If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:30:38 -0700, Walt wrote:
Even if the Osprey worked perfectly, it is still a boondoggle because it can't make opposed (or even potentially opposed) landings without helicoptor gunship escorts. By this reasoning the B-17 was useless because it suffered catatrophic losses without fighter escort. And that would make the Mosquito about the sole, successful bomber of WWII. The extra speed and range provided by the tilt rotor technology is useless. You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out will be known in 25 years or so, not now. Some of that history will be written in blood, too. That's part of the life of being a Marine (or any other member in the sevice of the Constitution). So why don't you drain your Vitriol tank and give it a rest? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator
On Oct 12, 7:49 pm, Bill Kambic wrote:
You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out will be known in 25 years or so, not now. You are aware that it's been in developement for 25 years already right? So you could easily say that "in 25 years or so" is now, not in another 25 years. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
V-22 Defender Strikes + V-22 Assessment by a Ret. Naval Aviator
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:08:37 -0700, Duwop wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:49 pm, Bill Kambic wrote: You don't like the program. That's pretty clear. But it seems to me that you're allowing your prejudices to overcome reason. Every new technology has problems. Whether or not this technology works out will be known in 25 years or so, not now. You are aware that it's been in developement for 25 years already right? Ayup. So you could easily say that "in 25 years or so" is now, not in another 25 years. No, Sir, becauase "developoment" is not "deployment." Everything to date is theoretical. Maybe the practice will show strengths not yet appreciated and maybe we'll see weaknesses not yet identified. Until you put it to work in the hands of Naval Aviators on a day to day basis you really don't know if it will work or not. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
V.V. Utgoff Naval Aviator | QDurham | Military Aviation | 1 | March 14th 11 01:49 AM |
Naval Aviator Slots- HELP!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 22 | April 23rd 07 05:15 AM |
Naval aviator & NFO attire while underway | Paul Michael Brown | Naval Aviation | 16 | July 16th 04 12:30 AM |