Some caveats for people new to aviation and to this group

A gross exaggeration. Headhunters do not eat their victims.

According to research I've compiled it would appear that they do in
part consume their victims, hence they would eat their victims...
please state the relative sources that you have showing they do not...
if you are honest you will agree with me, if you're not continue to
believe in whatever it is you believe that I don't believe in... so on
and so forth interapax.

Does the above remind you of anyone?

wrote in message
ups.com...
A gross exaggeration. Headhunters do not eat their victims.

According to research I've compiled it would appear that they do in
part consume their victims, hence they would eat their victims...
please state the relative sources that you have showing they do not...
if you are honest you will agree with me, if you're not continue to
believe in whatever it is you believe that I don't believe in... so on
and so forth interapax.

Does the above remind you of anyone?

Sure... my in-laws!

wrote in message
ups.com...
A gross exaggeration. Headhunters do not eat their victims.

According to research I've compiled it would appear that they do in
part consume their victims, hence they would eat their victims...
please state the relative sources that you have showing they do not...
if you are honest you will agree with me, if you're not continue to
believe in whatever it is you believe that I don't believe in... so on
and so forth interapax.

Does the above remind you of anyone?


Sounds like it might be part of a tutorial written on what to expect on
Usenet :-)

Dudley Henriques

A gross exaggeration. Headhunters do not eat their victims.

According to research I've compiled it would appear that they do in
part consume their victims, hence they would eat their victims...
please state the relative sources that you have showing they do not...
if you are honest you will agree with me, if you're not continue to
believe in whatever it is you believe that I don't believe in... so on
and so forth interapax, amen.

Does the above remind you of anyone?

With remarkably few changes from the original post I offer the
following:

Every now and then we get a contentious, obnoxious know-it-all who in
fact has only rudimentary knowledge of politics and leadership. Past
examples include Andrew Johnson, Warren G. Harding, and others. There
is one such haunting the office even now. The current guy is the worst
compared to some of the previous ones.

These presidents are not friends of America. They have no idea what they are
talking about. They freely give advice that may be dangerous. They do not
care if they kill somebody else and in fact they probably hope they do.

Beware of anyone who continually offers advice or information that
runs counter to what the vast majority of citizens and statesmen have
to say. Yes, the rest of us can be wrong and we all have our
disagreements, but if someone stands out as continually disagreeing
with people who actually have experience, he is not your friend. He is
trying to kill you. Treat him accordingly.

--
Instead of studying for finals, what about just going to the Bahamas
and catching some rays? Maybe you'll flunk, but you might have flunked
anyway; that's my point.
- Jack Handey

Bob Fry wrote:

Every now and then we get a contentious, obnoxious know-it-all . . .

Every now and then we also get morons that can't read and or comprehend
the subject of the thread, or even the name of the group.


--
Chris W
KE5GIX

"Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM,
learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"

Gift Giving Made Easy
Get the gifts you want &
give the gifts they want
One stop wish list for any gift,
from anywhere, for any occasion!
http://thewishzone.com

"CW" == Chris W Chris writes:

CW Bob Fry wrote:
Every now and then we get a contentious, obnoxious know-it-all
. . .

CW Every now and then we also get morons that can't read and or
CW comprehend the subject of the thread, or even the name of the
CW group.

Every now and then? Damn near every other post is off topic in
r.a.p.

--
In America you can go on the air and kid the politicians, and the
politicians can go on the air and kid the people.
Groucho Marx

C J Campbell wrote:

Beware of anyone who continually posts advice or information that runs
counter to what the vast majority of seasoned pilots and flight instructors
here have to say.

Anyone that has to be told that, shouldn't be at the controls of an
airplane, or any mechanical devise.


--
Chris W
KE5GIX

"Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM,
learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"

Gift Giving Made Easy
Get the gifts you want &
give the gifts they want
One stop wish list for any gift,
from anywhere, for any occasion!
http://thewishzone.com

On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:03:42 -0800, Chris W wrote
(in article ):

C J Campbell wrote:

Beware of anyone who continually posts advice or information that runs
counter to what the vast majority of seasoned pilots and flight instructors
here have to say.

Anyone that has to be told that, shouldn't be at the controls of an
airplane, or any mechanical devise.




Maybe not, but I have become a pessimist.

Maybe not, but I have become a pessimist.

That may be realated to excessive reading of r.a.s and r.a.p. :-))

Peter