If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
On 15 Mar, 13:15, Bob Cook wrote:
So it is possible to be in "good" tow position, and have the rope impart a forward and downward pull (relative) to the glider! * I'd expect high tow to give a downwards pull and low tow to give an upwards one. 20 degrees still seems like a lot to me. *I guess it depends on the weight of the rope, and the drag on the glider. Seems a lot to me as well. What are these people towing with - chain? Ian |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
On 15 Mar, 17:18, sisu1a wrote:
Hmm, I'm of the understanding that we use Pawnees because they are so lightly wingloaded (relative to other tugs) and have such good power/ weight ratios when not full of bug juice and spray gear. I thought this is also what allows them to happily fly too slow for our tastes as well. While a Pawnee is perfectly content tugging at 55mph, I'm not. The vortex strength is inversely proportional to the airspeed. For a free vortex, the lift per metre is the vorticity times the free stream velocity. For an aircraft, the vortex strength is therefore approximately weight / (airspeed x span). PS. the propwash to wingwash ratio should be pretty easy to figure out. The main wing has to support the entire a/c (couple thousand pounds) while the little spinning wing only needs to provide thrust. (couple hundred pounds?) *Which do YOU think is dominating the scene? Each blade of a Pawnee propeller is about 1m long. Each Pawnee wing is about 5m long. With the engine at 3000rpm, the tip velocity will be about 300m/s, which is about 150kt. 200bhp (150kW) at 60kt (30m/s) is 5kN. The maximum takeoff weight of a Pawnee is about 12.5kN. So ... 0.4 times the force, 0.2 times the span, 2.5 times the airspeed ... the propeller vorticity will be around 80% of the wing vorticity. Ball park. Then you have to remember that the effects of the vortex shedding are felt, mostly, in a cylinder of about twice the diameter of the span, and that the air velocity is inversely proportional to the distance from the vortex. The propeller's vortex street is going to be about 4m across, the wing's about 20m across.... Finally, there is a danger of confusing two things here. The vortex wake of a lifting surface is *not* the same as the turbulent wake. It's bigger and lasts longer. Ian |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Help; what is "dimer" ?
At 14:09 15 March 2009, Bruce wrote: Paul There is a large scale vortex dimer operating behind any aircraft, and particularly behind high wing loading, heavy short winged things like Pawnees. The wake we fly above in high tow is the turbulent propeller wake, but we would have to be impossibly high and/or far back to avoid the downward moving centre section of the dimer. I saw a picture using smoke trails that demonstrates the scale and power of this some years back - http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud...ry/Vortex.html There is a more impressive video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy0hgG2pkUs&NR=1 So - given that you are flying in a field of air that has a significant downward component, maybe you do have a higher angle of attack on the wings. Bottom line is that even in the smooth air above the propwash you are still in air affected by the tug. Bruce sisu1a wrote: Agreed. My money is on the towplane wake. I put my monies on the elevator authority/AoA ratio. We fly above the wing wake (USA...) in most cases, in relatively clean air, but sometimes in the clean air below it. Box the wake, it will tell you where it is and where it isn't... But typically glider's noses, on tow, are unnaturally high (and thus AoA is higher...) for a given airspeed, in addition to being more forcefully held there, both effects of course due to the rope's pull. The elevator is the same size whether on tow or free flight though, so the authority it can exert against the countering forces is proportionately lower than in free flight... The fix is the same regardless of why though- more speed... please! (wings rocking in vain...) -Paul |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Help; what is "dimer" ?
At 14:09 15 March 2009, Bruce wrote: Paul There is a large scale vortex dimer operating behind any aircraft, and particularly behind high wing loading, heavy short winged things like Pawnees. The wake we fly above in high tow is the turbulent propeller wake, but we would have to be impossibly high and/or far back to avoid the downward moving centre section of the dimer. I saw a picture using smoke trails that demonstrates the scale and power of this some years back - http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud...ry/Vortex.html There is a more impressive video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy0hgG2pkUs&NR=1 So - given that you are flying in a field of air that has a significant downward component, maybe you do have a higher angle of attack on the wings. Bottom line is that even in the smooth air above the propwash you are still in air affected by the tug. Bruce sisu1a wrote: Agreed. My money is on the towplane wake. I put my monies on the elevator authority/AoA ratio. We fly above the wing wake (USA...) in most cases, in relatively clean air, but sometimes in the clean air below it. Box the wake, it will tell you where it is and where it isn't... But typically glider's noses, on tow, are unnaturally high (and thus AoA is higher...) for a given airspeed, in addition to being more forcefully held there, both effects of course due to the rope's pull. The elevator is the same size whether on tow or free flight though, so the authority it can exert against the countering forces is proportionately lower than in free flight... The fix is the same regardless of why though- more speed... please! (wings rocking in vain...) -Paul |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Help; what is "dimer" ?
At 14:09 15 March 2009, Bruce wrote: Paul There is a large scale vortex dimer operating behind any aircraft, and particularly behind high wing loading, heavy short winged things like Pawnees. The wake we fly above in high tow is the turbulent propeller wake, but we would have to be impossibly high and/or far back to avoid the downward moving centre section of the dimer. I saw a picture using smoke trails that demonstrates the scale and power of this some years back - http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstud...ry/Vortex.html There is a more impressive video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy0hgG2pkUs&NR=1 So - given that you are flying in a field of air that has a significant downward component, maybe you do have a higher angle of attack on the wings. Bottom line is that even in the smooth air above the propwash you are still in air affected by the tug. Bruce sisu1a wrote: Agreed. My money is on the towplane wake. I put my monies on the elevator authority/AoA ratio. We fly above the wing wake (USA...) in most cases, in relatively clean air, but sometimes in the clean air below it. Box the wake, it will tell you where it is and where it isn't... But typically glider's noses, on tow, are unnaturally high (and thus AoA is higher...) for a given airspeed, in addition to being more forcefully held there, both effects of course due to the rope's pull. The elevator is the same size whether on tow or free flight though, so the authority it can exert against the countering forces is proportionately lower than in free flight... The fix is the same regardless of why though- more speed... please! (wings rocking in vain...) -Paul |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
At 21:00 15 March 2009, Nyal Williams wrote:
Help; what is "dimer" ? A pair of vortices? |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
I dyslexed the tow rope length. It should have been 200 feet, not 120
feet, although they can vary between 190 and 230 (we use a longer rope when launching off the dirt). I have towed enough to know where the wake is, thank you very much! |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
Can I add another question, why does the adverse yaw at 60 on tow appear to
be more than 60 in free flight, many students learing to aerotow have difficulty with the rudder. At 00:27 16 March 2009, Mike the Strike wrote: I dyslexed the tow rope length. It should have been 200 feet, not 120 feet, although they can vary between 190 and 230 (we use a longer rope when launching off the dirt). I have towed enough to know where the wake is, thank you very much! |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
At 19:58 15 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote:
I'd expect high tow to give a downwards pull and low tow to give an upwards one. So, that implies that there is a position, on tow, where the rope would neither impart an upward pull nor impart a downward pull. This would certainly make the vector analysis simpler. Unfortunately, I bet this position would be just about in the top of the wake somewhere. I did go over to our tow plane yesterday, while it was sitting on the ground, and I pulled on the loose end of the rope to see how hard a pull would give how much sag. It took suprisingly little force to lift the center of the rope off the ground. Figure my end of the rope was 4 feet off the ground and the tow plane end was only 1 foot off the ground, I got the center of the rope easily about 2 feet off the ground. Point being: the angle with which the rope intersected with me was very small. I also weighed a tow rope. Under 5 lbs, with two Schweizer rings, and an adaptor with a tost ring. So I figure, in a "level" tow the weight of the rope imparts only about 2 lbs down force to the glider. So you need generate about two more lbs of lift to counter act this. Signifagant? i don't think so. A also paid attention to the rope on a couple of tows, and also noted that although there is a noticable sag in the rope, it was really not all that much. I also noted, in the case of a 2-33 and a Blanik L-13 (the crap that I usually have to fly) that BOTH of these gliders fly NOTICIBLY nose down on tow! (which menas the rope is imparting a nose up force vector, even in normal, tow position. ) Anyone who has flow a 2-33 knows that it takes CONSIDERABLE forward stick force when on tow. I have experienced the "too slow tow" phenomonon in the '33. (never got a too-slow in the Blanik) Again, my point being that I am still not convinced that anyone has completly explained the phenomonon, that we all agree exists! Cookie forward and downward pull (relative) to the glider! =A0 I'd expect high tow to give a downwards pull and low tow to give an upwards one. Seems a lot to me as well. What are these people towing with - chain? Ian |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
motorgliders as towplanes
I have not noticed any difference in adverse yaw on tow vs free flgiht. I
will pay attention to that and see. On tow however, students often seem to try to "steer" with the stick (only). This of course leads to adverse yaw, which causes to student to further try to steer with the stick adding further adverse yaw, etc. It can get out of hand quickly. In fact, on tow, "steering" should be done with (almost) only rudder! I find that application of rudder will yeild bank angle as well. (dihedral effect, advancing wing etc.) I tell students to use the sitck in order to match the glider's wings to the tow planes wings (bank angle) and use the rudder to "point" the nose where desired. (They wrongly try to point the nose using the stick and adverse yaw gets them every time) I have noticed that while turning on tow, the stick is often to the outside of the turn, preventing "overbanking" tendancy!. I also tell students, use 80% rudder and 20% stick to demonstrate the need for rudder on tow, and minimal stick forces. Here is another one. In normal tow position, I notice that the stick has to be slightly LEFT of center. The glider has a tendancy to want to roll right. I beleive this is because to tug's wake has a rotation to it. (even above the wake) Students tend to mechanically "center" the stick, and the glider will roll right. Experienced pilots naturally put the stick whereven necessary to achieve wings level. I often ask them if they were holding left stick. Invariably they say , "I dunno" Cookie At 10:15 16 March 2009, Alan Garside wrote: Can I add another question, why does the adverse yaw at 60 on tow appear to be more than 60 in free flight, many students learing to aerotow have difficulty with the rudder. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking towplanes for Region 9 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 06 12:03 AM |
US:Restricted Towplanes | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 8 | November 5th 04 11:27 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Take-upReels on Towplanes | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 9 | April 21st 04 12:39 AM |
Helicopters and Towplanes | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | September 11th 03 05:21 PM |