If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
POL: most anti-aviation city in the nation
"Alan Petrillo" wrote We haven't been living in America since GWB was appointed President. Please add "POL: to the subject line of your post, when you throw in crap like that. Oh, by the way, I'm "SURE" that GWB really gives a **** what someone is doing in podunk county, building an airplane. That is local politics, plain and simple. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
(a) Flying craft and airboats shall not be parked or stored, other
than in completely enclosed buildings, on residentially-zoned property, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Airboats may however, be parked or stored in the water adjacent to, on docking facilities of, or in a yard fronting a navigable waterbody of, a residential PUD district and a property in the residential portion of a mixed-use PUD district. (b) Repairing, testing, operation, constructing, modifying or altering flying craft and airboats shall be prohibited in all residential districts, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. If I were a lawyer (and I'm not...don't even play one on TV), I would push the equal protection under the law ideas. First, take issue with their definition of just what is "keeping with the nature of a residential neighborhood". And then bring up the issue of people changing their own car's oil or airfilter, or even painting a lawn chair. Personally, I see this as a continued trend in the transformation of the American public from citizens to consumers. (You're only allowed to do it if they sell a kit for it at Home Depot.) -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
You all are getting up in arms about a supposed slap in the face to
homebuilt aircraft. Truth be told, you could probably find a similar statute about firearms, muscle cars, or ham radio antennas in a lot of municipalities around the country. Here's the blunt truth of it. The fellow that wrote that statute thought (s)he was doing the right thing. That's right. Nobody in local elected office does something because they are inherently evil. They saw what they perceived as something the majority of the constituency wanted and wrote the law accordingly. The parallel to this is that the fellow that wrote it put his/her pants on in the morning one leg at a time, just like you do. (S)he works and draws a paycheck for his labor just like you do. (S)he was not born into political office, but got there because (s)he perceived the guy that was there was not listening to what the constituency wanted done and guess what? If (s)he got elected, the guy was NOT doing what the constituency wanted or they would have kept the other guy in office. So don't bitch about "fighting city hall". If you don't like the way things are being done, run for the office. One of two things will happen. You will get elected and then YOU get the opportunity to listen to what your neighbors want to have done. Or, you will lose, but that gives you the chops for the next four years to call up the winner and remind them that you got damn near as many votes as they did and this law they are writing is not a good idea. Remember Jefferson: "For democracy to fail it is only necessary that good men do nothing." Jim Nevada County Supervisor (Commissioner), Retired In 8 years rebuilt the airport, built a new jail, a new library, a new sanitary landfill, and kept 25,000 voters reasonably happy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
"RST Engineering" wrote in message ... You all are getting up in arms about a supposed slap in the face to homebuilt aircraft. Truth be told, you could probably find a similar statute about firearms, muscle cars, or ham radio antennas in a lot of municipalities around the country. Here's the blunt truth of it. The fellow that wrote that statute thought (s)he was doing the right thing. That's right. Nobody in local elected office does something because they are inherently evil. They saw what they perceived as something the majority of the constituency wanted and wrote the law accordingly. The parallel to this is that the fellow that wrote it put his/her pants on in the morning one leg at a time, just like you do. (S)he works and draws a paycheck for his labor just like you do. (S)he was not born into political office, but got there because (s)he perceived the guy that was there was not listening to what the constituency wanted done and guess what? If (s)he got elected, the guy was NOT doing what the constituency wanted or they would have kept the other guy in office. So don't bitch about "fighting city hall". If you don't like the way things are being done, run for the office. One of two things will happen. You will get elected and then YOU get the opportunity to listen to what your neighbors want to have done. Or, you will lose, but that gives you the chops for the next four years to call up the winner and remind them that you got damn near as many votes as they did and this law they are writing is not a good idea. Remember Jefferson: "For democracy to fail it is only necessary that good men do nothing." Jim Nevada County Supervisor (Commissioner), Retired In 8 years rebuilt the airport, built a new jail, a new library, a new sanitary landfill, and kept 25,000 voters reasonably happy. And to add to Jim's post: Attend the city council meetings and find out what the real problem is/was. I'm betting that someone was bucking rivets at 1 AM. All it would take is one neighbor bucking rivets at 1 AM for me to try to get homebuilding declared at capital offense! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
RST Engineering wrote: You all are getting up in arms about a supposed slap in the face to homebuilt aircraft. Truth be told, you could probably find a similar statute about firearms, muscle cars, or ham radio antennas in a lot of municipalities around the country. Here's the blunt truth of it. The fellow that wrote that statute thought (s)he was doing the right thing. That's right. Nobody in local elected office does something because they are inherently evil. They saw what they perceived as something the majority of the constituency wanted and wrote the law accordingly. The problem is that a lot of people go into poitics to satisfy a desire (dare I say greed?) for money, power, or both. Their idea of a 'good thing' often includes things that would be charitably described as predatory. So don't bitch about "fighting city hall". If you don't like the way things are being done, run for the office. Alternatively, speak out about those who are running. ... Remember Jefferson: "For democracy to fail it is only necessary that good men do nothing." Hmm, just nitpicking here but that sounds too similar to a famous "For the triumph of evil" saying attributed to someone else. -- FF |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
Ernest Christley wrote:
And then bring up the issue of people changing their own car's oil or airfilter, or even painting a lawn chair. In several cities auto repair is prohibited unless done at a commercial auto repair shop or wholly inside an enclosed garage. I had a serpentine belt break once. I was able to pull into the parking lot of a Kragen before it overheated, and I bought a new belt. I was installing it in the parking lot when a cop car came past, and it cost me a $56 ticket - and that was just installing a belt, with a spring tightener - I didn't even need to take off a single bolt to replace it. Richard |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
"Don W" wrote in message . net... Sounds like someone needs to talk with their city council to figure out what the real issues are and try to reach a compromise such that everyone can be happy. Getting ****ed off and ignoring your neighbor's concerns doesn't work well. If they were working in their closed garage and not making a lot of noise, then no one would even know what they were doing, and it would not be a concern. I read it as only prohibiting it, if the craft was an unenclosed garage. No? -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of:
greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? Lou |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
"Lou" wrote in message ups.com... I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of: greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? No I was not the guy in question. I was just trying to interpret the legalese, and that is how it read to me. I do not think that any city can regulate what you do behind CLOSED doors, as long as it is not commercial in nature. The other guy that had his insurance canceled has a hard lick, but there is basis from the department of insurance and the fire marshal against manufacturing and repair of aircraft without fire suppression. If he were to install sprinklers and fire rated separation between his work area and the rest of the house, he probably would not have a problem getting insurance, but the premiums could be higher, based on the type of activity going on in that higher risk environment. -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
most anti-aviation city in the nation
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Lou" wrote in message ups.com... I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of: greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? No I was not the guy in question. I was just trying to interpret the legalese, and that is how it read to me. I do not think that any city can regulate what you do behind CLOSED doors, as long as it is not commercial in nature. The other guy that had his insurance canceled has a hard lick, but there is basis from the department of insurance and the fire marshal against manufacturing and repair of aircraft without fire suppression. If he were to install sprinklers and fire rated separation between his work area and the rest of the house, he probably would not have a problem getting insurance, but the premiums could be higher, based on the type of activity going on in that higher risk environment. Several cities (not to mention areas with covenants) have prohibited working on cars in one's garage, even with the door closed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bakersfield Municipal Airport May Be Sold To Developers | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 3 | November 23rd 05 03:00 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |