A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 13th 07, 03:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Bill Kambic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:30:38 -0700, Walt wrote:


Even if the Osprey worked perfectly, it is still a boondoggle because
it can't make opposed (or even potentially opposed) landings without
helicoptor gunship escorts.


By this reasoning the B-17 was useless because it suffered catatrophic
losses without fighter escort.

And that would make the Mosquito about the sole, successful bomber of
WWII.

The extra speed and range provided by the tilt rotor technology is
useless.


You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me
that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new
technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out
will be known in 25 years or so, not now.

Some of that history will be written in blood, too. That's part of
the life of being a Marine (or any other member in the sevice of the
Constitution).

So why don't you drain your Vitriol tank and give it a rest?

  #2  
Old October 13th 07, 06:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Duwop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator

On Oct 12, 7:49 pm, Bill Kambic wrote:
You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me
that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new
technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out
will be known in 25 years or so, not now.


You are aware that it's been in developement for 25 years already
right?

So you could easily say that "in 25 years or so" is now, not in
another 25 years.


  #3  
Old October 13th 07, 06:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Bill Kambic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:08:37 -0700, Duwop wrote:

On Oct 12, 7:49 pm, Bill Kambic wrote:
You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me
that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new
technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out
will be known in 25 years or so, not now.


You are aware that it's been in developement for 25 years already
right?


Ayup.

So you could easily say that "in 25 years or so" is now, not in
another 25 years.


No, Sir, becauase "developoment" is not "deployment." Everything to
date is theoretical. Maybe the practice will show strengths not yet
appreciated and maybe we'll see weaknesses not yet identified.

Until you put it to work in the hands of Naval Aviators on a day to
day basis you really don't know if it will work or not.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V.V. Utgoff Naval Aviator QDurham Military Aviation 1 March 14th 11 01:49 AM
Naval Aviator Slots- HELP!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 22 April 23rd 07 05:15 AM
Naval aviator & NFO attire while underway Paul Michael Brown Naval Aviation 16 July 16th 04 12:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.