If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
I want to thank Don and Stefan and others from Europe and the UK for
stepping in here. I am fighting a lonely battle to convince my fellow USA pilots that winch launch is a perfectly normal way to launch gliders and not some invention of the devil. Those few US pilots who have experienced a winch launch have most likely done so using horrendously inadequate equipment that would not have been allowed to operate in your countries. There is no standard training manuals so each instructor makes up their own. The results range from hilarious to deadly. With oil prices exceeding $60US/barrel in the last few days, and aviation fuel prices heading into uncharted territory, the viability of our 'air tow only' soaring operations comes into question. If oil prices continue on to $100/barrel, as the world bank and many investment houses predict, the US soaring community is in for some rough times if we don't quickly adopt a more fuel efficient launch method. To quickly shift to winch launch means that we will have to adopt the best practices of other countries who have developed winch launch to a high level of performance and safety. I appreciate your continued inputs. Bill Daniels |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Stefan writes
I'm sure you instruct your students correctly. The only thing I jumped on was the statement that there was something "abnormal" in a winch launch. Again, different conditions require different techniques, which means different normalities. I think we're generally agreed that the conditions during a routine winch launch are quite "normal" for a glider and its usual modes of flight. The assertion, which I agree with, is that the conditions of a launch failure are abnormal to the normal modes of operation for the glider and so need peculiar training and discipline to handle safely. But that's no more a slur against winch launching than the risk of a turbulence induced incipient spin is a discouragement to thermalling a glider. As long as you know better than to just "pull back hard on the stick" to prevent the spin developing and don't try to scratch away from stupidly low heights it's a non-issue. This is the approach I take: Normality depends on cirumstance, so broaden your view and your repertoire of techniques. However, the obvious extension of such a relativistic view is to argue that abnormality is a fabrication of perception and that everything can be termed "normal" within the context of itself. Which may be all well and good but is catastrophically useless when it comes to defining anything in terms that are any more than halfway useful. That said, I can't say I don't agree with you -- Bill Gribble http://www.scapegoatsanon.demon.co.uk - Learn from the mistakes of others. - You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
I found it difficult, in practice, to pull the stick back far enough to
park the nose on the horizon. Very couterintuitive (for me, at least), though I can see how any pilot at low altitude might let a canopy full of terrain misinform his better judgement. BTW, throughout a dozen or more of these maneuvers, the glider never spun. I'll give details. And remember, the point of the exercise wasn't to show how misapplied controls might cause a sudden spin (this was more than clear throughout the maneuver), but what would happen if I paid accute attention to coordination. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Glad to inject some humor into your life.
I too am amused by the risks we accept through habituation. I regularly take off in tailwinds exceeding 15 knots, with water, on a runway only 2,600 feet long. I'm used to it, and accept the risk as a byproduct of where I fly. Most pilots would consider these practices insane. As a result, I stood in a amazement at a US Nationals when pilots were showing grave concern over the safety of a launch with less than 7 miles per hour of tail wind. For pilots who winch launch regularly, the definition of normal flight attitudes is greatly expanded. But I think you'll all agree that it is a highly specialized type of flying (even if you are used to it). Pull on the stick to go faster. Push to go slower. If the cable breaks, no messing around... stick right forward until the nose is well below the horizon, then ease it back gently, paying attention to your airspeed. Abrupt control motions, significantly reduced g, large angles of nose up and nose down, close to the ground, special considerations regarding turns... sounds to me like a pretty threatening environment, sort of like taking off downwind at gross from a short runway. Deserves some special consideration. And occasional reexamination to prevent the complacency of experience. Chuckle. OC |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
I missed your last paragraph. As I noted to Andreas, it's all a matter
of what you are used to. A 200 foot rope break in the absence of strong winds or turbulence is completely benign, at least for me, having done hundreds of them. What I'm finding interesting is the need to make fairly dramatic motions of the controls as part of a cable break recovery. So again, I'll flirt with the term aerobatic, not as a maneveur designed to thrill and excite and audience or a passenger, but as a way to differentiate use of the controls given these circumstances. Even if you fail to observe the moment the rope breaks on aerotow, and only become aware of it as you fail to maintain position behind the tow plane, use of the controls is not nearly so dramatic as post cable break. Nor, apparently, quite as critical. Though I think we can both agree that they each represent real emergencies demanding preplanned action. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:23:05 UTC, Don Johnstone
wrote: : I know we are getting off the original thread but winch : launching holds no fear for me. It bleeding terrifies me - but I think that's pretty healthy! I spend quite a lot of time each year introducing children to the joys of soldering. After I have explained how hot the iron is, how important it is not to touch the metal bits, and so on, I ask if anyone is scared. A few timid hands always go up - at which point I say "Well done! You've been listening - there are some things in life which it is right to be scared of, and soldering is one of them". "Anything to do with aviation, and especially winch launching" is one of the others, I suggest! Ian -- |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Daniels wrote:
I am fighting a lonely battle to convince my fellow USA pilots that winch launch is a perfectly normal way to launch gliders and not some invention of the devil. Just three things to consider: A which launch brings you to a certain altitude above the site. At some places, this gives you enough options to find a thermal, at other sites, it does not. A winch operation doesn't mix well with other traffic. It's doable, if everybody is willing. And, most important: If done correctly, a winch launch is safe. But there is an extremely small margin for errors. I love winch launches, but they are dead serious, literally. Stefan |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:48:07 UTC, Stefan
wrote: : Last weekend I flew in the mountains. Conditions were rough and I had to : make fairly dramatic motions of the controls to keep the blue side up. : I'll log it as an aerobatic flight, then. All this seems to hinge on what's meant by "aerobatic". Frankly, it seems like a pretty pointless term to me, since it seems to depend on the intention of the pilot rather on the manoevres flown. Why, for example, is a loop aerobatic yet a tight thermalling turn, involving similar stresses on the glider, is not? To me, it makes more sense to categorize manoevres as high load / low load and high risk / low risk, where "load" relates to forces on the glider and "risk" relates to the speed with which things will go wrong if the pilot misreacts. That gives four permutations: 1) low load / low risk (normal flight) 2) low load / high risk (inverted flight) 3) high load / low risk (loop, tight thermalling) 4) high load / high risk (spin or spiral dive recovery) This is off the top of my head, and I am sure we could argue about the categories (should there be a "medium" in each case?) and categorisations (how hard is a loop) for ages. However, I think I would put many display aerobatic manoevres and winch launching together in the high load / high risk category: it's not that winch launching is aerobatic (whatever that means) but it is also a time when the glider is being flown with higher than normal structural loadings and when pilot error can cause things to go very nasty very quickly. I'd put mountain flying, from the little I have done, in the low load / high risk category at the very least, and probably high / high on rough days. Ian -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |