If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
I'd like to turn this around since I'm not a physicist or an engineer.
What force causes a ball to roll down an inclined plane? At 00:00 18 March 2009, Bob Cook wrote: At 18:16 17 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: Ian, YOU did use the term "power" correctly. What I didn't like about it was that the question I posed referred to force. (OK, so you gave us some additional information) I agree that a sailplane, in gliding flight, in still air, has no "power" at all. (Although, as you said, some wrongly believe that gliders are "gravity powered") By some of the responses, I think I am correct in assuming that some confuse power, energy, and force. So I again ask, (not to Ian, but to some of the others who answered my question with "gravity",) how can gravity alone, a force which acts vertically downward, impart forward motion to a glider or anything for that matter? Cookie I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
On Mar 17, 5:00*pm, Bob Cook wrote:
At 18:16 17 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: Ian, YOU did use the term "power" correctly. What I didn't like about it was that the question I posed referred to force. *(OK, so you gave us some additional information) I agree that a sailplane, in gliding flight, in still air, *has no "power" at all. *(Although, as you said, some wrongly believe that gliders are "gravity powered") By some of the responses, I think I am correct in assuming that some confuse power, energy, and force. So I again ask, (not to Ian, but to some of the others who answered my question with "gravity",) how can gravity alone, a force which acts vertically downward, impart forward motion to a glider or anything for that matter? Cookie I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian Sigh. No a glider moving through still air even at a constant rate expends power. A glider has gravitational potential energy, the rate it converts that potential energy to overcome drag is an expenditure of power and you can talk about that as horsepower or kW etc. We plot these things now as polars, just with different display units. As I explained, Gravity provides the energy but the forward motion comes from the forward component of the lift vector. The large part of the lift vector is resisting the pull of gravity and as a side effect the horizontal part moves the glider forward, and conveniently the glider needs to move forward to create lift. Lucky thing that. Analogous to the chicken sliding down a ramp, gravity there also only acts through the center of mass yet the chicken does not fall vertically. I think this is obvious to any chicken sliding down a ramp. You need a chicken and a ramp and do the experiment then ask the chicken to explain why. Darryl |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
Darryl Ramm wrote:
Analogous to the chicken sliding down a ramp, gravity there also only acts through the center of mass yet the chicken does not fall vertically. I think this is obvious to any chicken sliding down a ramp. You need a chicken and a ramp and do the experiment then ask the chicken to explain why. That analogy is most fowl. I felt compelled to google the words chicken and gliders and found this: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/...n-glider-nose/ |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
That's an excellent analogy.
Mike Schumann "Nyal Williams" wrote in message ... I'd like to turn this around since I'm not a physicist or an engineer. What force causes a ball to roll down an inclined plane? At 00:00 18 March 2009, Bob Cook wrote: At 18:16 17 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: Ian, YOU did use the term "power" correctly. What I didn't like about it was that the question I posed referred to force. (OK, so you gave us some additional information) I agree that a sailplane, in gliding flight, in still air, has no "power" at all. (Although, as you said, some wrongly believe that gliders are "gravity powered") By some of the responses, I think I am correct in assuming that some confuse power, energy, and force. So I again ask, (not to Ian, but to some of the others who answered my question with "gravity",) how can gravity alone, a force which acts vertically downward, impart forward motion to a glider or anything for that matter? Cookie I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Soar Tow: Was Aerodynamics of Towing
It is past mid-night and all this is making me more goofy than usual;
howzabout renaming the thread? (Some of us are certainly tripped up.) OK, I apologize. At 03:30 18 March 2009, Mike Schumann wrote: That's an excellent analogy. Mike Schumann "Nyal Williams" wrote in message ... I'd like to turn this around since I'm not a physicist or an engineer. What force causes a ball to roll down an inclined plane? At 00:00 18 March 2009, Bob Cook wrote: At 18:16 17 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote: Ian, YOU did use the term "power" correctly. What I didn't like about it was that the question I posed referred to force. (OK, so you gave us some additional information) I agree that a sailplane, in gliding flight, in still air, has no "power" at all. (Although, as you said, some wrongly believe that gliders are "gravity powered") By some of the responses, I think I am correct in assuming that some confuse power, energy, and force. So I again ask, (not to Ian, but to some of the others who answered my question with "gravity",) how can gravity alone, a force which acts vertically downward, impart forward motion to a glider or anything for that matter? Cookie I don't. I used "power" because I meant "power"! Ian |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
The resultant of TWO forces.
The force of gravity downward, plus the force of the ramp pushing upward and forward, "normal" (at a right angle) to the ramp surface. This resultant force is parallel to the ramp. When this force is unbalanced, the ball will begin to roll and pick up speed until drag becomes equal to that resultant force. Then velocity will remain constant, and all forces are in balance, and the sum of the forces = zero. For glider, substitute lift for the ramp. Cookie "Nyal Williams" wrote in message ... I'd like to turn this around since I'm not a physicist or an engineer. What force causes a ball to roll down an inclined plane? |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
aerodynamics of gliding
Well, at least I did learn a lot from the previous thread, thanks mostly to
Ian who helped me "tidy up" some of my conceptions. Yes this is Jr High physics. I think if we took the final exam, Ian would get an "A", while I would get a "C" and most of the guys would do worse! Since everybody liked my "gravity" question so much, here is more from my pet peeve department. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has spoilers closed. Glider B opens spoilers. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "spoilers reduce lift". True or false? And why. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has flaps retracted. Glider B has flaps extended. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "flaps increase lift". True or false? And why. Cookie |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Aerodynamics of Towing
At 18:22 17 March 2009, Bob Whelan wrote:
Yebbut...imagine a glider magically inserted into earth's atmosphere after global warming has removed all grabbity. What gets it moving? It won't move. Why would it? Jim Beckman |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
aerodynamics of gliding
In free unaccelerated flight with no thrust, i.e. no aerotow, winch, or
turbo, a glider IS essentially gravity powered. The resultant force of gravity plus wing lift, angled very slightly forward, opposes drag. Thus a glider runs down a very slight slope through the air. The less drag there is, the flatter the glide angle becomes. Both airbrakes and large positive flap angles increase the drag, so the glider has to run down a steeper slope to maintain speed. Airbrakes both reduce lift, by disrupting the airflow over part of the wing, and increase drag, so the answer to that question is obvious. Large amounts of positive flap increases lift, but also increases drag to a much greater extent. Derek Copeland At 12:30 18 March 2009, Bob Cook wrote: Well, at least I did learn a lot from the previous thread, thanks mostly to Ian who helped me "tidy up" some of my conceptions. Yes this is Jr High physics. I think if we took the final exam, Ian would get an "A", while I would get a "C" and most of the guys would do worse! Since everybody liked my "gravity" question so much, here is more from my pet peeve department. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has spoilers closed. Glider B opens spoilers. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "spoilers reduce lift". True or false? And why. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has flaps retracted. Glider B has flaps extended. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "flaps increase lift". True or false? And why. Cookie |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
aerodynamics of gliding
"Derek Copeland" wrote in message ... In free unaccelerated flight with no thrust, i.e. no aerotow, winch, or turbo, a glider IS essentially gravity powered. The resultant force of gravity plus wing lift, angled very slightly forward, opposes drag. Thus a glider runs down a very slight slope through the air. The less drag there is, the flatter the glide angle becomes. Both airbrakes and large positive flap angles increase the drag, so the glider has to run down a steeper slope to maintain speed. Airbrakes both reduce lift, by disrupting the airflow over part of the wing, and increase drag, so the answer to that question is obvious. Large amounts of positive flap increases lift, but also increases drag to a much greater extent. Derek Copeland Just to add a bit to Derek's analysis. I fly a HP-14 which doesn't have spoilers and totally relies of large span flaps for glide slope control. The increase in lift is negligible as the flaps are extended beyond 45 degrees to 90 degrees. However, the increase in the drag produced is massive. At 50 kts with flaps set at 0 my HP-14 has a glide ratio about 38:1; however, with the flaps at 90 degrees the glide ratio at 50 kts is some where between 2:1 to 3:1. http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder/St...r_on_Flaps.htm Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder At 12:30 18 March 2009, Bob Cook wrote: Well, at least I did learn a lot from the previous thread, thanks mostly to Ian who helped me "tidy up" some of my conceptions. Yes this is Jr High physics. I think if we took the final exam, Ian would get an "A", while I would get a "C" and most of the guys would do worse! Since everybody liked my "gravity" question so much, here is more from my pet peeve department. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has spoilers closed. Glider B opens spoilers. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "spoilers reduce lift". True or false? And why. Q) Two identical gliders on final approach. Glider A has flaps retracted. Glider B has flaps extended. Glider B will make a steeper approach because "flaps increase lift". True or false? And why. Cookie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking towplanes for Region 9 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | May 17th 06 12:03 AM |
US:Restricted Towplanes | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 8 | November 5th 04 11:27 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Take-upReels on Towplanes | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 9 | April 21st 04 12:39 AM |
Helicopters and Towplanes | Burt Compton | Soaring | 6 | September 11th 03 05:21 PM |