If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Feet Per Minute Conversion Question
I think in Feet Per Minute... I must be from a different country.
How do you convert Kts per Sec / Meters per sec / Kilometers etc... to Feet per minute Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
feet per sec X 0.508 = meters per sec
This from the 1987 SSA MEMBERSHIP HANDBOOK. Haven't seen an updated book in 20 years. It has lots of useful information, like this in it. JJ Sinclair |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like they made the mistake of assuming that a nautical mile was 6000
feet when it's actually 6080 ft "JJ Sinclair" wrote in message ... feet per sec X 0.508 = meters per sec This from the 1987 SSA MEMBERSHIP HANDBOOK. Haven't seen an updated book in 20 years. It has lots of useful information, like this in it. JJ Sinclair |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 23:09:17 +0100, "Pete S"
wrote: Looks like they made the mistake of assuming that a nautical mile was 6000 feet when it's actually 6080 ft It's actually 6076.115 feet, but 1 knot=100 fpm is entirely precise enough for glide computation purposes. rj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete S" wrote in message ...
Looks like they made the mistake of assuming that a nautical mile was 6000 feet when it's actually 6080 ft No, it's actually 1852 m in today's world. Your 6080 ft is 1853.184 m, all around the world since an international agreement on the definition of the yard (and thus feet, inches, etc.) over 40 years ago. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You seem like a swell person. I have two tickets to the rodeo. Maybe you
would like to have some Chinese food and a couple of brewskis, then we can go to rodeo together. You will really enjoy it. Try to rent some Levi's though. I don't think a starched collar is appropriate. "Gene Nygaard" wrote in message m... "Pete S" wrote in message ... Looks like they made the mistake of assuming that a nautical mile was 6000 feet when it's actually 6080 ft No, it's actually 1852 m in today's world. Your 6080 ft is 1853.184 m, all around the world since an international agreement on the definition of the yard (and thus feet, inches, etc.) over 40 years ago. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nygaard is a troll. He is *not* a glider person. He gets his jollies
by trying to "show off" his supposedly superior knowledge of units of measure. Ignore him. (Gene Nygaard) wrote in message om... "Pete S" wrote in message ... Looks like they made the mistake of assuming that a nautical mile was 6000 feet when it's actually 6080 ft No, it's actually 1852 m in today's world. Your 6080 ft is 1853.184 m, all around the world since an international agreement on the definition of the yard (and thus feet, inches, etc.) over 40 years ago. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
got this from a friend | JD | Naval Aviation | 7 | August 31st 03 03:21 AM |