If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Margy Natalie writes: Not always, there have been cases of planes landing together after a mid-air and many accidents happen on the ground also. I know a gentleman who flew in WWII and tells a great story of his first mid-air where the opponent removed half his wing. Listeners often ask how he managed to get back to the field and he explains it was going just fine when he was jumped again and had to dogfight with half a wing. He managed to get back to base and flew for many, many years after. In the old days, when planes were simple, slow, and relatively sturdy, things were very different. When I read Lindbergh's account of his New York-Paris flight and related stories, I was struck by how simple aviation was in those days. No licenses, no navaids beyond a compass or maybe a simple radio homing device, land anywhere it's flat, etc. He used to fly by just looking down out the window, even in bad weather. And his most famous flight was accomplished with a maritime chart he found in a San Diego shop, a compass, and a watch. Unfortunately, aviation is much more complicated, restrictive, and expensive now, even for private pilots. Not true. In most places not much has changed. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Peter Duniho writes: The attitude was that it was more important to get a physical box on the shelves of Walmart than to have something *in* the box that was worthy of being proud of making. That's just not an attitude I am capable of condoning, or being associated with ... All companies are like that today. Not even close to being true. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Thomas Borchert writes:
You couldn't be more wrong. Back then, flying airplanes was unaffordable for the vast majority of the population. Not the case today. I couldn't be more right. Flying airplanes was much more affordable back then, as there was almost no overhead beyond the price of the plane and some minimal maintenance. There were no licenses, certificates, lessons, airport fees, regulations, terrorist hysteria, etc., and fuel was cheap. Piloting was available to practically anyone who wanted to try it. Flying real planes was similar to flying hang gliders today. It was a hobby, mostly. Today it's a business, mostly. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Margy Natalie" wrote in message m... Mxsmanic wrote: Larry Dighera writes: Personally, I chose to reside ten minutes from the airport, so the drive is not too bad. A good solution if you have the option. But most people are constrained to live far from airports. The closest airport for me is about 12 miles away, as the crow (er, aircraft) flies. The ideal would be to live in one of those cool airparks where everyone has a driveway in front and a taxiway out back, but how many people can afford to do that? Generally the air time used exceeds the minimum daily flight time the FBO charges, so it's a non issue. But what about the time the aircraft is on the ground, away from its home base, over the course of the weekend? You aren't getting it. If the FBO has a 2 hr. per day minimum and you take the airplane for a week you are expected to put 14 hours flying time on it. So, for example, if you want to take a week long jaunt you can fly 4 hours the first day, 0 the second, 6 the third, 0 the fourth, 0the fifth, 2 the sixth and two the seventh. The plane sits like the rental car. You pay your 14 hours and you are good. Margy Or you fly two hours there, two hours back amd also pay for the 10 hours you did not fly. That reimburses the FBO for possible lost revenue while you have sole posession of the plane. Allen |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Thomas Borchert writes:
Only in simulation... If you can walk away from it, it's acceptable. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Margy Natalie writes:
You aren't getting it. If the FBO has a 2 hr. per day minimum and you take the airplane for a week you are expected to put 14 hours flying time on it. So, for example, if you want to take a week long jaunt you can fly 4 hours the first day, 0 the second, 6 the third, 0 the fourth, 0the fifth, 2 the sixth and two the seventh. The plane sits like the rental car. You pay your 14 hours and you are good. How much does it cost per hour? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Dave Stadt writes:
Not true. In most places not much has changed. Most places meaning where? Can I buy a plane for $30,000 and take it up for a spin from the nearest strip with no further formalities? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
Chris W writes:
If you live anywhere near Oklahoma City, you are welcome to come over and try mine. Just be warned if you do, you will never want to fly with out it again. I'm a couple of thousand miles away, alas! I'm rather conservative with sims. I ran plain vanilla Flight Simulator for fifteen years, without even a joystick. I bought a joystick a week ago, for the first time. I've added a few airports and some Dreamfleet and PMDG aircraft, but FS rapidly turns into a fragile house of cards when you add things, and the framerates plummet, especially during takeoff and landing when you need them most. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... "Jim Macklin" writes: I still prefer to look out a real window and follow rivers and streams. Roads and railroads are to straight. What's wrong with being straight? Not enough distinguishing features to make them useful landmarks. Though, that said, they can still be quite useful if you are in an area with only a few roads, or you already have a pretty good idea of where you are, or you cross-reference a road or railroad or similar feature with some more distinctive feature. Pete |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Flaps on take-off and landing
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Skylune, You forgot: In the little planes - you fly! In the little planes, you will waste at least $100K between the training, equipment, insurance, gas, etc. Care to back up those numbers (which are completely bogus)? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) He is including the tax you paid on your car to get to the airport, the tax you paid on the gas you put in your car, the tax that went to build the road to the airport, the tax to build the runway, the tax you paid to lengthen the runway, the cost of your plane, the tax you paid on your plane, the cost of your biennial, the cost of your medical, the cost of...........whoa, this IS expensive :-) Allen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|