If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Ward" wrote: Notice that although it will be a solo attempt, the GlobalFlyer's useful load would allow for two people plus full fuel. As long as they didn't eat or drink for three days. Gives a whole new meaning to the term "a fast flight". Tim Ward No "fast flight" needed: Voyager, 2 people + food + water for 9 days: 434 lb. GlobalFlyer, 2 people + food + water for 3.3 days: 489 lb. David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
David O wrote:
nafod40 wrote: Actually, Dave, the clip I posted was the entire article. To me, though, 18,000 lb of fuel kinda screamed "unrefueled" anyway. A friend of mine logged a .3 while flying an F-111 at 300 feet and Mach .95 (ingress) and Mach 1.3 (egress) in a Maple Flag exercise in Canada. They burned 20,000+ lbs of go juice. I guess 18,000 lbs screamed "low fuel light" to them. : ) One word: context. A single Williams FJ44-3 turbofan, 18,000 lb of fuel, and a composite aircraft built by Burt Rutan for an around the world attempt screams "unrefueled" to me. It should also scream unrefueled to those with a knowledge of modern small turbofan SFC's and a modicum of common sense. Your reply to my post screams "lack of sense of humor" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Hyde wrote:
Look, I'm really sorry I asked, OK? No, not OK. My pen has been too poison of late. Sorry for any offense. David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |