software development tools - i.e. we would like to obsolete incredibly old versions of our development tools *eventually*. In other words, I believe that Windows 3.1 was state-of-the-art ten years ago. Or was it Windows 2.0? It's been so long... I just hope that some aspects of the Comanche development effort are used in some other products/systems, so that those 1o years of many peoples' work and sweat equity wasn't a complete waste. May DOS rest in peace, Dave Blevins I saw the briefing on TV and the general said that the block 3 apache will incorporate much of the comanche technologly with the exception of the stealth stuff. So it is not going to be a complete waste. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
were given enough funding to do the
program right. That's the cruel reality - we were finally funded and on track to complete on schedule, and we were cancelled.... Dan Hollenbaugh Comanche Test Engineer I was sorry to hear that the program was canceled. I certainly do not know anything of the technical achievements or hurdles yet to overcome, but it certainly looked like an exciting new airframe. I felt the same way about the Navy's A-12 and then they ended up with the F/A 18E/F. Craig |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Answers to your questions:
(a) Yes, because fundiing was spooned out in totally inadequate portions. Had we been allowed to keep the initial funding profile we were given in 1990, we would have fielded the aircraft in 1995 for far less than the $6B (not 7) spent to date. Instead, the Army just waffled along, wasting money. (b) Me too - I'm one of the few people that's seen it fly. (c) Nope - I'm the civilian test director, and I own the only two airframes. I'm hoping to send #1 to the Ft Rucker Aviation Museum, and put #2 on a stick in front of my office at Redstone Arsenal. (But I'm just the test guy, and probably won't get to decide) Dan Hollenbaugh Comanche Test Engineer wrote in message ... I sorta kinda agree with the reasoning that was given by the Army (as detailed in the newspaper today), but (a) did they have to spend $7B before deciding this? (b) I was really looking forward to its deployment - selfishly, as a helicopter pilot/enthusiast I think it's a beautiful aircraft. (c) may I please have one of the airframes that is currently on the production line to put in my pasture? I think it would make fine Yard Art. Dave Blevins On 24 Feb 2004 09:08:44 -0800, (Mike) wrote: Pentagon axes development of Comanche helicopter The Pentagon announced yesterday that it is canceling the Army's program to build a new helicopter after spending about $7 billion in development costs. http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...5809-1679r.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article k.net,
Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh wrote: [snip] (b) Me too - I'm one of the few people that's seen it fly. [snip] Dan Hollenbaugh Comanche Test Engineer I hope you got to see the last flight of the Comanche this week. My brother said it was a pretty impressive demonstration. Hopefully someone was running the video camera. ;-) Too bad this impressive airframe is going away. I would have liked to see one in person, but some odd thing about national security. Oh well, hopefully one will show up in a museum somewhere so we can get a close look at it. Steve |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have the PM's permission to bring it to Redstone for one last demo. I
expect to see the final flight. Dan H. Steve Waltner wrote in message ... In article k.net, Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh wrote: [snip] (b) Me too - I'm one of the few people that's seen it fly. [snip] Dan Hollenbaugh Comanche Test Engineer I hope you got to see the last flight of the Comanche this week. My brother said it was a pretty impressive demonstration. Hopefully someone was running the video camera. ;-) Too bad this impressive airframe is going away. I would have liked to see one in person, but some odd thing about national security. Oh well, hopefully one will show up in a museum somewhere so we can get a close look at it. Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pentagon Reviews Health of Helicopter Industrial Base | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | August 22nd 04 07:23 AM |
Commanche alternatives? | John Cook | Military Aviation | 99 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
Commanche alternatives? | Kevin Brooks | Naval Aviation | 23 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
Army ends 20-year helicopter program | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 12 | February 27th 04 07:48 PM |
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | November 19th 03 02:18 PM |